This is so cool!!!Look how far we have come in one year! I made the first image a year ago and the second one today. THIRTEEN species from near the top have gotten added in the last year!View attachment 362142View attachment 362141
Look how far we have come in one year! I made the first image a year ago and the second one today. THIRTEEN species from near the top have gotten added in the last year!View attachment 362142View attachment 362141
Any reason why the general animal list doesn't show lagomorphs or anseriformes? They have more votes in total than the last group in that list (lagomorphs have 49 votes in total and anseriformes more than 100, if you separate swans and ducks swans also have more than 80 votes in total)List updated!
Yes, they will be added to the general list as soon as you make an Iberian Ibex southeastern subspecies mod.Any reason why the general animal list doesn't show lagomorphs or anseriformes? They have more votes in total than the last group in that list (lagomorphs have 49 votes in total and anseriformes more than 100, if you separate swans and ducks swans also have more than 80 votes in total)![]()
And the hope is...we can knock out both the Tasmanian Devil and the Wolverine within the next two packs. I have less hope for the Secretary Bird but it's not impossible. Frontier really needs to step up on their habitat birds. They've done astoundingly great with the mammals and even the habitat reptiles.Look how far we have come in one year! I made the first image a year ago and the second one today. THIRTEEN species from near the top have gotten added in the last year!View attachment 362142View attachment 362141
Yes, they will be added to the general list as soon as you make an Iberian Ibex southeastern subspecies mod.
Tasmanian Devil and Wolverine... and more birds... in two packs? Hmm... how about:And the hope is...we can knock out both the Tasmanian Devil and the Wolverine within the next two packs. I have less hope for the Secretary Bird but it's not impossible. Frontier really needs to step up on their habitat birds. They've done astoundingly great with the mammals and even the habitat reptiles.
ETA: Bat-Eared Fox in the top 100! C'mon little guy, you can get there!
This is so coolLook how far we have come in one year! I made the first image a year ago and the second one today. THIRTEEN species from near the top have gotten added in the last year!View attachment 362142View attachment 362141
only the little blue penguin makes sense for this theme::Temperate Pack::
- Wolverine (3)
- Saiga (19)
- Patagonia Mara (27)
- Little Blue Penguin (56)
Not everything is biome based. Tropical pack was based on the Tropical Zone... a Temperate pack would be based on the Temperate Zone... it works perfectly, you're just misinterpreting the details.only the little blue penguin makes sense for this theme
saiga and mara are grassland and desert, wolverine is taiga and tundra
people on this forum mix up concepts of climate zones/latitudes and actual biomes
not at all, every animal in the tropical pack was actually from the tropical biome, they all had the tropical tagNot everything is biome based. Tropical pack was based on the Tropical Zone... a Temperate pack would be based on the Temperate Zone... it works perfectly, you're just misinterpreting the details.
Have you seen how Frontier define their biomes?you cant use the same limited term for different things in the same game, unless you define it by adding a second word to it, like "zone"
it will be confusing for the player
Exactly... what standards are they even using?! What defines "Tropical" or "Temperate" anyways? As far as I can tell they're not real life biomes... they're just a mash of basic biome concepts to simplify things.Have you seen how Frontier define their biomes?
i dont see how sarcasm is going to help in this discussionHave you seen how Frontier define their biomes?
actually they have a logic of their own, but devs sometimes make mistakes like in other sections of the game (like interspecies bonus inconsistencies)Exactly... what standards are they even using?! What defines "Tropical" or "Temperate" anyways? As far as I can tell they're not real life biomes... they're just a mash of basic biome concepts to simplify things.
Yes, I'm sure there is... the question is what is that logic? Looking at what is tagged what, is seems reasonable to assume things like "Temperate" means Temperate Zone as much as it means woodlands. We also don't have to make them more restrictive just because we don't understand it or there are consistency mistakes.actually they have a logic of their own, but devs sometimes make mistakes like in other sections of the game (like interspecies bonus inconsistencies)
we don't have to make them more complicated just bc we don't understand it or there are consistency mistakes
temperate zone includes forests, deserts, steppe, alpine and everything else you can think of but not all of these are temperate biome tagged in the gameYes, I'm sure there is... the question is what is that logic? Looking at what is tagged what, is seems reasonable to assume things like "Temperate" means Temperate Zone as much as it means woodlands.
two wrongs don't make a right thoWe also don't have to make them more restrictive just because we don't understand it or there are consistency mistakes.
This just brings up more questions than answers, like why did they call it Temperate (not a biome) if what they meant was Woodlands? Or Tropical if what they mean is Rainforests.temperate zone includes forests, deserts, steppe, alpine and everything else you can think of but not all of these are temperate biome tagged in the game
only deciduous forests/woodlands are, looking at animal and plant tags
excluding outliers or consistency mistakes of course