Hypothetical question for all the fanboys and white knights in the thread: exactly what would it take for you to be critical of FDev? Lay that out for us so we can see if your opinion is worth anything at all, because if you're willing to uncritically accept anything they do it's not. If there is a point at which you'd change your tune, consider that supporting the legitimate grievances that other players have - even if they're less important to you personally - is your best option to stop things from degenerating to that point.
Can you maybe directly address these supposed white knights? For example, I've been accused of being a white knight a lot, despite clearly being critical of FD's QA in this case, and plenty of other stuff in the past. However, just because someone feels A or B has been done wrong poorly by FD, doesn't mean you should blindly accept other criticism that you disagree with.
Personally I despise this 'they should apologize' nonsense. The entire existence of the Gnosis is a freebie from FD they had no obligation to do. The fact they can actually have it jump on Canonn's request is a freebie. That they create an entire new game event, which caught many by surprise, is ' cool. Yes, mistakes were made. Its fine to point it out. But this entitled horsecrap from mentally unstable manchildren is disgusting, and it is perfectly fine to point that out too.
The idea that anyone who doesnt mindlessly join the lynching mob, over a computer game, for an in-game event FD had no obligation to facilitate in any way whatsoever, is a white knight is just a weak ad hominem.
Last edited: