Lucky it wasn't a kale quiche..It was a good job too, because I had to cook and eat broccoli after the livestream which was nasty.
Lucky it wasn't a kale quiche..It was a good job too, because I had to cook and eat broccoli after the livestream which was nasty.
I have an inbuilt reflex that makes me throw kale in the nearest bin, so I am safe.Lucky it wasn't a kale quiche..
Is that the bin that empties its contents into the kumo brand burger plant......I have an inbuilt reflex that makes me throw kale in the nearest bin, so I am safe.
That's just plain lazy, Rubber. I expected more from you. Time for the proverbial socks to be pulled up.Egg status, as in scrambled, boiled or fried.
Only thing I can think of is when a faction owned by a smaller player group (and possibly infiltrated by a 5c) starts trying to take over a larger player groups area, and then gets utterly stomped out of existence.As it stands... factions currently are 5C-proof right?
Well I haven't been myself since the announcement. I felt this funny warm feeling near my pancreas which I thought was diabetes but apparently is named 'hope' and I'm all turned about.That's just plain lazy, Rubber. I expected more from you. Time for the proverbial socks to be pulled up.
Ah, that old classic. One particular group got on my nerves so much I one man murderspanked them into the floor.and well, lets just say things kicked off.
Well all right. I'll let this one slide.Well I haven't been myself since the announcement. I felt this funny warm feeling near my pancreas which I thought was diabetes but apparently is named 'hope' and I'm all turned about.
Except players don't own factions. I get what you mean, but that's not a valid start position, ref: my comment "...and any player machinations which assume control of a faction is foolhardy" ... underpinning that statement is the since there's no actual player control or ownership, you can't really 5C it, since that's predicated by being part of or having control over something.Only thing I can think of is when a faction owned by a smaller player group (and possibly infiltrated by a 5c) starts trying to take over a larger player groups area, and then gets utterly stomped out of existence.
You named your tapeworm Hope?Well I haven't been myself since the announcement. I felt this funny warm feeling near my pancreas which I thought was diabetes but apparently is named 'hope' and I'm all turned about.
You named your tapeworm Hope?
Though by that line of argument Powerplay can't be 5C'd either, as the organised player groups certainly don't own the power and only control it to the extent that (as with the BGS) their in-game actions form part of a wider aggregate.underpinning that statement is the since there's no actual player control or ownership, you can't really 5C it, since that's predicated by being part of or having control over something.
I'm confused...the livestream was nasty?It was a good job too, because I had to cook and eat broccoli after the livestream which was nasty.
Dude, broccoli is for the devil. I take a fine kale stew over that any day. Broccoli is only useful to slap veganists around the ear with.Lucky it wasn't a kale quiche..
Nah... Powerplay is different, because pledging is reciprocal and affords access to levers that you wouldn't otherwise have access. Classic insider threat stuff. Sure, there's minimal gates to that access, but nonetheless... you can't give Torval bung expansions, when pledged to Aisling, and vice versa. Basically, if you aren't pledged, you can't sabotage expansion.Though by that line of argument Powerplay can't be 5C'd either, as the organised player groups certainly don't own the power and only control it to the extent that (as with the BGS) their in-game actions form part of a wider aggregate.
gasp I can't even put this excess into English words anymore.... Six sessions, seven worlds, and ten biological entities sampled.
I do like it partly, but I feel the light destroys it. I'd prefer the monochromous, high resolution... can we still call that wireframe? Controls and gauges and UI elements I don't mind, but the viewscreen should never be mixed, imo.A bit of last second perseverance netted me my final samples of Fundgoida on the most biodiverse world in this system, nearly sixteen kilometers from the first patch I found. I was about to abandon the search, but I decided take a quick peek over a last hill before rocketing away.
...
Nah... Powerplay is different, because pledging is reciprocal and affords access to levers that you wouldn't otherwise have access. Classic insider threat stuff. Sure, there's minimal gates to that access, but nonetheless... you can't give Torval bung expansions, when pledged to Aisling, and vice versa. Basically, if you aren't pledged, you can't sabotage expansion.
As opposed to BGS, which are public levers. Sure, you can achieve potentially similar effects, but it's the fact it's an internal threat is part of what makes it 5C. So you can 5C a player groups motives, but not a faction.
One saving grace being that the BGS (if kept) has at least some sensible mechanisms to keep 5C like stuff at bay. You have reputation hits to failing missions (like deliberate passenger fails) but the main danger will / would be from trade exploits which can be used without in game penalty, en masse and is my only real alarm bell.On some extent, BGS might be sabotaged as well... but 5C needs to know the plan in advance, so I'd say that's even more deceiful as 5C has to infiltrate to achieve its objective.
That's not really needed for PP, as deep damage may occur from external parties and at very high level (i.e. triggering turmoil etc) without being aware of the current power's plan.
Last but not least: if they'll get rid of held-but-not-redeemed merits even sniping could become a memory of the past.