this isn't exactly a research group or an academic debate. starting from the very op which is plain nonsense ... in gibberish form. of course entire branches of the conversation, if you could even call it such, are skipped. wild guess, 97,2% of participants only have seen 2,8% of the thread, like the vast majority of threads counting more than 3 pages.
people just drop in here because the 'web 3.0 social activity tab' bombards them with alerts, have a good laugh, then leave. and it goes on and on and on ...
and it's fun, and thus it's ok! call it künstliches gespräch.
I read the entire post and have some sympathy for the OP, who's obviously struggling in English and admitted to having suffered a stroke at some time, so yeah, maybe reading the entire thing will clue you in to the OP's intent. I don't mind a bit of fun but I usually avoid trying to lessen others whatever the circumstances.
Last edited: