But what then triggered Sandro to pull the open / weighted merits trigger, and (retrospectively or not) say they think Powerplay is consensual PvP?
PLEASE MAKE POWERPLAY IN "OPEN ONLY"
- Thread starter CMDR KOBAL
- Start date
But what then triggered Sandro to pull the open / weighted merits trigger, and (retrospectively or not) say they think Powerplay is consensual PvP?
I'm talking about multiplayer stuff that you get with a sub.
Robert Maynard
Volunteer Moderator
Which is all available in both of the game's multi-player game modes.
Robert Maynard
Volunteer Moderator
I don't know - he was maybe talking to some of the players who have formed Powerplay groups.
Which you get from a sub.
And we are talking about solo players who would be affected by The Op idea. Open powerplay only
I CAN'T afford a sub I can't play open and you want to take something away from me.
But it came from somewhere, do you agree? It means it was the result of some train of thought triggered by something that FD knew.
From my sample size of 1, 0% have subs
But while you can say its not a problem overall, it its a problem for anyone who doesn't sub. It basically becomes a paywall feature for them.
Would you say to the face of someone who can't afford a sub "Sorry, but this is for the good of the game, tough break being too poor to afford a sub"?
But as I suggested from your post, if you are module shopping, the modules will be in tech brokers. The PP bonuses these days are weak in comparison to raw moneymaking.
It is already multiplayer. Just not always direct. But if you are proposing that, then PGs are also multiplayer, so would you suggest they remove from solo but keep PG?
Let see. Exploration bonus 200% bonus even Bounty hunting 100%. bonus. Is that weak?
He's one person. Its not hard to imagine there are people on consoles doing PP who don't have a sub.
While its easy to get bogged down in how it affects people discussing things in this thread, its worth remembering there are a lot of players out there who don't get involved in forum discussions.
Like open only proponents grab any argument no matter how silly to support OO?
We can sit here dismissing each others' opinions as being silly if you want, but then we might as well just shut down the thread.
From my sample size of 1, 0% have subs
But while you can say its not a problem overall, it its a problem for anyone who doesn't sub. It basically becomes a paywall feature for them.
Would you say to the face of someone who can't afford a sub "Sorry, but this is for the good of the game, tough break being too poor to afford a sub"?
And from my sample size on the various discords everyone has a sub.
Would you say to the face of someone who can't afford a sub "Sorry, but this is for the good of the game, tough break being too poor to afford a sub"?
In the end its a business call for DB, just as he axed mac support. Which benefits the game in general? If it does then down comes the axe.
Yes, the silent majority who are either easily discounted when they are Open only, and vital when they are sub less console owners.
I can make billions in mining, and make the same as an R5 bonus in a few hours. Is that weak?
Robert Maynard
Volunteer Moderator
On consoles, yes.
No subs on PC - many pan-modal features; no single mode locked multi-player features either.
Are you talking about the discord that online?
A lot of people pick the Console because it a cheap family game system.
Let get the facts right. Mac did not support DirectX or some graphic drivers. So Frontier had to drop them. So that not FRONTIER fault. That was Apple fault.