Eh, streamers do stuff for views. Do not expect them to be journalists. Actual journalists from the BBC managing to make fluff pieces on SC, multiple times, is far worse.
Mainstream media has been strangely quiet on CIG ever since that Forbes article.
I used to laugh at crowdfunding in general at my office. The head of our IT dept. would occasionally drop a line about SC in particular.
When the Forbes article went to print (I work at a finance firm - granted, it's in content strategy), suddenly everyone took notice. The most positive take was "Short-term gains at the cost of your name and reputation." The worst take was not touching any prospective client who even came close to the crowdfunding model.
Next to Theranos, SC is the example in commercial finance of how
not to do things and provide real value to your audience or returns to investors (and stay in business for future growth).
EDIT: But hey, they signed that 10-year lease, so maybe they've found that unicorn refuge for longevity (or maybe they want to look healthy to future investors as they slowly sell off the company as an exit strategy), who knows?