Yeah, no... the original trilogy was about as grounded as a hot-aired balloon; science was frequently sacrificed for story telling... and most anything involving the T-Rex or Velociraptors were pure fantasy... and the JW movies not visceral? The pterosaur attack... watching someone get eaten alive by a mosasaur... seeing all the people and animals killed by the Indominus... the raptors turning on the humans... the Indoraptor ripping off a guy's arm and eating it... and so on... I swear, you people want to hate the new movies so much your trying to invent a new reality to justify it...
I think you missed the point a tad there.
Creative liberties are always taken, but the scenario even if exaggerated and scientifically inaccurate was still in service to a grounded idea of how people might realistically act in a hypothetical dinosaur theme park. Jurassic World had a theme about a fully operational dinosaur theme park that was sanitized by corporate interests which albeit true was also an excuse for Universal to push hard on the marketing of real world companies. The overall execution of JW is less convincing than the Jurassic Park trilogy-- even acknowledging the much maligned Raptor gymnastics and Dream Raptor sequences or JP3 in general.
Animals felt like they had less weight to them, more about special effects and intense scenes than being somewhat akin to animals. You hear Star Wars fans talk about this all the time with how lightsaber duels have this huge contrast from the original films to the new trilogy. I mean just look at how Blue emerged as this hero dinosaur, a slightly unexpected but welcomed marketing tool. Blue and the Rex fighting together to defeat the Indominus was also much more of a childhood fantasy scenario where they teamed up to defeat the new big bad. The pterosaur attack in JW was undermined again by execution and a really bad over-the-top death for Zara. This attack was undermined by how the response to it was, comically late alarm, Claire and Owen rushing in to be the heroes firing tranquilizers like bullets, and then topped off by the Zara death that was so laughable because it kept getting more ridiculous. Had they left it at her getting picked up and carried away it would have been visceral instead they kept tossing her around and had to make a scene for the Mosasaur at the end.
Fallen Kingdom altogether showed the bad direction Universal took with the trilogy in terms of its execution. The new characters of Franklin and Zia felt like they walked in off the streets of California and into the studio. Their acting was too hyperbolic with Franklin's comical screams and the sanitizer scene, Zia I completely lost my suspension of disbelief with the second she said she was studying to be a Paleo-Veterinarian but had never visited Jurassic World. All the blood was scrubbed from the film, a crucial scene detailing the Indoraptor was cut instead of the other nonsense, they had to pan over Claire's boots because of the dumb outrage of her running in high heels at the end of JW, the entire scenario going back to Isla Nublar felt like a worse executed Lost World.
It felt rushed, the villains were typical Saturday morning cartoon villains, the scene with Owen crawling away from the lava went on too long and felt so forced for laughs, surviving pyroclastic flow was a liberty too far. Hammond got a new middle name for no reason, Lockwood might as well not have been in the movie for all he contributed, the auction prices were stupidly low, Blue really played up too much as a hero character with how she killed the Indoraptor. Stygy was the new marketing mascot pushed alongside Blue, Bumpy would follow for Camp Cretaceous. They made Dr. Wu look like a bumbling clown for how easily he was removed as a threat.
Special mention for Battle at Big Rock where a little girl is firing bolts at an Allosaurus with a crossbow while the neighbors are in hiding. That was even worse than the Raptor gymnastics scene in Lost World.
Finally, are we not going to address the elephant in the room that is a continual push for the inclusion of more Chinese dinosaurs given China is such a huge market for Hollywood films. This explains why Pachyrhinosaurus was put on the chopping block for Sinoceratops even though the former is far more well known and popular. Frontier does it too since Tencent has a small ownership of their company, and all Chinese companies are state-run companies, but I will leave it at that rather than bring in all the politics surrounding it.
I will say Qianzhousaurus is a great addition though and a nice reference to Steve Brusatte the paleontological consultant for Dominion.
Yet for all the fumbled execution, the JW films have had some stellar ideas far more in the direction Crichton would have wanted. They also took some chances with blowing up Nublar the way they did and introducing dinosaurs to the mainland and especially the human cloning implications. I think I've made my point sufficiently though with just a few things about both JW movies being less visceral.
.
.