I dont understand people attribute almost blblical devotion to 8 year old documents.
Well, people have devoted literally biblical devotion to considerably older documents.
I dont understand people attribute almost blblical devotion to 8 year old documents.
They sound like kids angry because dad promised to take them to McDonalds but didn't.
No. Because I dont give a damn about visions and look at what's delivered. If you believe some vision you'll go 100% disappointed because that's the inspiration that willl never be met.Because the entire point of those documents were stuff not at launch but the long term vision for the game. Imo FD can't have it both ways, ie sell us with a vision and kick in extra cash for say the LTP on the vision but warn players that much of this feature set won't be at launch but come years in the future.
But then when years in the future argue "that does not count that was years ago"
Do you not see the disconnect there?.
IF you are going to sell jam tomorrow but ask for money today then when tomorrow comes
s will expect jam.... And not Tesco's value stuff but actual taste the difference stuff full of pieces of fruit.
Plans change but FD owe it to their long term player base to inform then when those plans change and why.... Untill that happens then as far as I am concerned FD can be reminded of those early documents.
I dunno about you but if I order a taxi and pay it to take me to McDonald's then that is exactly what I expect .... Or if that can't happen for some reason I expect to be told why and want to know what the alternate destination will be... Btw this was your analogy not mine.They sound like kids angry because dad promised to take them to McDonalds but didn't.
Well that is fair enough and your choice..BUT remember . If NO ONE had bought into the vision however there is a chance we would not be here debating it .No. Because I dont give a damn about visions and look at what's delivered. If you believe some vision you'll go 100% disappointed because that's the inspiration that willl never be met.
It's not common player's job to finance game development - at least not prototype and concept stage. If early access has something to show it's still enough of a risk for the consumer to buy in.Well that is fair enough and your choice..BUT remember . If NO ONE had bought into the vision however there is a chance we would not be here debating it .
To be fair, everything Frontier told us about during the kickstarter, and the DDF and afterwards, was all under the "subject to change" understanding.Because the entire point of those documents were stuff not at launch but the long term vision for the game. Imo FD can't have it both ways, ie sell us with a vision and kick in extra cash for say the LTP on the vision but warn players that much of this feature set won't be at launch but come years in the future.
But then when years in the future argue "that does not count that was years ago"
Do you not see the disconnect there?.
IF you are going to sell jam tomorrow but ask for money today then when tomorrow comes
Players will expect jam.... And not Tesco's value stuff but actual taste the difference stuff full of pieces of fruit.
Plans change but FD owe it to their long term player base to inform then when those plans change and why.... Untill that happens then as far as I am concerned FD can be reminded of those early documents.
In fact it is precisely because of that that now when FD say not at launch but maybe later I am very suspicious.... Deja vu and all that.
...those kids grow up with daddy issues and end up on the pole.That is almost as hilarious as those who say Frontier promised this or promised that.
They sound like kids angry because dad promised to take them to McDonalds but didn't.
I dont understand people attribute almost blblical devotion to 8 year old documents.
Can't believe you managed to start a mini-argument about whether going to McDonald's was going to happen or not, and more importantly, who was driving...!!That is almost as hilarious as those who say Frontier promised this or promised that.
They sound like kids angry because dad promised to take them to McDonalds but didn't.
Absolutely and I (hope) I never use the term promised. However until we hear otherwise they are still things they would.like to do and are working towards. If it's such a minor issue then communicating changes should be fine right?To be fair, everything Frontier told us about during the kickstarter, and the DDF and afterwards, was all under the "subject to change" understanding.
Over the years, that part of all the things they talked about has been forgotten, and people have taken what Frontier said as "things we'd like to do" and Chinese-whispered them into "things Frontier promised".
Calling people children for wanting FD to update us on the original design plan? I think you worded it precisely to get a reaction. I don't mind either way, am not salty with you over it but I think you are being less than honest there!Honestly I was wondering what I could've said that would warrant it getting four replies.
The best ones are unintented mate lol!Honestly I was wondering what I could've said that would warrant it getting four replies.
In that case you missed many of the other points I was looking to make, but that's OK, because I incorrectly used "promise", the rest of my post is not worth reading I guess. If this was a "proposal" then I guess Frontier have been right all along, like all the other "proposals" they made as part of the kick starter campaign...Stopped reading it right there.
Frontier didn't "promise" new vehicles, they proposed new vehicles.
I've been here a while, I am very familiar with Frontier, more so than many who post on here, and yes, they have a well deserved reputation for falling short of the expectations they instilled in the community, but I also try to reign back the community, mainly to avoid situations where the community criticizes Frontier when it's not fair of them to do so.In that case you missed many of the other points I was looking to make, but that's OK, because I incorrectly used "promise", the rest of my post is not worth reading I guess. If this was a "proposal" then I guess Frontier have been right all along, like all the other "proposals" they made as part of the kick starter campaign...
When five years isn't long enough...SPACE LEGS CONFIrm...
wait...
When five years isn't long enough...![]()
Who cares? At least that was an obvious scam from the start from my perspective – credit where credit is due.How long has Star Citizen been in development?![]()