Irrelevant content

[Riverside]

I've been a member of the internet from the early days of it being available to the general public, so used to much more than this site could ever produce

Yeah. Just pick the bits that are interesting & ignore the rest Different people like different things

 

[LeoBartlet]

I resent this completely accurate observation.

I get the sense the real motivation for this thread was to give you stuphz but OP was too shy to say so.

 

[PRORABBIT67]

 

[rOmiLaYu]

I resent this completely accurate observation.

 

[Maximillian Forrest]

Taxidermy fox agrees.

Well, taxidermy fox is long dead and badly stuffed, so doesn’t actually have a say in this thread! I would go so far as saying he would look better put in a decent grave than posted on the internet.

 

[Dommarraa]

I've been a member of the internet from the early days of it being available to the general public, so used to much more than this site could ever produce

The OP should be gratefull. In the days of SuperJanet and Dial in BB, all we had was the ascii todger

 

[Riverside]

The OP should be gratefull. In the days of SuperJanet and Dial in BB, all we had was the ascii todger

The internet's really gone downhill since it became easy enough to use that even those with some social skills could access it for sure.

 

[LeoBartlet]

The internet's really gone downhill since it became easy enough to use that even those with some social skills could access it for sure.

We'd miss you if you weren't here though.

 

[Agony_Aunt]

SuperJanet

Oh, look at Mr. Fancy Pants here with SUPER Janet. We had plain old Janet and damn well enjoyed it!

And we visited sites by entering IP addresses! I bet you even had a working DNS!

 

[robbyp]

In the good old days, back in 90's, only people with IT skills could use the internet. Then we only talked about geek stuff. It was bliss.

 

[PRORABBIT67]

 

[Riverside]

In the good old days, back in 90's, only people with IT skills could use the internet. Then we only talked about geek stuff. It was bliss.

On the bright side, there are fewer complaints about wasting bandwidth now

 

[Maximillian Forrest]

On the bright side, there are fewer complaints about wasting bandwidth now

I agree, it's just time wasting scrolling through it now.

 

[Lord Rak]

 

[rrobes]

Game is at a critical junction, FD has over-reached with Odyssey and delivered a flawed product.

IMHO, Odyssey is a re-tread, suits instead of ships, same game play, shoot/scoop/scan/carry/grind/buy/engineer. Doesn't move me to buy this DLC.

FD is in a box, it has to work within the game capabilities. So this is what we've got.

I don't care to go through a new grind, it holds no interest. Not playing but waiting for further developments.

Those that are commenting may be using humor/satire/sarcasm to get through these times, holding out for improvements.

 

[Bottom Hat]

To be fair to taxidermy fox, he is his own fox, and he will foxing well put his foxy face on the interwebz if he wishes to.

For taxidermy fox' sake.

Now, does you haz any stuphz worf hazzing?

 

[Bottom Hat]

The internet's really gone downhill since it became easy enough to use that even those with some social skills could access it for sure.

I also resent this assertion - I have no social skills. Just look at me...

 

[MickyG1982]

In the good old days, back in 90's, only people with IT skills could use the internet. Then we only talked about geek stuff. It was bliss.

Now every person and their dog claim to be code monkeys to make their opinion better than all the others...

 

[Maximillian Forrest]

Now every person and their dog claim to be code monkeys to make their opinion better than all the others...

I agree to a great extent to what you say, although you need to remember that there are things members (like myself) have done in their early computer years which aren't going to be found during a Google search. To even reveal your real identity to any illegal activity (no matter how minor) would be suicidal given most of the software houses are still active. If you feel this is over the top, then hack a program to the point it deprives the original developer revenue and put your real name to it, and see the consequences.

 

[Ferry_25]

I resent this completely accurate observation.

Indeed. Let me, for once, stay on topic. I have a dying theoretical question, mr Hat. In the hypothetical case I would want to give you stuff. How would we make that a possibility?

Excuse me: stuph... My bad.