reading the PvP comments above I get the overwhelming vibe of "wolf in sheep's clothing", anyone else get that?
You talking about my comments?
reading the PvP comments above I get the overwhelming vibe of "wolf in sheep's clothing", anyone else get that?
By the way, here's a selection of responses from the fellers on DWE2...
Outstanding!"I'm writing my dissertation on the myriad of ways cognitive dissonance refactors self-assessment of one's id, ego, and superego and whether or not these interactions are reflexive, reactive, or modal and redundant. [...]"
Excellent.
I've put together a selection of quotes as to what this event meant to Distant Ganks 2:
I just read your signature line.Outstanding!![]()
Don't have much respect for a guy who has to blank out his name to cover his [redacted].The only important quote from DG2 members is this one.
![]()
Don't have much respect for a guy who has to blank out his name to cover his [redacted].
* blocked *The only important quote from DG2 members is this one.
![]()
The only important quote from DG2 members is this one.
![]()
Don't have much respect for a guy who has to blank out his name to cover his [redacted].
Maybe that's just me - but then I own all my opinions.
I think one can make reasonable extrapolations based upon context.Being concerned about privacy, or forum rules, is not synonymous with shame or not owning one's opinions.
Why is it important?
We had someone here "not condoning" these PG infiltrations earlier.![]()
Funny because it is true"I'm writing my dissertation on the myriad of ways cognitive dissonance refactors self-assessment of one's id, ego, and superego and whether or not these interactions are reflexive, reactive, or modal and redundant. The Distant Ganks expedition has been an essential resource for this data." - Cindy Blankford, 28, Doctoral Candidate, Harvard.
Nah man, he would happily gloat about his practices with his discord name proudly displayed. They're all made up names anyway. I'm the only person as far as I know who feels comfortable displaying my real name and you don't see me shrinking from ownership of opinion.Don't have much respect for a guy who has to blank out his name to cover his [redacted].
Maybe that's just me - but then I own all my opinions. (1)
NOTES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1: And I suffer for them all of the time, in game, and in real life.
What do you mean double wasted?
I have no "problem" other than the ability to sympathise with others...if you regard that as a "problem" then all I can do is SMH.
It's your job to make your posts clear so that other people can read and understand your point of view.
See here:
If you CBA'd to make yourself clear and quote specifically what you mean, how do you expect anyone to understand your point?
I want to be able to discuss the point and not the poster here, but you're making it difficult through your obscurity.
Then call it out, man - quote those who you believe to have this bad attitude and have them answer for themselves.
It's more effective at making a point than your Meldrew-esque rambling.
I think one can make reasonable extrapolations based upon context.
You have obviously granted the benefit of the doubt, however, Judge Wargfoot isn't nearly as benevolent.
That's fine.I don't see what reasonable extrapolation could be made with regard to owning one's one opinions.
I'm not aware of anyone making the claim that concealment equates to shame.What doubt? My point was that concealment does not equal shame, which is something that should be self-evident.
That's good because it never has and it never will!
You talking about my comments?