Ok, so basically the answer is you don't know and it's just supposition in your part. Got it.
Should probably consider reporting him for copyright infringement.
Ok, so basically the answer is you don't know and it's just supposition in your part. Got it.
So, what you are proclaiming is that, due to the underwhelming response to the launch of EDO on PC, that the PC players are smart enough to resist purchasing the expansion, but that the 10 million or so new generation console players are champing on the bit, desperate to buy an expansion that 100's of millions of smart PC players are rejecting?
Edit: Clarity
I learn rapidly, usually by example.That's a bit of a leap you've made there.
Ok, so basically the answer is you don't know and it's just supposition in your part. Got it.
Me on the other hand, I've barely noticed any improvements while playing for a few hours last night. It's playable for me, sure, but frames still vary wildly, they still drop below 60fps on-foot more often than not (unless I'm in a barren, featureless environment or look at the floor/sky, sometimes not even that), well into the low 30s.So far, my initial tests have seen a noticeable improvement in performance. Concourses especially seen to have benefitted, but my first ground CZ test also had far fewer framerate drops, resulting in an overall more stable and enjoyable experience.
Not bad for what was probably only 2-3 weeks of dev time.
Or StarField for the Xbox/PC crowd (sorry PS!). Fingers crossed it's actually good!Once GTA VI drops, who cares?
Or StarField for the Xbox/PC crowd (sorry PS!). Fingers crossed it's actually good!
It won't start generating sales. This is an older game now in a category that's not popular anymore. Gamers are damned picky about their games, as they should be. Look at the dismal sales of Battlefield 2042 which could have been a blockbuster but for the terrible direction the devs took the game and the bugs that got past any testing, and gamers want no part of it.The PlayStation 5 has sold 17.85 million units in 14 months, while the Xbox Series X|S sold 11.82 million units.
That's a potential sales pool of almost 30 million CMDRs all looking for a new experience - maybe that's Odyssey?
Odyssey has disappointed sales-wise (how many of the PC sales went 'free' to LEPers? LEP money spent long ago). It needs to start generating sales, so that Frontier can continue developing and supporting the game.
No changed what I said/asked around to be about something else.Engaged with your post and taken it seriously you mean?
I didn't avoid the question. My answer hadn't changed. I showed you what my answer was.Strange... same way that Frontier replies (many times) to the customers.
How to avoid questions 101.
Sure, but people would still ask how long it's going to take Frontier to get there. And people will still get differing performance on machines, as I previously said.The vast majority of these threads that I've participated in have resulted in myself and/or others recognising that "Console, When?" is not a question we can reasonably expect to be answered right now but "what is needed from the PC version for console to be considered viable" is.
Knowing that performance target would also help PC CMDRs decide if that performance is worth waiting for or if they would rather upgrade / move on.
Information == Ability to make choices.
3 platforms sell more than 1. Bit of a skewed comparison. Though Elite on a Switch would be cool.How much longer can Frontier throw free development effort at the PC version of Odyssey without releasing on gaming's primary retail environment (Console)?
We know that they said they were.Are they still planning a console release? We don't know that, we just know that it's put on hold pending review, and pending some vague, unquantifiable goal being reached.
As a reminder, Benzies, Houser, and everyone else who was the soul of that series is gone and we're in the age of ESG "investing". It's a game people will wish was never released.Once GTA VI drops, who cares?
Of course there is hope for Frontier, Nothing to do with that.If you can't see the irony of you last comment to me, then there is no hope for Frontier.
It won't start generating sales. This is an older game now in a category that's not popular anymore. Gamers are damned picky about their games, as they should be. Look at the dismal sales of Battlefield 2042 which could have been a blockbuster but for the terrible direction the devs took the game and the bugs that got past any testing, and gamers want no part of it.
And that game is in one of the most popular game categories. Good FPS games sell well.
Spaceship-flying games do not anymore. They don't have mass appeal. And because Odyssey is still suffering from performance issues it hurts it even more.
That's just my opinion
As a reminder, Benzies, Houser, and everyone else who was the soul of that series is gone and we're in the age of ESG "investing". It's a game people will wish was never released.
No, we might do some educated guesses.
The number of gamepass subscribers is more or less public since MS likes to brag about it and the list of XB games included in the GamePass is also public
No suppositions involved here.
That is all we know. You assuming that a delay means they've decided to drop the game on console is one that only can come from yourself. If you want to believe it's been canned then that's up to you. I choose to believe what I was last told.
There's no hope for that one I'm afraid.There is hope ... (Benzies latest venture)
'Consoles' is the major discussion here.
They (and you) won't define console, because they can't commit the release for ALL consoles, so it's easy say: Committed to console.
I didn't change what you said. You inferred that a toxic forum could make Frontier employees wellbeing suffer so I asked it that was the case.No changed what I said/asked around to be about something else.
But yes they have previously been affecting staff, and no Frontier didn't shut them down