Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
And Chris said he'd put SQ42 up against any AAA game out there, somewhere around 2014 IIRC.
So it must have been really really good!
Very nice I'm sure...but what the hell has that got to do with Intrepid playing the test builds of TOW?
Never mind all that, how is your missus getting on?Very nice I'm sure...but what the hell has that got to do with Intrepid playing the test builds of TOW?
Doing good mate, a bit more mobile now
Doing good mate, a bit more mobile now
Good fellow, do be sure to let us know when she is well enough to beat seven bells of £$%^ out of you again won't you, you being near 'the edge' always brought something to these boards!
Not to pile up but I agree with Intrepid here.
Doors are hard for every professional.
I know dozens of game industry devs with more than 20 years of experience and there's a general agreement that "F**k doors".
They are hard to make right.
If you're ok with having s***ty doors in your game sure, you can do them fast....
I'll say that maybe doors can cause issues, but there again, so can lots of things.
However, it is in line with CIG's modus operandi to try and make everything sound hard.
However, it is in line with CIG's modus operandi to try and make everything sound hard.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen_refunds/comments/pmcphn/they_see_me_rollin/
Amusing bug. Watch for the NPC at 0:25
Amusing bug. Watch for the NPC at 0:25
“CIG please know there is a huge group of people who love the core aspects of the game as you have it so far…”
On the one hand, i can understand the desire for decent length travel times.. or at least in ED where you have some agency as you travel. Not so sure about SC.
But telling the devs to not do stuff to make the game popular, that's funny. Especially since the game can't run on charity forever. They are going to need a good sized playerbase to keep the lights on at CIG, enough people to keep buying the game, the UEC, and possibly whatever other monetization schemes CIG use post-release.
What..??? Did I miss a CIG’s poll or something? how does this person know that kind of stuff?
edit: maybe this person’s org did a poll about that?
Man, I despise the CIG General forums. Specifically because of threads like this. Every new announcement brings a circlejerk of old backers gatekeeping any opinions about their holy grail game. It's so exhausting.
Just came across this on the GTA sub. Always funny to see someone dumping on SC in the wild.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
Did all of those take 10+ years, 400 millions in funding and still not manage? Heck, let’s put SpaceX guys on the case!
So we're 13 months away from CIG's 10 year anniversary for their kickstarter. How strange is that.
It explains why Squadron 42 is once again the focus, they are looking to release the game on their anniversary or maybe just before that date.
Chris being back on board is certain to help them achieve it.
It explains why Squadron 42 is once again the focus, they are looking to release the game on their anniversary or maybe just before that date.
Chris being back on board is certain to help them achieve it.
I'd totally believe that is their current internal deadline.
Squadron 42 - 10th anniversary edition! (beta)
Well at some point we all become old backers but it wouldn’t be so bad if they at least back their claims with some proof and understand that, unless CIG does a poll and release the results, we can’t
Last edited: