Non-Lethal ACU actions only?

There will be no killing, no blood, noting of that kind. This has to be All Audiences approved so no parents can claim their kid was traumatized.

To use a ED term, literal Carebear atmosphere.

(too bad AFAIC but hey, it's not my money invested in the game or the copyright)
 
There will be no killing, no blood, noting of that kind. This has to be All Audiences approved so no parents can claim their kid was traumatized.

To use a ED term, literal Carebear atmosphere.

(too bad AFAIC but hey, it's not my money invested in the game or the copyright)

Well...I mean, the dinosaurs can kill the guests, other dinosaurs and goats.

The rating system says it's for people aged 16 and over. If you're old enought to drive in America, and you're old enought to go and see the Jurassic World movie; you're old enough for SOME blood.
 
Last edited:
I hope JPOG's "retire" option comes back so you can delete your unwanted dinosaurs by shooting them.

Extra points if the gun model switches from the tranquiliser rifle to Owen Grady's .45-70 levergun.
 
I hope JPOG's "retire" option comes back so you can delete your unwanted dinosaurs by shooting them.

Extra points if the gun model switches from the tranquiliser rifle to Owen Grady's .45-70 levergun.
While the dinosaurs can kill each other through fights, ACU can’t kill the dinosaurs. It's a Universal Studios stipulated rule.
 
The raptors should be DEADLY. And kill even when not hungry. So maybe you can make a special paddock for them (well, you should) and then "retire" unwanted dinosaurs to there... a la the *Circle of Life* (cue Lion King song).
 
The raptors should be DEADLY. And kill even when not hungry. So maybe you can make a special paddock for them (well, you should) and then "retire" unwanted dinosaurs to there... a la the *Circle of Life* (cue Lion King song).

A retirement paddock for old herbivores. :cool:
 
The raptors should be DEADLY. And kill even when not hungry. So maybe you can make a special paddock for them (well, you should) and then "retire" unwanted dinosaurs to there... a la the *Circle of Life* (cue Lion King song).

Not sure if this can be called humane exactly but a definite possibility.
 
Last edited:

Philip Coutts

Volunteer Moderator
If I have a T-Rex rampaging through my park eating / killing people I want to be able to use lethal force. Simple as that for me.
 
I believe it was Universal that said no lethal force on the Dinos. Yeah I think it's dumb. In JPOG we had a choice. We could dart them or use a bullet.
 
Of course with how expensive the Dinosaurs are I doubt you would to fly around and kill them.

Yeah, but I think the idea is more along the lines of when you have a pack of velociraptors on the loose and slaughtering guests, it's simply common sense to take the lethal action and put them down before the problem reaches the point where you're park/company would be forced to shut down. In that situation a lethal option isn't just practical, it's morally required in order to protect the lives of guests , as a tranquilizer is less accurate and could be especially difficult to use against a small fast-moving target.

Imagine how it would look for your park to be shown to have a bigger interest protecting it's property than in protecting the lives of visitors? It's why there have been armed guards in every Jurassic Park movie, and Jurassic World too! (Which is part of why I can't understand how Universal is against it, even if it were to require an animal to be rogue/the park to be in a state of emergency). Besides, it's not like it's impossible for the Dino's to die. What if one is sick and you can't cure it nor have the space to quarantine it? Putting it down would be the best way to protect other dinosaurs. There's just so many reasons to have it and so few good reasons not to, I hope it'll be possible to point at Universal's own movies and point out the flaw in the logic
 
Yeah, but I think the idea is more along the lines of when you have a pack of velociraptors on the loose and slaughtering guests, it's simply common sense to take the lethal action and put them down before the problem reaches the point where you're park/company would be forced to shut down. In that situation a lethal option isn't just practical, it's morally required in order to protect the lives of guests , as a tranquilizer is less accurate and could be especially difficult to use against a small fast-moving target.

Imagine how it would look for your park to be shown to have a bigger interest protecting it's property than in protecting the lives of visitors? It's why there have been armed guards in every Jurassic Park movie, and Jurassic World too! (Which is part of why I can't understand how Universal is against it, even if it were to require an animal to be rogue/the park to be in a state of emergency). Besides, it's not like it's impossible for the Dino's to die. What if one is sick and you can't cure it nor have the space to quarantine it? Putting it down would be the best way to protect other dinosaurs. There's just so many reasons to have it and so few good reasons not to, I hope it'll be possible to point at Universal's own movies and point out the flaw in the logic

Good point.
 
If I have a T-Rex rampaging through my park eating / killing people I want to be able to use lethal force. Simple as that for me.

Totally agree. I just wouldn't feel immersed at all after witnessing my T-Rex kill dozens of guests, whilst my security detail continued using non lethals.
 
Totally agree. I just wouldn't feel immersed at all after witnessing my T-Rex kill dozens of guests, whilst my security detail continued using non lethals.

Not only that, but something else I forgot about but saw on the Reddit forum, in Jurassic World they didn't just have sniper rifle like in JPOG, they used MINIGUNS and a ROCKET LAUNCHER in their security detail! I understand the current movie is all about dino protection, but hopefully referencing the first JW movie this is something that can change Universal's mind
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom