More Likes Relationships

VSSEMike

V
Gondwana said:
What is really bugging me is the extreme attitude of Therizinosaurus. It's like one of the hyper aggressive hybrids. It doesn't make sense at all that it hates even very small species like Dryosaurus and Homalocephale.
This situation is comparable to a T. Rex hating a Compy, or a lion hating a mouse.

Please consider making the Therizinosaurus like/tolerate very small species like Dryosaurus, Homalocephale, and Compsognathus. It's fine if it hates everything else, but it just doesn't make sense for it to actively hate the tiny ones for said reasons.
Click to expand...

Therizinosaurus is not a hybrid, but it is known to be extremely territorial of the herbivores when comparing to Pachycephalosaurus.

Apart from Dryosaurus; Therizinosaurus should also like Gallimimus and Homalocephale since their fossil discovery was in Nemegt Formation in Gobi Desert of Mongolia as well as their food preference for Ground Leaf.
 

Xplodenator

Xplodenator
Gondwana said:
What is really bugging me is the extreme attitude of Therizinosaurus. It's like one of the hyper aggressive hybrids. It doesn't make sense at all that it hates even very small species like Dryosaurus and Homalocephale.
This situation is comparable to a T. Rex hating a Compy, or a lion hating a mouse.

Please consider making the Therizinosaurus like/tolerate very small species like Dryosaurus, Homalocephale, and Compsognathus. It's fine if it hates everything else, but it just doesn't make sense for it to actively hate the tiny ones for said reasons.
Click to expand...
I actually dont really have any problem with Theri hating everything
 

luispaistallon

L
I think that the next relationship between dinosaurs should this:

  • Theri should like Galli, Homalo and Dryo and vice versa( If not only Galli and Homalo)
  • An ankylosaurid/nodosauridar should like 2 specific ankylosaurid/nodosauridae( Similar to Gigantspinosaurus likes Huayangosaurus and Chungkingosaurus)
  • Parasaurolophus and Maiasaura like each other (like in the previous uptade. I don´t know why they remove this)
  • Parasaurolophus and Corythosaurus like each other (like JPIII)
  • Pteranodon should like Dimorphodon or Geostenbergia.
  • Pachy likes Stygy. Stygy likes Dracorex and Dracorex likes Pachy.
 
Last edited:

VSSEMike

V
luispaistallon said:
I think that the next relationship between dinosaurs should this:

  • Theri should like Galli, Homalo and Dryo and vice versa( If not only Galli and Homalo)
  • An ankylosaurid should like 2 specific ankylosaurid( Similar to Gigantspinosaurus likes Huayangosaurus and Chungkingosaurus) Can be with crichtonsaurus
  • Parasaurolophus and Maiasaura like each other (like in the previous uptade. I don´t know why they remove this)
  • Parasaurolophus and Corythosaurus like each other (like JPIII)
  • Pteranodon should like Dimorphodon or Geostenbergia.
  • Pachy likes Stygy. Stygy likes Dracorex and Dracorex likes Pachy.
Click to expand...

Good idea.

When it comes to ankylosaurid liking other ankylosaurids, what do you have in mind? We would like to hear it.
 

luispaistallon

L
VSSEMike said:
Good idea.

When it comes to ankylosaurid liking other ankylosaurids, what do you have in mind? We would like to hear it.
Click to expand...
In the case of Nodosauridae, Nodosaurus shold like Polacanthus and Sauropelta. The other 2 only should like Nodosaurus.

With Ankylosauridae Ankylosaurus should like Crichtonsaurus and Euoplocephalus. The other 2 only likes anky.

One of these two options, not both.

With the changes of cohabitation that i propose, there should be no more cohabitation in the game after that. This is enough in my opinion.
 

VSSEMike

V
luispaistallon said:
In the case of Nodosauridae, Nodosaurus shold like Polacanthus and Sauropelta. The other 2 only should like Nodosaurus.

With Ankylosauridae Ankylosaurus should like Crichtonsaurus and Euoplocephalus. The other 2 only likes anky.

One of these two options, not both.

With the changes of cohabitation that i propose, there should be no more cohabitation in the game after that. This is enough in my opinion.
Click to expand...

Agreed.

Polacanthus and Sauropelta share the same food preference. The same goes for Euoplocephalus and Ankylosaurus.
 

KingPhantom

KingPhantom
luispaistallon said:
With the changes of cohabitation that i propose, there should be no more cohabitation in the game after that. This is enough in my opinion.
Click to expand...
i like cohabitation but i also think its too much. there should be some logical but not too much.

i am thinking of a cohabiation setting tied to the difficult level. more cohabitation on easy and less to none on jurassic.
 

VSSEMike

V
Francesca Falcini said:
Dinosaur cohabitation
  • Parasaurolophus and Maiasaura are now friendly to each other
  • Pyroraptor now dislikes Scorpios Rex and Indominus Rex
  • Australovenator now dislikes Scorpios Rex
Click to expand...

What do you guys think of the following cohabitation-likes-relationship amendments? It is primarily for the first-five challenge modes in Jurassic difficulty and secondarily in the Sandbox gameplay.

For the Northwest USA challenge mode:
  • Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus
  • Albertosaurus and Qianzhousaurus

For the Southwest USA challenge mode:
  • Kentrosaurus and Wuerhosaurus
  • Wuerhosaurus and Stegosaurus
  • Kentrosaurus and Stegosaurus

For the Germany challenge mode:
  • Stygimoloch and Pachycephalosaurus
  • Minmi and Polacanthus
  • Minmi and Sauropelta
  • Polacanthus and Sauropelta
  • Pachyrhinosaurus and Torosaurus
  • Pentaceratops and Nasutoceratops
  • Torosaurus and Triceratops
  • Gallimimus and Therizinosaurus
  • Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus
  • Diplodocus and Dreadnoughtus

Here are the general likes relationships:
  • Pachycephalosaurs, hadrosaurs, ornithomimids, and ceratopsians
  • Corythosaurus, Edmontosaurus, Maiasaura, and Parasaurolophus
  • Pteranodon and Geosternbergia

Due to the give-and-take logic, I am not sure if anyone is okay with the dislikes relationships:
  • Pachycephalosaurs and stegosaurs
  • Chasmosaurus and Nasutoceratops
  • Nasutoceratops and Styracosaurus
  • Pachyrhinosaurus and Pentaceratops
  • Pentaceratops and Styracosaurus
  • Pentaceratops and Torosaurus
  • Pentaceratops and Triceratops
 

DragonNTiger

D
VSSEMike said:
What do you guys think of the following cohabitation-likes-relationship amendments? It is primarily for the first-five challenge modes in Jurassic difficulty and secondarily in the Sandbox gameplay.

For the Northwest USA challenge mode:
  • Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus
  • Albertosaurus and Qianzhousaurus

For the Southwest USA challenge mode:
  • Kentrosaurus and Wuerhosaurus
  • Wuerhosaurus and Stegosaurus
  • Kentrosaurus and Stegosaurus

For the Germany challenge mode:
  • Stygimoloch and Pachycephalosaurus
  • Minmi and Polacanthus
  • Minmi and Sauropelta
  • Polacanthus and Sauropelta
  • Pachyrhinosaurus and Torosaurus
  • Pentaceratops and Nasutoceratops
  • Torosaurus and Triceratops
  • Gallimimus and Therizinosaurus
  • Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus
  • Diplodocus and Dreadnoughtus

Here are the general likes relationships:
  • Pachycephalosaurs, hadrosaurs, ornithomimids, and ceratopsians
  • Corythosaurus, Edmontosaurus, Maiasaura, and Parasaurolophus
  • Pteranodon and Geosternbergia

Due to the give-and-take logic, I am not sure if anyone is okay with the dislikes relationships:
  • Pachycephalosaurs and stegosaurs
  • Chasmosaurus and Nasutoceratops
  • Nasutoceratops and Styracosaurus
  • Pachyrhinosaurus and Pentaceratops
  • Pentaceratops and Styracosaurus
  • Pentaceratops and Torosaurus
  • Pentaceratops and Triceratops
Click to expand...
Ehh... sounds like your just trying to make a particular game mode easier... and most of these pairings don't make much sense... a lot of like relationships are suggested based on natural cohabitation... these are more like "they are similar, so they should like each other" which is often the reason they don't like each other; they compete for the same resources.
 

Gondwana

Gondwana
Yeah lol. How about no? dude went and suggested almost all species liking each other just to make Challenge mode easier, which as it name suggests, should pose a challenge.
 

VSSEMike

V
DragonNTiger said:
Ehh... sounds like your just trying to make a particular game mode easier... and most of these pairings don't make much sense... a lot of like relationships are suggested based on natural cohabitation... these are more like "they are similar, so they should like each other" which is often the reason they don't like each other; they compete for the same resources.
Click to expand...
Francesca Falcini said:
Ceratopsids can now cohabit with other Ceratopsids, with certain exceptions
  • Triceratops can't cohabit with Styracosaurus, Torosaurus or Sinoceratops
  • Torosaurus can't cohabit with Styracosaurus, Pachyrhinosaurus or Sinoceratops
  • Styracosaurus can't cohabit with Sinoceratops
  • Sinoceratops can't cohabit with Pachyrhinosaurus
  • Nasutoceratops can't cohabit with Chasmosaurus or Pentaceratops
  • Chasmosaurus can't cohabit with Pentaceratops
Click to expand...

Generally in Jurassic difficulty challenge mode, the number of species required is large. It is not just the challenge mode, but also the sandbox mode for convenience. You do not expect that we always have the all-likes cohabitation setting when playing the sandbox mode. All-likes cohabitation setting is only applicable when doing an all-carnivores park or an all-herbivores park. It is impossible to make the ultimate Jurassic World using all the species in the entire game, whereas making the ultimate Jurassic Park is plausible. When it comes to theme-park simulation games in the Jurassic Park franchise, I always prefer seeing dinosaurs living in harmony. Even so, herbivores and carnivores are to be kept in separate enclosures.

When I did the Northwest challenge mode in Jurassic difficulty, it is inconvenient and that is the reason why I suggested the two pairs of cohabitation relationships. May I remind you that Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus belong to the carcharodontosaurid family. Albertosaurus and Qianzhousaurus are tyrannosaurs. Exhibiting these theropods separately consumes a lot of space. Still, carcharodontosaurids and tyrannosaurs have to dislike each other.

Due to having nearly similar food preferences; I thought it would be convenient if Kentrosaurus, Wuerhosaurus, and Stegosaurus like each other. The same can be said for Stygimoloch and Pachycephalosaurus. It would be better if the Early Cretaceous nodosaurids like each other.

Torosaurus and Triceratops disliking each other ABSOLUTELY makes no sense. Have a look at this thread:

Cohabitation Triceratops and Torosaurus

Hello, According to the game database, Triceratops and Torosaurus lived together. Can you add the cohabitation of these two species? Thank you.
forums.frontier.co.uk forums.frontier.co.uk

I am not expecting Chasmosaurus to like Nasutoceratops and Pentaceratops even when they have the same food preference; Chasmosaurus also should not cohabit with Sinoceratops. Same goes for Sinoceratops and Triceratops. I have no issue with Sinoceratops also disliking Pachyrhinosaurus, Styracosaurus, and Torosaurus.

Even with Chasmosaurus and Styracosaurus being preferred friends due to being discovered in the Dinosaur Park Formation; it is messed up seeing Chasmosaurus liking Torosaurus and Triceratops whereas Styracosaurus dislike those two even though the fossils of those four species are discovered in Alberta. Speaking of Alberta, Torosaurus and Triceratops are discovered in the Scollard Formation. By thinking deeper, Torosaurus being able to cohabitat with Nasutoceratops and Pentaceratops is due to the fact that Torosaurus' fossils are also discovered in Utah and New Mexico respectively but in different dig sites. Regarding Utah and New Mexico, Torosaurus' fossils were discovered in North Horn Formation and McRae Formation respectively.

Besides Chasmosaurus and Nasutoceratops currently; Pentaceratops should also dislike Pachyrhinosaurus, Styracosaurus, and Triceratops due to their different fossil discovery locations. Styracosaurus should not cohabit with Nasutoceratops due to different fossil discovery locations. Another thing to keep in mind is this: Styracosaurus is exclusive in the Jurassic Park era EVEN IF IT IS IN NOVEL FORM whereas Nasutoceratops and Sinoceratops are Jurassic World exclusives.

It would be better if Gallimimus and Therizinosaurus like each other due to being discovered in the Nemegt Formation as well as having the same food preference.

If Brachiosaurus like Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus; Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus should like each other. Diplodocus and Dreadnoughtus should like each other for the same food preference. Even with different food preference and despite being Late Cretaceous sauropods, I have no issue with Alamosaurus and Dreadnoughtus disliking each other. Though it is not challenge mode, would it be better if Amargasaurus and Nigersaurus like each other due to being Early Cretaceous sauropods having the same food preference?

The reason why I think stegosaurs and pachycephalosaurs should dislike each other is that these dinosaur types are of different time periods. Stegosaurs ranged from Mid-Jurassic to Early Cretaceous whereas pachycephalosaurs are only in Late Cretaceous.

The like-relationship between Geosternbergia and Pteranodon should be mutual, not one sided.
 

VSSEMike

V
Gondwana said:
Yeah lol. How about no? dude went and suggested almost all species liking each other just to make Challenge mode easier, which as it name suggests, should pose a challenge.
Click to expand...

I will make this loud and clear. I do not intend for almost every species to like one and another. For example, I have no intention for the three species ankylosaurids to like each other. Likes relationships between certain carnivores should be based on the same type. Herbivores' likes relationships are on food preferences and other types that they live with on the same place of fossil discovery. For example; pachycephalosaurs should like ceratopsians, hadrosaurs, ornithomimids, and ankylosaurs as they all lived together during Late Cretaceous.

I will not attempt the challenge mode in Germany in Jurassic difficulty until the cohabitation relationships are amended as follows:

  • THERIZINOSAURUS CAN COHABIT WITH GALLIMIMUS
  • APATOSAURUS CAN COHABIT WITH CAMARASAURUS
  • DIPLODOCUS CAN COHABIT WITH DREADNOUGHTUS
  • NASUTOCERATOPS CAN COHABIT WITH PENTACERATOPS
  • TOROSAURUS CAN COHABIT WITH PACHYRHINOSAURUS AND TRICERATOPS

The following cohabitation relationships are to be forgone. Certain likes relationships will have to become dislikes:

  • STYRACOSAURUS CANNOT COHABIT WITH NASUTOCERATOPS AND PENTACERATOPS
  • PENTACERATOPS CANNOT COHABIT WITH PACHYRHINOSAURUS, TOROSAURUS, AND TRICERATOPS
 

Gondwana

Gondwana
Almost none of your "arguments" make sense. And spamming this over and over won't get you anywhere either. You can't manage to play challenge mode on jurassic level and just want to make it easier by asking for like/dislike changes, which is pathetic. I'm out
 

VSSEMike

V
Gondwana said:
Almost none of your "arguments" make sense. And spamming this over and over won't get you anywhere either. You can't manage to play challenge mode on jurassic level and just want to make it easier by asking for like/dislike changes, which is pathetic. I'm out
Click to expand...

Have you done any basic research at all? Have you completed the Northwest USA Jurassic-difficulty challenge mode? I have no intention of spamming and some of the cohabitation relationships make no sense.

20230322090900_1.jpg


These are Jurassic-difficulty challenge modes I have completed so far. Under the challenge conditions, I have to suck it up when doing those in Jurassic difficulty and it is like "Hell Week". I have yet to try the challenge modes based on the first two Jurassic World films and I am waiting for new DLCs before attempting Canada and Southwest USA. However, I have limits when it comes to putting up in challenge modes. When I did the Jurassic-difficulty challenge modes in Northwest USA and Washington State Wreckage, I cannot take it anymore. What good is the result when the individual have not enjoyed the process of achieving it.

For new players who are to try Jurassic-difficulty Northwest USA challenge, I suggested the cohabitation relationships:

  • Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus liking each other.
  • Albertosaurus and Qianzhousaurus liking each other.

The following likes relationship will have to become dislikes:

  • Allosaurus and Metriacanthosaurus dislike each other.
  • Majungasaurus and Qianzhousaurus dislike each other.
  • Albertosaurus and Carnotaurus dislike each other.

Regarding Torosaurus and Triceratops, have a look at this article.

academic.oup.com

The record of Torosaurus (Ornithischia: Ceratopsidae) in Canada and its taxonomic implications

Abstract. The horned dinosaur genus Torosaurus has a challenging history, relating both to its geographic distribution and taxonomy. Whereas Torosaurus has
academic.oup.com academic.oup.com

I am becoming tired of voicing out and have said what needed to say, the Jurassic-difficulty challenge mode in Germany will remain undone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom