New ship: Panther Clipper

Looking at my "not in the next system" trade Cutter build, it can shift 688t of cargo c.200 LY without refuelling (five jumps); 40.35LY fully laden, with the return (no cargo) taking only 4 jumps. Put differently it's c.76t of cargo delivered "per jump" in the round trip.

If the cargo / (jumps per round trip) metric for the Panther Clipper Mk II is below that then it would be a less attractive option for middle distance trade. In the completely speculative estimate I posted earlier the 2000t of cargo would take 8 jumps out and 5 jumps back, so the metric would be 154t per jump. Also noting that the fully laden example would be able to do 13 jumps without refuelling, a total of c.340LY.

Which leads me to suspect that my 2,000t cargo capacity guess is a bit on the high side.

Yesterday's patch brought in the new take on your calculations (correct so far). It turned out that I've managed to make a fully functional and mega-productive Refinery with 20-30K of steel 'n all. And it happened in a large system, where I need to build weeks and weeks... now it's inside the system. The jump doesn't matter one bit.

And it's easily achievable. Two Refinery hubs on HMC and a Coriolis above.

i5EoNhb.png
 
The T10 isn’t that difficult from memory, the Beluga can be a pain because of the tail. - I didn’t fly one long enough to get used to it.
I used to fly a Beluga a lot in my PS4 days, really none of the large ships are all that hard to dock once you get a feel for "where" the ship is so to speak.

Edit: Like with the Beluga, you want to go in low, a lot of people go in high but like you said the fins with get stuck, and you can get surprising close with how low the bridge is.

Or just deploy the landing gear as that makes the fins fold down
 
Last edited:
MOD HAT WELL AND TRULY ON

It truly baffles me that people still think it's OK to go onto a game company's official forum, and post information obtained by hacking into the game files...

It's against forum rules, and the game's EULA. Just because "someone else did it" doesn't make it OK to spread it!


Also, let's not forget the most recent video doing the rounds saying it was going to be a medium ship because of datamined information, and how spectacularly wrong that was. If it's not official information, it doesn't belong here.
But ... but this time it's special 🥺
 
Back
Top Bottom