Not really. I want all those things too. My first post on this thread was about the fact that it might enrich a game, esp on a small scale. I got the impression (probably wrongly - for which I apologise) that you were concerned that groups of players might try something a little more agressive en-masse and threaten the balance of the game?
no, if players want to band together to try to own a system or whatever i have no problem with that... talk to me nicely i may even join in. my concern is that that becomes the end goal of the game. must add that i do not think it will be the case.
I have no idea about FD's intent, other than what I have read (and forgotten) on the forum. I was merely being devils advocate in my 2nd post and not intendng to yank your chain. Merely suggesting how easy it would be to control a mass attempt to unbalance a game if FD wished to do so?
ok... i understand what you say. yes... given that it is their game.. fd can do whatever they like to maintain 'balance'. but i think (hope) that in the early stages, at least, fd will allow a certain amount of leeway to see what is possible.