Please give me an idiots guide to which faction I should choose

Okay, so in Fallout New Vegas terms, the three factions are like this, right? :)

  • The Federation = New California Republic.
  • The Empire = Caesar's Legion.
  • The Alliance = Mr. House (not a great fit there, but hey).

I'm a natural loner so I don't know how much I'll get involved with all this, but one big lure will be unique ships gained through (I assume) faction rep only. I hope we get some more teaser graphics about exactly what ships will be available to fly in the next 6 months, before the Gamma/Final when we can start choosing a side and building rep.

It would also help to know of choosing a side is exclusive, or if you can build rep with all factions simultaneously. Does anyone know?
 
You could of gather a group of guys around you and set up your own
and take over the others

if player reaction in game can decide the raise or fall of those set up by
ED then the code should work also for you ,
could be interesting to find out

MikeGreg

I'm all for resurrecting GalCop.
 
Factions ?

Hi all, sorry if this has been asked before, I did a couple of searches and nothing obvious in the titles (although I did find the ED tracker for a tenner post which I need to explore again :)).

Can anyone point me to a post or explain empire vs federation vs independent stuff, I only played the original elite and am a bit behind with the lore.

Does positive reputation with one mean negative with another automatically?

Are there exclusive ships, equipment etc?

Thanks
 
My take of the Idiots guide to Factions. Keep in mind this is my view of it, and each person has its own frame of reference and aspect of interpretation. Others may think of it as "propaganda", because they have a different frame of reference.

Federation:
The home of all Human Origins. Sol (our Solar system) is the capitol of the Federation, and as such, is the origin of all human expansion. As Human space began to spread out among the stars, it was the Federation that provided the terraforming and industrial bases, as well as assembled the space stations above each burgeoning new world.
In this way the Federation can be seen as the supporter of all star systems at their beginning. The countless billions in credits and region wide support and effort was given freely to each colony world, as a sign of the Federations beneficence.
While other factions mock the marketing and commercialization of the Federation, it is this very advertiser support that funds the economy and industry of the Federation to its current highest degree.
That the Federation does not abuse its power, nor withhold its aid, is a sign that the capitalism of the economy does not affect nor influence its governing or ruling agenda, which remains a beacon of human ideals.

Empire:
The empire used to be part of the singular Human [Federation] Space, but factionalized into its own governing body in a rebellion, military coup, and installment of an Emperor. From a Federation standpoint, they "went rogue" and simply seized all the Federation provided worlds and infrastructure for their own use.
This was for the Empire's own benefit (most specifically the Emperor's personal power himself), as a way to do things "the way they want to", free of the "tyranny of the Federation". This included slavery, among other practices that the Federation simply would not allow, or found.. distasteful.
The Empire is an empire even by name, and thus practices Imperialism: taking other people's lands and worlds through military force. As a result the empire is an aggressive and warlike faction, despite their high fashion sense and overzealous (dare I say decadent?) attempts at appearing respectable. The Empire is about growing, and is a source of conflict and upheaval to the region and its inhabitants.

The Alliance:
Similar to the Empire, the Alliance of Independent worlds each sought to cast off the rule of the Federation, which they saw as overbearing. That they were allowed to rebel (and keep all the Fed provided infrastructure) was an eye opener to other worlds, who then sought to go independent as well, only for private, personal reasons (most commonly greed).
Each world became its own little fiefdom, with its own little laws and customs, and the Alliance is a loose agreement between the independent worlds as a group to provide support and assistance to each other as best they are able.
As a Result, the alliance is a rough and tumble mix of random worlds and economies, Flinging their nose at the Fed, while still seeking to trade with and have equal political standings with them, as in the end the independent worlds cannot in fact support themselves or each other without Fed aid.


The Eranin Conflict:
Eranin used to be a Federation world, 30 years ago, but they rebelled, in a rather violent (if rag-tag) "freedom fighter" revolution. That they stole the Station, Starports, City infrastructures and Powerplants is beside the point.
Over these 30 years, a "cold war" of sorts was playing out, with the Feds trying to reclaim their world (and property), and the Eranin rebels reacting with violence. Yet the trade lanes were kept open, and overt military action was avoided.
Then recently the Eranin rebels started working on tampering with Progenitor cells in a black ops smear campaign, in an effort to destabilize the region, as well as cause suspicion among other Fed worlds, in the hopes of firing up other rebellions to take the attention away from Eranin.
That tampering with Progenitor cells amounts to biological warfare due to what the Progenitor cells do (heal, replace, and regrow body parts/organs), appears to be lost on most pilots of the region who chose to support them.


[see if you can tell what faction I support :D ]
 
Star Trek means I will always join the Federation, Star Wars makes me hate the Empire so all is good and clear in my universe.

Then, then they re-run Firefly.............:S
 
Federation: democracy based on beaurocratic, corporate, safe, political center of humanity values technology and stability (through any means whether overt or cover action)

Empire: autocratic social driven monarchy that is social class driven and strictly capitalist. Mostly safe in the core areas but often expands toward independent and unsafe areas. Genetic engineering and manipulation is not uncommon as well as more outdated practices such as rule by birthright and slavery.

Alliance: confederation of independent states with different forms of government favoring democracy and eguality over set social statuses or classes. Favors expansion through membership rather than conquest and in the late 3250s made significant strides toward achieving an unbiased level of understanding of the Thargoid species unlike the other two factions.

These are the facts make your choice.
Well put! :)
 
This is starting to stray dangerously into political commentary of the 21st century rather than the 34th. Please stick to facts and avoid locking the thread because new players deserve a guide of the factions.

No offence intended but why do Americans always assume political discussion is off limits? I understand politics in America is supposed to be quite polarized and acrimonious but the reaction I see towards political discussion online always struck me as odd. It almost seems as if a political disposition is assumed to be some inalienable right. That suggesting someone's wrong is some great offence. It's quite dysfunctional in my opinion.

From the little I've seen more discussion would do some good, it might stop some of the more bizarre thoughts from spreading unfettered such as the tendency to confuse liberalism with socialism.

I suppose you just don't want this to become off topic, which is fine, but how can you discuss future politics at all without referencing modern politics?
 
Last edited:
Commander splat

Thanks for all your answers I appreciate them all.
I have decided to stay independent for now and watch carefully from a distance
 

Jenner

I wish I was English like my hero Tj.
No offence intended but why do Americans always assume political discussion is off limits? I understand politics in America is supposed to be quite polarized and acrimonious but the reaction I see towards political discussion online always struck me as odd. It almost seems as if a political disposition is assumed to be some inalienable right. That suggesting someone's wrong is some great offence. It's quite dysfunctional in my opinion.

From the little I've seen more discussion would do some good, it might stop some of the more bizarre thoughts from spreading unfettered such as the tendency to confuse liberalism with socialism.

I suppose you just don't want this to become off topic, which is fine, but how can you discuss future politics at all without referencing modern politics?

I'm an American and a mod and I don't see that the discussion here has veered into off-topic territory. Drawing parallels between the present-day political landscape and the (pretend) politics of Elite is justified and totally understandable. Thus far I think this thread has been just fine with regards to staying on track. Obviously if the discussion becomes one solely concerned with real politics then that would be a different story.
 
Back
Top Bottom