Tritium mining will receive adjustments before launch to make it more lucrative (particularly in relation to sub-surface mining).
Lucrativity isn't what people are chiefly concerned about, it's the quantity in regards to jumping the carrier. I along with a fair amount of people would be fine if you dropped the value of Tritium and made it more
plentiful if it meant we wouldn't have to spend hours trying to fuel up our carrier.
As it stands we are essentially burning by the hundreds of tons a material that's as rare as Low Temp Diamonds to move our carriers. Tritium isn't
THAT uncommon in the universe, you shouldn't be able to make money with it unless you trade many many TONS of it. Tritium is an isotope of hydrogen, and hydrogen fuel is the most plentiful commodity and substance in the universe, so it just boggles me how in this game it's treated as rare as diamonds (to turn a phrase.), something that stereotypically accounts for 0.8% of any given amount of regolith of geologically active planets.
See it's statements like that, especially when they come at after the "Thanks for your feedback." That make me question if you
really are listening, understanding and caring what that feedback is or is it more of a PR statement, and you really just want us to shut up. You've had plenty of Cmdrs who have told you they don't want to spend all their time mining for Trit to fuel their carriers, and yet this statement is about making them more Lucrative. Now perhaps this might be a "British English vs American English" thing and I'm misinterpreting, and if I'm wrong then I apologize. But
Lucrativity has more to do with value and profitability rather then quantity, which the word "Plenty" and it's variations would be more applicable.
Now I'm hoping I am reading the situation totally wrong, as in, I
want to be wrong about this, If that was not your intention Stephen, then again I'm sorry. But it's been my experience from the past that has made me
extremely skeptical when it comes to Fdev.
Thank you Stephen.
Wow 9th is very close. I would have preferred probably a longer time to implement also all the other QoL requested in the numerous feedbacks.
Just as an example of the most common requested:
- Tritium direct transfer from storage to tank
- Further improvement of Tritium efficiency
Yeah this is EXACTLY what worries me, such a short turn around time from my past experience means they are going with alot as is, and our feedback changes would show up in the patch 1 of fleet carriers. That's assuming they are planning on implementing them at all