Being large animals, hippos should absolutely require ample habitat space. As such, it makes sense that its land requirement is that high, at 1004 square meters+502 per additional individual (it may be slightly too high, but not by that notable of an amount)
But the fact that the water requirements are the same is absurd.
For comparison
The water requirement for a single hippo is the same as that of 15 sea lions.
The second highest requirement is that of the polar bear (720 square meters), who has intentionally absurd requirements to represent the difficulty of keeping them in captivity.
And the collective requirements of land and water mean that the hippopotamus requires the most additional space per added individual in 1004 square meters (502 for land and water each). More than polar bears (550 land+360 water=910 total) and more than the largest animal in the game, the African elephant (667 land+74 water=741 total)
And those requirements for water don’t make sense, with large hippo herds in captivity being content with far less.
In addition to making habitat design more difficult, as it requires the decoration of vast amounts of water, with fewer options than on land.
So, all in all, the water requirements of the hippopotamus should be lowered.
In my opinion, the base should be 300 square meters. 4th highest in the game, after polar bears, California sea lions and American beavers (which that requirement also sounds too high for the rodent…) and equal to grey seals and gharials.
To keep the water requirements per an additional individual the among highest in the game, I think it should be 100 square meters. Still very high, but not on an absurd level. Lower than polar bears and slightly lower than saltwater crocodiles (though it may be too high for the crocodilian…)
But the fact that the water requirements are the same is absurd.
For comparison
The water requirement for a single hippo is the same as that of 15 sea lions.
The second highest requirement is that of the polar bear (720 square meters), who has intentionally absurd requirements to represent the difficulty of keeping them in captivity.
And the collective requirements of land and water mean that the hippopotamus requires the most additional space per added individual in 1004 square meters (502 for land and water each). More than polar bears (550 land+360 water=910 total) and more than the largest animal in the game, the African elephant (667 land+74 water=741 total)
And those requirements for water don’t make sense, with large hippo herds in captivity being content with far less.
In addition to making habitat design more difficult, as it requires the decoration of vast amounts of water, with fewer options than on land.
So, all in all, the water requirements of the hippopotamus should be lowered.
In my opinion, the base should be 300 square meters. 4th highest in the game, after polar bears, California sea lions and American beavers (which that requirement also sounds too high for the rodent…) and equal to grey seals and gharials.
To keep the water requirements per an additional individual the among highest in the game, I think it should be 100 square meters. Still very high, but not on an absurd level. Lower than polar bears and slightly lower than saltwater crocodiles (though it may be too high for the crocodilian…)
Last edited: