I completely understand this. Question is, how do you stop the ones that want to join Fleetcomm to kill CMDRs?
You can't. So then what?
PvP Gankers in Fleetcomm at Beagle Point
- Thread starter VR SenseiMatty
- Start date
- Status
I completely understand this. Question is, how do you stop the ones that want to join Fleetcomm to kill CMDRs?
You can't. So then what?
They you cry "Uncle", and go with Old Duck's suggestion.
I don't like it either, but it's the only way to be sure.
You what now? Lol, grow up!
Sorry big guy, but you lose the moral high ground the second you denigrate me yet give a pass to daggersnake for his "d-baggery" comment and generally negative, deragatory attitude.
I'm sorry. I'm a 12 year old
edit: ability to start embedded videos from a timestamp. I'm sorry about all the nasty things I said about you forum.
How about this?
Get someone like me to consult on security for Distant Worlds 3.
Honestly, man, I think it is kinda wack
I’d rather see people using the suggested modes than combat logging in open
Not to say that this sort of thing wasn’t to be expected. Always be prepared lmao.
Flying allllll the way out to Beagle just to gank some paper planes in a PG ain’t really my bag, personally. My patience for travel is at an all time low, limited to the max range of my fuel, so all my griffin’ is gonna happen within 50-100ly.
I will say I admire the dedication of those who went out there for the sake of murder in general.
I’d rather see people using the suggested modes than combat logging in open
Not to say that this sort of thing wasn’t to be expected. Always be prepared lmao.
Flying allllll the way out to Beagle just to gank some paper planes in a PG ain’t really my bag, personally. My patience for travel is at an all time low, limited to the max range of my fuel, so all my griffin’ is gonna happen within 50-100ly.
I will say I admire the dedication of those who went out there for the sake of murder in general.
As if I've ever tried to hide where I was coming fromSource: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPn0KFlbqX8&feature=youtu.be&t=113
I'm sorry. I'm a 12 year old
edit: ability to start embedded videos from a timestamp. I'm sorry about all the nasty things I said about you forum.
Ok. How are you going to protect 12,000 players across all those instances?
Yea I can see how that comes across, my apologies. I love a good player vs player game. I’d even say open ganking is exciting on both sides as it creates a cat n mouse roulette. But as soon as the 4th wall breaks down and behavior isn’t about playing anymore, but about ruining another persons experience, for instance infiltrating their private group, I think it IS a negative thing. I don’t think it’s good for the game regardless of playstyle because it’s not about playing Elite anymore. I don’t think most people behave like that however, including infamous player killers.
Call me when there's a Distant Worlds 3, baby!
it would be absolutely hilarious if pvp-ers doin pg gankings will manage to convince fdev to introduce an open-pve mode
I don't think it would happen, but it would be priceless - never say never tho.
That would be super dumb. Better PG controls, like what Old Duck is suggesting, would be a more logical choice.
And you can count on my bow!
PG controls that would prevent pvp? Why will they introduce that, given the limitations of a PG, and not go full out with an open-pve mode?
Guess I know what Old Duck will say - half-baked
My point is: there is a slight chance that they will eventually get frustrated running pve events in a pvp environment
Guess I know what Old Duck will say - half-baked
My point is: there is a slight chance that they will eventually get frustrated running pve events in a pvp environment
Because Open Play is awesome and I doubt they'll change it because of people killing people in PGs.
Indeed it is.
yeap, all open-pve advocates are saying exactly the same thing
No. They’re not.
Like me, you don't know either.
Cry "Uncle", and go with Old Duck's suggestion. I rest my case
Like me, you don't know either.
Cry "Uncle", and go with Old Duck's suggestion. I rest my case
I would start by not discussing the matter on a public forum.
That one's pro bono.
- Status