Frontier discusses walking in ships in Dev Plan

Because the entire point of those documents were stuff not at launch but the long term vision for the game. Imo FD can't have it both ways, ie sell us with a vision and kick in extra cash for say the LTP on the vision but warn players that much of this feature set won't be at launch but come years in the future.
But then when years in the future argue "that does not count that was years ago"
Do you not see the disconnect there?.

IF you are going to sell jam tomorrow but ask for money today then when tomorrow comes
s will expect jam.... And not Tesco's value stuff but actual taste the difference stuff full of pieces of fruit.
Plans change but FD owe it to their long term player base to inform then when those plans change and why.... Untill that happens then as far as I am concerned FD can be reminded of those early documents.
No. Because I dont give a damn about visions and look at what's delivered. If you believe some vision you'll go 100% disappointed because that's the inspiration that willl never be met.
 
They sound like kids angry because dad promised to take them to McDonalds but didn't.
I dunno about you but if I order a taxi and pay it to take me to McDonald's then that is exactly what I expect .... Or if that can't happen for some reason I expect to be told why and want to know what the alternate destination will be... Btw this was your analogy not mine.
 
No. Because I dont give a damn about visions and look at what's delivered. If you believe some vision you'll go 100% disappointed because that's the inspiration that willl never be met.
Well that is fair enough and your choice..BUT remember . If NO ONE had bought into the vision however there is a chance we would not be here debating it .
FD had delivered precisely nothing when they told us they needed money to get the game made.
 
Last edited:
Well that is fair enough and your choice..BUT remember . If NO ONE had bought into the vision however there is a chance we would not be here debating it .
It's not common player's job to finance game development - at least not prototype and concept stage. If early access has something to show it's still enough of a risk for the consumer to buy in.
 
OP is not completely wrong. Yes, it is an old video and AFAIK DB never says space-legs is going to happen, he just says something like "it's something we'd like to have". Like ice-worlds, like a Panther Clipper, like a story-based (Thargoid) game narrative, like space-legs, dynamic capital ships (remember that?), Scavengers, ship-boarding, etc, etc, etc,.

But the fact remains, DB used his claims to get his funding, lots of people signed on, he got his funding (and much more) but then did not deliver. OK, it is cool for a while, seeing new planets, flying the ships and working to get them but, what then? Endlessly mine for credits? Endless bang-bang, pew-pew? Endless jump-HONK, jump-HONK? What do you all think you are going to do with space-legs? WALK AROUND?? Sounds about as much fun as driving around randomly in the SRV.

DB has delivered what he wanted but, not necessarily what a lot of the fan/player-base wanted.

For me, "a mile wide and an inch deep" perfectly describes the game. The forum is more fun than playing the game at this point. o7
 
Because the entire point of those documents were stuff not at launch but the long term vision for the game. Imo FD can't have it both ways, ie sell us with a vision and kick in extra cash for say the LTP on the vision but warn players that much of this feature set won't be at launch but come years in the future.
But then when years in the future argue "that does not count that was years ago"
Do you not see the disconnect there?.

IF you are going to sell jam tomorrow but ask for money today then when tomorrow comes
Players will expect jam.... And not Tesco's value stuff but actual taste the difference stuff full of pieces of fruit.
Plans change but FD owe it to their long term player base to inform then when those plans change and why.... Untill that happens then as far as I am concerned FD can be reminded of those early documents.
In fact it is precisely because of that that now when FD say not at launch but maybe later I am very suspicious.... Deja vu and all that.
To be fair, everything Frontier told us about during the kickstarter, and the DDF and afterwards, was all under the "subject to change" understanding.
Over the years, that part of all the things they talked about has been forgotten, and people have taken what Frontier said as "things we'd like to do" and Chinese-whispered them into "things Frontier promised".
 
That is almost as hilarious as those who say Frontier promised this or promised that.

They sound like kids angry because dad promised to take them to McDonalds but didn't.
...those kids grow up with daddy issues and end up on the pole.

Don't lie to your kids people!
 
To be fair, everything Frontier told us about during the kickstarter, and the DDF and afterwards, was all under the "subject to change" understanding.
Over the years, that part of all the things they talked about has been forgotten, and people have taken what Frontier said as "things we'd like to do" and Chinese-whispered them into "things Frontier promised".
Absolutely and I (hope) I never use the term promised. However until we hear otherwise they are still things they would.like to do and are working towards. If it's such a minor issue then communicating changes should be fine right?
 
Stopped reading it right there.
Frontier didn't "promise" new vehicles, they proposed new vehicles.
In that case you missed many of the other points I was looking to make, but that's OK, because I incorrectly used "promise", the rest of my post is not worth reading I guess. If this was a "proposal" then I guess Frontier have been right all along, like all the other "proposals" they made as part of the kick starter campaign...
 
In that case you missed many of the other points I was looking to make, but that's OK, because I incorrectly used "promise", the rest of my post is not worth reading I guess. If this was a "proposal" then I guess Frontier have been right all along, like all the other "proposals" they made as part of the kick starter campaign...
I've been here a while, I am very familiar with Frontier, more so than many who post on here, and yes, they have a well deserved reputation for falling short of the expectations they instilled in the community, but I also try to reign back the community, mainly to avoid situations where the community criticizes Frontier when it's not fair of them to do so.

The claim that Frontier "promised" something, is not a new claim, and has its roots in the kickstarter, when people confused the FAQ or the videos as being promises, so you're not the first and not the last to confuse matters.

We all make mistakes, me more than others, so I hope you'll forgive the patronising tone of this comment, I honestly don't mean it in such a manner.
 
Back
Top Bottom