The beautiful thing about six years and over a million light years of exploration is that I really don't give a fart in a high wind what anybody thinks.Oh you're in trouble now![]()
I didn't give one six years ago either 
The beautiful thing about six years and over a million light years of exploration is that I really don't give a fart in a high wind what anybody thinks.Oh you're in trouble now![]()
Could we possibly start a joint class action as ED has also driven me to drink!?You have forgotten drinking. Drinking is the key to salvation!(and that also explains the thing with the bad math) ^^
I only role play, of course, I swear![]()
That's all I did for five years and you've probably never seen my name. Over 400 billion stars. RYFS?I'm out in the black exploring and, from time to time, I get into a system with a valuable planet, like a water world. The system might have many more planets but none are explored. The only one discovered is the valuable one. That really sucks. Those players who "hunt" for valuables so they can put their name in "first discovered by" are despicable, not true explorers.
That's it, I'm finished venting.
If you think about it further, then plan-less and aimless commanders probably have the greater chance of encountering unexplored new territory. In my opinion, the choice of ships plays only a subordinate role. Economic routing plays a far greater role, if only because the mainstream wants to "make distance" first and foremost. Of course, it does matter which ship one flies, which FSD, etc., but not to one's advantage - as long as the discovery of unexplored systems is your main goal.
The latter,it was a reaction to constantly being told what 'true explorers' do during the flame war about the FSS. That's what the HO-NK tag is about too. NOT that I'm looking to start that discussion again, it's a really old picture but the no true Scotsman aspect was relevant hereI like the ID of your ship: HO-NK
Does "no true Scotsman" refer to the fact that you are Scottish (but not a typical Scot) or to the philosophical term (I guess it's the latter)?![]()
I would just like to clarify that I was never there.
To all the people who are drinking though, a reminder: the drinking game only applies to the exploration subforum by default, and extending it elsewhere (such as here in the DD) is listed as the "hard mode". As always, please drink responsibly!
Yep.Those players who "hunt" for valuables so they can put their name in "first discovered by" are despicable, not true explorers.
What does achieving Elite (and even twice!) have to do with our discussion? Maybe to underline your competence?
I imagine some are more system completionists, which I would lean to, though not always. But it is what it is and as is said, people's motivations differ, and it's a big galaxy.I'm curious now - if I were to go and scan/map ONLY the low value bodies, would the same salty-completionists be complaining that I'd ignored the ELWs, or are they solely motivated by greed?
That's what carriers are for...All alternate solution is to set your route filter to L, T and Y class stars only - then you won't find any of those nasty WWs that somebody might have cherrypicked. Snowballs all the way, baby!
Green Gass Giant and a system with 99 bodies...then I can hang up my HOTAS.I guess I'm a typical "planet eater". Whenever I come across systems with more than 50 bodies, my heart beats faster and I scan them all, without rhyme or reason. Outside the explored regions, hardly anyone is likely to find a system I have explored incompletely scanned. If someone wants to hate me for that, I can live with it.![]()
Some day I'll go back and complete the rest of the galaxy.Those players who "hunt" for valuables so they can put their name in "first discovered by" are despicable, not true explorers.