Well then maybe when they stop advertising their game as if it was our game we wouldn't have such a problem when they make stupid production decisions that inflict people with a hideous sense of buyer's remorse just hearing about them.
We were suckered in with a space sandbox for the 21st century made by people who basically invented the space sandbox. Are we supposed to be the a-holes when we pay in only to find out there's no sand? Come on, man, don't defend or tolerate anti-consumer practices from companies of any kind.
Why am I not allowed to defend a game that I enjoy?
Please, point to me where there are anti-consumer practices going on here?
There are plenty of games that I have bought that turned out that I didn't like. You know what I did? Moved on with my life and played something I enjoy.
If you don't enjoy the game, fine. It's not everyone's cup to tea, but why stick around on the forums to bash the game and the developers? and try to force your agenda on people who are enjoying the experience?
Perhaps, you should have done more research into the game before buying it? I wish I had with a number of games in the past.
My last game that I regretted buying was Watchdogs. It was advertised as a game that would change the world, and bring something new to the industry.
All it was, was a glorified GTA, with push X to hack.
But I didn't go on their forums for weeks/ months to bash everyone who liked the game.
I just uninstalled it and moved on. Perhaps people here should take the same approach.
It's not their game at all.
I'm staggered by this statement.
Of course it's their game. You are paying to play their game.
If you don't like it... move on.
A lot of us here do like the game. It shouldn't be completely changed just because a minority amount of people don't like it.
It's FD's game, it's their decision what to do with their game.
