Update: Metacritic user score has fallen to 7.4. It is now in the yellow.
Who cares?
Seriously I don't give a flying <insert swear word> about what rating the game gets on some silly site.
Update: Metacritic user score has fallen to 7.4. It is now in the yellow.
lmao, so many 10/10 votes there, obviously not a great source of accurate critique. ED has a great base engine, superb sound and graphics, but as an overall game its half baked, so 5/10 is fair. Metacritic, ppppfffffffft.
EDIT: to be fair I am leaving plenty of room for FD to improve. In my book you don't go from a 10/10 to a 10/10.
You go from a 5/10 to a 10/10.
Update: Metacritic user score has fallen to 7.4. It is now in the yellow.
Update: Metacritic user score has fallen to 7.4. It is now in the yellow.
Hahaha too true! So many 0/10 votes also. Both set of reviewers aiming to counter-balance the other, blooming pointless.lmao, so many 10/10 votes there, obviously not a great source of accurate critique... Metacritic, ppppfffffffft.
Just throw out the 10's and the 1's and you have your real average scores. Either end is an extreme view that is slanted by some personality issue without reason.
Honestly with ED the user score is completely useless. So far it's mostly made up of long time fans giving the thing a 10/10, which is obviously not representative of the real quality and state of the game. I mean for crying out loud we've seen a bunch of people even in this thread saying that they're giving it a 10 just to balance out some 0 scores... Talk about a useless system...
Yes take the average of a large number of estimates and you get pretty close the real figure.
This has been demonstrated with 'Guess the number of jelly beans in the jar' type competitions. The more people guess the closer the average comes to the actual count, often to within one jelly bean.
It's called the 'Wisdom of the Crowd" phenomenon.
Erm, you have just compared Elite to a jar of jelly beans.
The process of "rating" is quite different to the process of "guessing".