Slave Carriers Update

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
I for one support the slavers choice, although I wouldn’t do it myself.... it’s emergent gameplay like this that makes the game fun!
I'd agree, untill I was at the end of the stick. These being new players, they are probably driven away in droves. Not something I'd want as a developer.

That said, I do admire the ingeniuity, I'd never even think about something like that...
 
Don't do it FDEV. "It's a cuthroat galaxy" "Blaze you're own trail" will ring hollow. First bit of emergent gameplay for years and it's going to be crushed :( This could have been great, slaver carriers vs liberator carriers, all tracking each other through the galaxy, battling for the souls of the gullible. Just let it alone FD.

And FWIW, as an exploration carrier owner, I can tell you that my carrier has a slave too. ME. How about you free me from my endentured servitude (upkeep and mining Petril or whatever they call it these days) while you are at it?
 
If it were me, I'd say that while this is borderline on the exploitation it's also unprecedented. Hand them a warning - or temp ban - but anyone else doing this in future is banned.

I don't know everything about this case, but on the surface it sounds like a pretty ingenious plan and one is have been fairly happy with if I'd thought of it. No game exploits were used. No different from any other in game deception. An outright ban seems harsh.

What I'd like to know is: how did the slaver(s) respond when "slaves" complained to them in game via comms? (If the slaves did indeed complain?) Were the slavers insulting or abusive? That might be one reason for a ban.
 
Nah, not buying it. Try playing something like ARK and see how that goes. Hell, it's a legitimate mechanic in there, and you only have to read the T&Cs to know FDev mean "in the real world", not in game.

Besides, I've never seen anyone excluded from a game mode before. Just "Open"? Hmm!
 
If it were me, I'd say that while this is borderline on the exploitation it's also unprecedented. Hand them a warning - or temp ban - but anyone else doing this in future is banned.

I don't know everything about this case, but on the surface it sounds like a pretty ingenious plan and one is have been fairly happy with if I'd thought of it. No game exploits were used. No different from any other in game deception. An outright ban seems harsh.

What I'd like to know is: how did the slaver(s) respond when "slaves" complained to them in game via comms? (If the slaves did indeed complain?) Were the slavers insulting or abusive? That might be one reason for a ban.
Why though? It's legit gameplay and teaches valuable lessons without harm done.

It required new players to listen to their "slavers" and fit their ship without a fuel scoop (lesson one: never skip on fuel scoops if landing on a carrier)
and most even told to fit 2D frame shifts (lesson two: you never go 2D frame shift, not even in PvP any more).
And the general lesson is, people can be jerks, don't trust randoms on internet. In german we have a saying for this "Gier frisst Hirn" (greed eats your brain).
Nothing except time is lost for the "slaves" here. It was all legit gameplay. No botting, no real money extortion*. Just people playing dumb other people.

And children should learn this lesson, too. The harm done here is comparatively small.

* in case those "slavers" asked for Arx or real word money etc. a ban would definitely be on the table though.

edit

Nah, not buying it. Try playing something like ARK and see how that goes. Hell, it's a legitimate mechanic in there, and you only have to read the T&Cs to know FDev mean "in the real world", not in game.

Besides, I've never seen anyone excluded from a game mode before. Just "Open"? Hmm!

Shadow bans have always been a thing in Elite. Restriction to solo play before the account gets canned completely. Or so I heard.
 
Why though? It's legit gameplay and teaches valuable lessons without harm done.

It required new players to listen to their "slavers" and fit their ship without a fuel scoop (lesson one: never skip on fuel scoops if landing on a carrier)
and most even told to fit 2D frame shifts (lesson two: you never go 2D frame shift, not even in PvP any more).
And the general lesson is, people can be jerks, don't trust randoms on internet. In german we have a saying for this "Gier frisst Hirn" (greed eats your brain).
Nothing except time is lost for the "slaves" here. It was all legit gameplay. No botting, no real money extortion*. Just people playing dumb other people.

And children should learn this lesson, too. The harm done here is comparatively small.

* in case those "slavers" asked for Arx or real word money etc. a ban would definitely be on the table though.

edit



Shadow bans have always been a thing in Elite. Restriction to solo play before the account gets canned completely. Or so I heard.

As you point out, unless the 'slavers' asked for money, ARX, were idiots in ingame chat (i.e. use abusive language) then I don't get it. FD seem to want emergent gameplay but don't like emergent gameplay that is not looking at planets. My guess is that (just like DE) it embarrassed FD enough to warrant slapped wrists.

It would be nice for FD to actually clarify what they see as being 'acceptable' because otherwise its yet another straitjacket. I'd also be interested in knowing if they (FD) took Discord behaviour into account as well, which would be outside the remit I imagine(?)

But in the end its up to them.

It is ironic though that Zemina uses slaves to mine. Will anyone think of the children?
 
Only because FDev has decide it's "abuse". In the end, that's their decision.

If they're banning these people for specific, unprecedented but previously legal gameplay then that's harsh. But if they're banning them for being abusive jerks over comms (for instance) then that's different.
If slaving people to mine is abusive, FD should ban itself, they are the worst slavers, everyone mines and it's all their fault 😂

As said, the whole story is mildly amusing to me. If there were threats, and abusive talk etc, a ban is ok.
The mere extorting of players to work for them is quite fitting for the dystopian setting.
 
I for one support the slavers choice, although I wouldn’t do it myself.... it’s emergent gameplay like this that makes the game fun!
I think it could be funny if it happened to those of us that have been around for a while, (although I doubt we would fall for it) for a brand new player trying to come to grips with the game, not so much.
 
I don't know everything about this case

i think we're all in that boat? i still haven't seen anything but vague rumors. to me it all still seems like a joke.

but is indeed possible that some of this actually happened in some vague form involving a small number of people, got all drummed up and reported and in that case it wouldn't really surprise me that frontier went full kneejerk politically correct gutmensch, that's very much their style.

this game, what a reality show! :ROFLMAO:
 
i think we're all in that boat? i still haven't seen anything but vague rumors. to me it all still seems like a joke.

but is indeed possible that some of this actually happened in some vague form involving a small number of people, got all drummed up and reported and in that case it wouldn't really surprise me that frontier went full kneejerk politically correct gutmensch, that's very much their style.

this game, what a reality show! :ROFLMAO:
insert "are you not entertained?" meme here
 
i think we're all in that boat? i still haven't seen anything but vague rumors. to me it all still seems like a joke.

but is indeed possible that some of this actually happened in some vague form involving a small number of people, got all drummed up and reported and in that case it wouldn't really surprise me that frontier went full kneejerk politically correct gutmensch, that's very much their style.

this game, what a reality show! :ROFLMAO:
3 pages and counting of assumption and guesswork?

Just another day in the Elite forums. :)
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom