Long games and bing TV shows has ruined movies for me, LOL. Even the three hour Endgame movie felt too short and rushed in comparison.
Thats "books" for me. Good books are as rare as good movies but they do have the advantage that they usually manage to set up amtopshere and situation correctly while a movie has to cram everything into 90 or 120 minutes. logic and all be damned. Its especially hard for book adaptations. There is not a single movie based on a novel that I would consider "good". They are all cut, are missing critical scenes/situations and often focus more on the BAM then on the story.
Kinda like AAA games today. Most of them hardly offer any improvements over their prequels and the most impressive feature usually are the special effects. I recently went and watched Captain Marvel before I m going to watch Endgame and I cannot believe that movie was received well....its just trash IMO but hey....Transformers also brings ini big bucks and I dont really know why.
In game development superb visuals are not cheap. And even with advanced game engines offering better stock quality in graphics providing good visuals is a time and money intensive thing. So its no wonder that most "great looking games" today come out offering basic or too short gameplay. I rather have less impressive visuals but a more complex game.
Same for books. I can easily do without CGI and special effects....my imagination usually is more impressive anyway and a good book is able to nourish my mind whereas a movie is like a quick drug....exorbitantly expensive, over too quickly and it doesnt satisfy you.