Reasons why we should get the African Leopard

Alexjh

Alexjh
I personally propose what we need is the Leopard Pack
1707594802699.png


I mean to be fair, given an unlimited amount of DLC, I would genuinely like to see at least one more tropical form, but really low down the list on a finite addition countdown like we seem to be....
 

Fossa

F
Matyej167 said:
The African leopard is a very iconic predator, the most common and well know Leopard subspecies.

Also, if we get the African leopard, the Big 5 of Africa would be complete in PZ.
Click to expand...
Who cares, I mean, you can just imagine that the Amur Leopard is the African Leopard, not much difference, there is like a perfect mod for the African Leopard as well.
 

NachoB

NachoB
Fossa said:
Who cares, I mean, you can just imagine that the Amur Leopard is the African Leopard, not much difference, there is like a perfect mod for the African Leopard as well.
Click to expand...
Yeah leopard mods are gorgeous, but amur is basically the only leopard subespecies that is very visually distinct from the tropical leopards. Has thicker fur, rounder face, different eye shape and is fluffier/bulkier. All other leopards vary basically just in color.

Still another leopard is not a priority.
 

Fossa

F
I never cared for leopards in general, as a child I always liked the snow leopard, ocelot, serval, caracal, clouded leopard and jaguar most.

Still do.

Of the big three lion/tiger/leopard I actually prefer the beautiful tiger, but I still only want one ((siberian) tiger species in my zoo game rosters...

Lions are the Wolverine (x-men), scorpion (mortal kombat) and t.rex from the animal world, overused and overhyped bores, I never care for the most popular things
 
Last edited:

Alexjh

Alexjh
Fossa said:
Because that is the only tiger species I want in zoo games
Click to expand...
I mean, I think this is one I particularly disagree on - Bengal + Siberian is honestly the best solution because they are both iconic but have very different habitat preferences and distinct appearances. Both are common in Zoos and if anything I'd argue that being able to complete an iconic India setup with Bengal is more important than being able to complete a small corner of the Russian Far East with Siberian. Having both alleviates that, and while I'd agree that there are other absent cats that take priority (Ocelot, Serval, Pallas Cat etc) the same principle does still apply to a lesser degree with Leopard subspecies
 

Fossa

F
I would want this feature in planet zoo 2: skin selection for the mega clones.

These animals behave 100% the same as they do in nature anyway, but their story and appearace can be selected, so the main skin is Siberian Tiger, but you can select Bengal and all the other variety as skins, in this way better more unique species aren’t left out as theseboring mega clones take their spots, this is only for mega clones like the brown bears/grizzly/kodiak, tigers, lions, gorilla, giraffe, zebra, flamingo,leopard ect, not for animals like springbok/blackbuck, red crane/grey crane or markhor/ibex, ect, these aren’t mega clones
 

Fossa

F
DarkTemplar said:
But the slots for species offered by the Frontier are very limited , having one more tiger subspecies means less possibility for us to get more diverse animals like Secretary Bird, Tree Kangaroo, Black Howler etc.
Click to expand...
I don’t understand that people don’t understand that it is much better to get all the unique variety first, and then fill up the holes with these almost 100% clones. You can’t fake having a secretary bird in the game, you can easily fake having the asiatic lion instead of the African one
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom