Galnet E3 announcement by president Hudson?

By definition, griefers are not looking for a fair fight.

Yeah, this is pretty much what I said. But some of them may not be "real" griefers and attack other players because of the lack of PvP content? I don't know. I am not that kind of player anyway, so it is hard for me to understand their motives.

An Arena mode woudn't be a bad idea. With tournaments and leaderboard, monetary rewards and reputation (who's the best fighter of the galaxy ?) it could easily blend in the game. It could also be a reliable way to find PvP opponents fully equipped and ready for battle.

Would love that!
 
Last edited:
Oh come on, not an arena mode... yet another side thing that won't improve the main game nor correct its flaws. We don't need this. There are other games for this. I guess this has something to do with the console release : "Join Elite Dangerous, the best arena space fighter! Also included, a career mode." I hope not :(
 
Oh come on, not an arena mode... yet another side thing that won't improve the main game nor correct its flaws. We don't need this. There are other games for this. I guess this has something to do with the console release : "Join Elite Dangerous, the best arena space fighter! Also included, a career mode." I hope not :(

The others kinds of PvP (I suppose you mean piracy, "surprise mothertrucker" and others) will not disappear. People who like the Arena will go there and those who don't won't (reminds me of Powerplay's catch line). What's dull or wrong about that ?
 
Last edited:
What's wrong? It's a shift in the game's philosophy, after its release, which is... weird. It's money and development time that won't be allocated to complete the features that were discussed in the DDA and that are assumed to still be planned (FD haven't said otherwise).
 

Viajero

Volunteer Moderator
What's wrong? It's a shift in the game's philosophy, after its release, which is... weird. It's money and development time that won't be allocated to complete the features that were discussed in the DDA and that are assumed to still be planned (FD haven't said otherwise).

A shift in philosophy probably it is. Cant recall a dev diary or other instance where arenas could have been discussed really.

Having said that, the fact FDEV may (still pure speculation actually, lets not forget) be preparing arena modes, does NOT mean they wont be preparing more of the content that has been actually discussed in the past. Let´s not jump to conclusions. This game has not yet stopped developing as far as I can see.
 
Last edited:
There have been enormous requests for arena mode. Anyone scanning forums and subreddit on regular basis know that.

It's also low hanging fruit for FD to handle. Yes, I want more of original game, but I already have so little time to access stuff we currently have.

I personally however think that arena mode will be part of XBO exclusive.

- - - Updated - - -

What's wrong? It's a shift in the game's philosophy, after its release, which is... weird. It's money and development time that won't be allocated to complete the features that were discussed in the DDA and that are assumed to still be planned (FD haven't said otherwise).

FD has to go after money, as more money means more dev hours to sink into features discussed in DDA.

They don't have a sub. It's their curse and blessing.
 
There have been enormous requests for arena mode. Anyone scanning forums and subreddit on regular basis know that.

It's also low hanging fruit for FD to handle. Yes, I want more of original game, but I already have so little time to access stuff we currently have.

I personally however think that arena mode will be part of XBO exclusive.

- - - Updated - - -



FD has to go after money, as more money means more dev hours to sink into features discussed in DDA.

They don't have a sub. It's their curse and blessing.

Remember, we are all speculating. I hope we will all be embarassed when we find out what the announcement is really about.

Anyway, If there is to be an arena, then I have no major problem with it. I do think it is much less important than putting in features we were led to expect, like proper exploring. But I also accept that the new target audience (which I state as a fact not an opinion, naughty me, but that is how it has looked ever since the game was released) probably want arena much more than exploring.

If I were a cynic, heaven forbid, I would also fear that FD would find a non-immersive clunky way of adding arenas. Yes, it is low hanging fruit: the flight mechanics and weapons are all there, we have outfitting to let the players prepare ships, etc. They have to build a wrapper to organise stuff, and make a few tweaks to ensure that damage, insurance, rankings are affected appropriately (which is not at all, for most of it). But it can still be done well, or badly.

Interestingly, arenas (and flight simulators) were discussed in the DDF, and FD made it pretty clear that they did not want them in their game.
 
Last edited:
Seriously...if i wouldnt have ED in my list yet, i would totally buy it when they release some kind of Arena PVP.
Im not a huge fan of pvp in the main game, actually i dont like pvp in most mmos, im more the PVE guy...
but sometimes a small game is fun. just shooting things without loosing a ship for real.

ED is such a slooooow game, its rare that you even see a commander in open (and even harder now while wings n stuff are bugged),
so it might be a good decision to just press a button and start a pvp match with others.
maybe it will even be based on your main game? if you dont have a cobra, you cant use it in the simulation.
and maybe the arena could even reward you with some credits...

i would like that.
i would play it
 
I think an arena mode could be really good for the game, 1v1 to 4v4, additionally it would be nice if they added an player elo & stats, leader boards, daily automated knockout tourneys with CR prizes, and a CR betting systems for players.
 
Remember, we are all speculating. I hope we will all be embarassed when we find out what the announcement is really about.

Yeah, that snippet was still very vague in terms of factual information. As for implementation - it can be spun as 'way to test ships before buying them, etc. Judging by snipped anything that comes will come as something in-game, not as separate entity.

Anyway, those are just 2 days. If i would have to bet, I still would say it's XBO timed exclusive thing they hinted for (and if that's so, thats best way to do it, because I see exclusive ships for example as something much worse). We will know soon enough.
 
Pecisk, you saved me a lot of writing today. As a German with faded English skills it takes me a lot of effort to express myself here. I agree with every single word of your (at least) 10 posts and thank you for restoring my faith in mankind a bit.
 
Circus Games have always raised the crowds

7350336.jpg


Not much of a crowd there Patrick_68000 :)
 
I hope not. I think I'm not alone in being against any kind of PvP arena. It just isn't something that fits with the ED Universe IMO and isn't needed. If you want to fight other commanders go to the usual places.

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah, but so what? More customers -> more money -> more resources to improve on the game.
= More idiots

- - - Updated - - -

Well... welcome to the real world. Besides: It isn't like the community hasn't asked for an arena mode.
The "community" hasn't asked for any such thing. A small percentage of players have. I suspect mostly snotty-nosed teenagers that are used to such things in other games.
 
Wall o' quotes incoming!

Agree with those saying Arena Mode has been requested and could be fun and allow consensual PvP without risk of your commander's credits and reputation in the Persistent World/ Galaxy/ Universe. Agree with those that want the full DDA implemented, of course! But I still think most of it is coming. Realistically, after Arena Mode, what is there console-specific that FD can focus on developing? I don't see anything, but then I don't own a console...

Comments about the original vision need to acknowledge that FD could not develop the game based on Kickstarter funds of about $3 Million USD, which is enough for maybe 6 months of 100 dev's time. IMHO FD have not abandoned most of the DDA that is not implemented but have had to prioritize. To implement the DDA to a good level is probably a 5-year effort and I hope after Xbox sales start that FD is confident enough to add more developers to the team. FD knows a lot of the mechanics are "bare bones" and one dev pointed out that if the gamers know it you can bet the Devs do. But someone has to set the priorities and part of that calculus includes what will get enough money to fund ongoing development at a reasonable pace. They made the call and Xbox sales will tell if they were right.

Profit can be used to justify anything Beetlebum. :) It's a tired argument and one that is completely pointless to engage in, because it goes in circles and is self-fullfilling. The end result argument is always the same "Profit". Yes that is the way the world works. But that doesn't make it "good" or "right", and it certainly doesn't mean customers are going to be happy about it.

Regarding a potential Deathmatch module, I tend to feel this: Frontier also didn't explicitly state that we wouldn't have superheros, space whales or death stars.
Actually, I think they said explicitly that there would not be Death Stars. But I don't recall them saying there would not be rainbows and unicorns (surely PG routines will end up creating a unicorn, so bonus points for the first pictures of a unicorn under a rainbow when planetary landings come in!).

It certainly seems to point towards PVP arenas. What a load of ... i really would like to fill this page with expletives. If this is PVP arena then I will repeatedly smash my face off the keyboard. An obvious attempt to lure a different demographic to the game. Wasn't the reason behind the kickstarter so that we would avoid like this? Frontier are about to mess this up real good.
No, Kickstarter was to prove there was enough demand to justify the up-front investment of money by FD, and that is what they said. KS did not raise enough cash to fund development for even a full year.

Other than by the development effort and $$$ (some of them ours) being diverted into such sideshows and away from the DDA and what the game that we backed with our money was supposed to be. But yeah, other than that no reason to be annoyed at all.

Edit: Maybe Powerplay and Arena Sideshow should be paid expansions if they are in such great demand, and won't affect the rest of us, while planetary landings, improved missions and exploration, and FPS ship boarding, other DDA features etc. all become free updates.
The KS backing was enough to pay for maybe 6 months of development- so I suppose that is the game you should get and be annoyed by. Easy to armchair general running a 100+ person development team, including the funding, harder to really do it. But I'm basically in agreement with you, I just don't think it was realistic from FD point of view at end of 2014.

Adding an arena mode that those players will never use after delivering what FD described to those players would be fine. Doing it before (or, worse still, instread of) delivering to their earlier promises is certain to get those players annoyed. I get it that I am no longer FDs new target demographic. I understand that getting new players into the game generates money to be spent on improving the game, and thus is in theory all good. But if those 'improvements' are things I do not want and are not the things that I do want, and felt I was promised (you know, like proper exploration), then again my nose will be put out of joint.

But I do know where I stand: FD have my money and are grateful for it, and have now forgotten all about me.
- - - Updated - - -

My memory is fading with senile decay, but I do seem to recall FD being consistently against the idea whenever it was brought up in the DDF
I agree with a lot of your posts, and have repped you, but I don't think they have forgotten all about "you", assuming you mean the DDF and KS backers that pledged a lot of money. But yeah, nostalgia doesn't pay the bills and the DDF may well be perma-banned. Sad FD hasn't been more clear on that topic- it is the one thing I do consider a slap in the face of the backers that pledged the most money. FD should be clear about state of the DDF to its members.

What's wrong? It's a shift in the game's philosophy, after its release, which is... weird. It's money and development time that won't be allocated to complete the features that were discussed in the DDA and that are assumed to still be planned (FD haven't said otherwise).
But the purpose of FD efforts so-far in 205 is to raise enough money to actually fund development of the full DDA + expansion work (which has to be paid by FD in advance of sales, so requires cash on hand). Coming to the end of 2014 FD was running in the red and needed to release to realize income from pre-sales and gauge how many additional sales FD could get from the PC crowd to see what they could afford to do. I think they are in a better place now, but I imagine it was nervous times last fall.

Remember, we are all speculating. I hope we will all be embarassed when we find out what the announcement is really about.
<snip>
Interestingly, arenas (and flight simulators) were discussed in the DDF, and FD made it pretty clear that they did not want them in their game.
Interesting- I don't recall those comments but then I'm sure I haven't read every single DDF post, although I did copy off and print the main dev posts of proposals, they were so good. Perhaps this is also why FD are not posting their design docs with the DDF any longer- too easy for other teams to copy them. Hopefully there will be a few other nuggets tossed out with Arena Combat, but those could be reserved for drip-feeding in MB's weekly dev updates leading up to the Xbox release.
 
Back
Top Bottom