No Single Player offline Mode then?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Sorry, but that's not true. Forums are echo chamber. This is just a bunch of highly annoyed people. 99% of players really don't care about offline mode (they might care about single player mode, which is still there). It doesn't make hurt to go away but it's harsh truth people should recognise
But this small minority is the minority who FD asked for money, and who stumped it up big time.
 
Sorry, but this is one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever read in any forum ever. Honestly, it's not like Frontier popped out of the blue. Heck, most of their posts on Facebook/Twitter are about their other games. This is David Braben's baby. I'm sure he's not going to let it die without one hell of a fight. Just ask Ian Bell.

Oh I see what you did there; so my statement that FD, (nor any user in this forum), can predict how long their servers will last and can predict/guarantee when or even if the servers will go public domain is one of the most ridiculous statements you have ever read in any forum ever?

Logic and fundamental physical laws must send you into a tailspin?
 
AH.. then the news letter is alas a bit misleading then

Well, it requires regular check-ins for various transactions. Weapons purchases, missions, explorations, etc. etc.. It kind of doubles as an anti cheat method as well, so you don't see players running around in fully tricked out 'Condas or one of the larger, as-of-yet unreleased ships on day one.
 
For me, one of the most important things is ED told me when I purchased the game that I could play the game offline. If you want to play against other players, more power to you, but that has no appeal for me. I've played MMORPG's for years starting with Ultima Online and for the last 10 years World of Warcraft and the one major factor that has spoilt these games for me from time to time is the PvP aspect of the games. I feel no urge to competitively enter into combat with anyone because; I have no desire to have my rear end handed to me on a plate by some kid, especially seeing as this game seems to be very labour orientated, it would be heartbreaking to have all ones work undone because some nasty, spiteful little griefer has got nothing better to do than make someone's life miserable. You know that happens in Online games, it will happen here. Do people want this game to become an EVE clone? Some probably will.... but I don't. It's all about personal choices, if you choose to PvP players in a game, then surely one should have the opposite choice for the sake of balance and fairness. In World of Warcraft, if you don't want to get involved with PVP, you have the chance to join a NON PvP server. Sadly, this seems not to be the case with ED, everyone might get thrown in to the same pot and the nastiest, most skilful players will succeed. All power to them, if that's what they want from their game, but I for one will not pay a penny of my money to be their whipping boy. So, I hope that the game gives me my refund I've asked for. And, if in the future they have a change of heart about Offline gaming, they can let me know and I'll gladly pay for the game again. Sadly, and I know that I'm no loss to anyone...... This game isn't for me..... BEFORE its even started :(

You can still play solo. This will be entirely PvE then - no 'griefers' or other players.

Just that you will still need to contact the servers when buying, selling etc...
 
Sorry, but that's not true. Forums are echo chamber. This is just a bunch of highly annoyed people. 99% of players really don't care about offline mode (they might care about single player mode, which is still there). It doesn't make hurt to go away but it's harsh truth people should recognize.

I'm not for one second suggesting that it is the same case with Elite and Frontier (I really love the game, and think it will do well).

But what you just said was the exact same thing that was said about the SimCity and X-Rebirth forums, and look how all that turned out...

For what it's worth I agree that forums are usually an echo-chamber with a vocal minority. BUT sometimes a small fraction of voices can also represent the same opinions as held by the silent majority. There's not always an easy way to tell. Clearly though it is a risk Frontier are willing to take.
 
My heart like so many just sank into the floor today. Without an honest offline mode there is no game I own. When the servers close ( and they'll have too someday .. When ??? ) we have nothing ... We were sold this game with the promise of an offline mode and I for one am pretty gutted and even more so at the way it was done. For me the newsletter today was heartbreaking. We cannot guarantee how long Frontier can keep the servers going, and seriously what point is there in a boxed version of a game that only works when we are online. I'm sorry my extreme excitement for this game at Kickstarter has been a bit ruined today.

Anyone else feel like that moment when we first got premium beta is going to feel like the highlight ? Such a step backwards from Elite 2 - Frontier. Maybe they should have just updated the graphics and sound of First Encounters.
Sad,
Gary.
 
There *is* still going to be a solo-online mode.

However there is *not* going to be an offline mode. :(

Yes, I accidentally a word and that's what you jump on. This forum post is getting silly now.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

NO it's not the Solo but the OFFLINE mode. You can still play alone if you like you only need to be connected to the internet.

Yes, I accidentally a word and that's what you jump on. This forum post is getting silly now.
 
Michael, thanks for explaining the problem clearly.

Rather than worrying about not being able to abstract out this functionality, I think it might be good to plan to release a cut down server for offline players to run alongside their clients.

The main work then would be in optimising for performance, obfuscating / securing the interfaces and data (via encryption and probable data + message re-structuring) and the production of cut-down yet still usable data sets. Of course the data can bear no relation to the online galaxy and that online data would never be touched by offline players.

Rather than saying "probably not", couldn't this type of approach perhaps be checked for feasibility and estimated?
It could be seen as a stretch goal or even an expansion.

Really hope something can be done for the significant minority who really want to play but won't be able to connect to the full online experience.
I'd support something like this as an expansion, though it would add significant overhead to maintain going forward if it was delivered early in the game lifecycle. Obfuscating the secret data wouldn't work though - there is no means to protect it from malicious intent as DRM has found out.

As the game client evolves so the standalone server would need to be maintained and aligned. Both modes of operation would need to be tested for each release to ensure compatibility. The daily running costs would increase and the overall lifetime of the game would be shortened. Other features would suffer, be delayed, or less than anticipated as effort is diverted.

So as an "end of life" final expansion, with perhaps all that the players have discovered, a much simplified background economic engine simulation, and a much simplified encounter based engine might be feasible. End of life is the hardest thing to consider where we are at the moment in the journey, however plans made now can shape the decisions and the work over the next few years and make an "end of life" achievable activity.


Part of my day to day job recently has been working on "end of life" for technology implemented 10 years ago (retiring an OS as a platform is not a trivial activity!), so I have every sympathy and some understanding of the thoughts behind the decision process at Frontier to get to this point.
 
Yes, I accidentally a word and that's what you jump on. This forum post is getting silly now.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -



Yes, I accidentally a word and that's what you jump on. This forum post is getting silly now.

I wasn't attacking you mate... :) I just thought you had the wrong end of the stick, and was trying to help you out. :) No harm done. I'm on your side.
 
I'm not for one second suggesting that it is the same case with Elite and Frontier (I really love the game, and think it will do well).

But what you just said was the exact same thing that was said about the SimCity and X-Rebirth forums, and look how all that turned out...

For what it's worth I agree that forums are usually an echo-chamber with a vocal minority. BUT sometimes a small fraction of voices can also represent the same opinions as held by the silent majority. There's not always an easy way to tell. Clearly though it is a risk Frontier are willing to take.

Applying some logic....no, not really. Majority of people bought game for online, and in fact complaining much louder all over the place when it doesn't work properly (which is another story for another day :)).

As I said, it hurts but that's truth.
 
I doubt that would work, he can't even get a mobile signal in his house he has to go into the back garden to make a phone call lol. But hey.. You're going to suggest he moves house now huh?

I'd suggest that they should have read the "Computer Requirements" section. It clearly says you need an internet connection, and always has done. They'll need it to register the game when they first load it, for a start.
 
Oh I see what you did there; so my statement that FD, (nor any user in this forum), can predict how long their servers will last and can predict/guarantee when or even if the servers will go public domain is one of the most ridiculous statements you have ever read in any forum ever?

Heck, the sun could flip out and kill all electronics on the planet tomorrow, sure. Or we could be invaded by tiny green men (a bit more unlikely, I'll admit). But honestly, there are still servers running for games that came out in 1992... So chicken littleing over a server shutdown that might happen sometime is not that logical...

Logic and fundamental physical laws must send you into a tailspin?

He said to the student of Astrophysics... (Okay first year, but still...)
 
Until it needs to retrieve data from the server or moderate a transaction.

Michael

Ahhhhh... Mikey, you crack me up! Nice poltico speak! Until it actually needs to do anything to make the game work. So, if you go offline... Enjoy it for a minute or two. And FD don't care!

Is that the intended message? Cos that's what I read!
 
He's not a very good friend then - I'm sure he can find something else to play on his £700 machine. Yes he might be disappointed but it's not your fault.

But it was his choice to spend £700 extra for this game

The Frontier defence force is working well today, I see there is no point going on with this, I already said he spent that money only for this game, not to play something else but hey you can play and I can play so we shouldn't give a damn for the people that can't.
 
Game hasn't even released yet and people are crying about the servers going down.




"Only two things are infinite in Elite, the universe and drama-creation excuses, and I'm not sure about the former." --Albert Einstein.
 
er, its not like its 'months/years' of work, its has been working in offline mode up until now

It has not been working in offline mode up until now, it is still online. You have solo mode, that will not be going away. But it still requires a connection to the servers.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom