So many river gameplay possibilities.
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
I heard it's somewhat stable when there is only a couple players on it. And they probably cooled it with ice so they could pretend Star Citisnt can be a flawless MP experience. If only they had a clue what "flawless MP experience" means.
You can choose todays soundtrack:
a) Rivers of Babylon
b) special "Autobahn" adaption by me - re-lyricised for rivers.
"Look ! Some assets are out of place in an alpha !"
He doesn't understand what this tech is for, that it's still under heavy development, that water in a flat map <> water with curvature and what it will allow for the game engine in the future : roads
Where we're going we don't need roads...
Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/10ghwa2/my_game_crashed_while_i_was_doing_deliveries_in/
Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/10ghwa2/my_game_crashed_while_i_was_doing_deliveries_in/
Step 1: CIG heavily market the incomplete rivers as looking awesome
Step 2: paytesters give feedback that the incomplete rivers are a bit rubbish
Step 3: devs get stressed with anxiety. Good job, CIG!
Source: https://twitter.com/gillyburd1/status/1616067719350161408
Step 2: paytesters give feedback that the incomplete rivers are a bit rubbish
Step 3: devs get stressed with anxiety. Good job, CIG!
Source: https://twitter.com/gillyburd1/status/1616067719350161408
In other news, the ballistic changes introduced with 3.17.5 are causing a bit of a kerfuffle
robertsspaceindustries.com
robertsspaceindustries.com
Newest PTU patch ballistic changes - Star Citizen Spectrum
At first, Yogi defended the changes to shields and ballistic penetration in 3.18. There was a part about how the VET needed to test these changes with a wider audience, aka, a live patch. Now,...
robertsspaceindustries.com
Where did the ptu-feedback-ballistic-changes thread disappear to? - Star Citizen Spectrum
:joy: CIG, don't worry if you accidentally deleted it. I have a duplicate of it if you need the feedback for your colossal, phenomenal change to shields with a result that no one could have...
robertsspaceindustries.com
That's what you end up with after bungling around for 10 years without a game concept. Devs who have no clue how to design a game.In other news, the ballistic changes introduced with 3.17.5 are causing a bit of a kerfuffle
Newest PTU patch ballistic changes - Star Citizen Spectrum
At first, Yogi defended the changes to shields and ballistic penetration in 3.18. There was a part about how the VET needed to test these changes with a wider audience, aka, a live patch. Now,...Where did the ptu-feedback-ballistic-changes thread disappear to? - Star Citizen Spectrum
:joy: CIG, don't worry if you accidentally deleted it. I have a duplicate of it if you need the feedback for your colossal, phenomenal change to shields with a result that no one could have...
"You just don't understand games development!"
Psalm 42, The Book of JoeBlobbers.
"I'm so glad CIG are taking their time to get things right rather than releasing half finished buggy rubbish like a certain other space sim" - SC backers since 2014.
Quality vs Quantity - Star Citizen Spectrum
I've been playing for years now, going through the loops and enjoying all the content that slowly trickles in. My game crashes frequently and disconnects from the server in comedic times, but this...
robertsspaceindustries.com
CIG: How about neither?
Another thread about the 100+ systems:
Roadmap for next 98 systems? - Star Citizen Spectrum
Hello, We have Stanton, someday we will have pyro but I couldn't find any forecast for the rest. Funding page says Star citizen will launch with 100 systems. So can we take the development time...
robertsspaceindustries.com
Ah, the good old, let's leave up misleading marketing and hope the suckers don't find out the truth before the refund window closes!
But wait, here's a sensible suggestion:
But wait, better to remain deceptive about it!
What a twonk!
It goes on and on...
LOL
And for all the white knights saying about how everything changed when they decided to do full planets:
CIG said they could make proc gen for full planets for just 1 million dollars. They knew they wanted to do full planets in April 2014 and backers provided funding for it.
CIG said they could make proc gen for full planets for just 1 million dollars. They knew they wanted to do full planets in April 2014 and backers provided funding for it.
If this was their philosophy, they wouldn't market anything so they won't have money.
"Sometimes feels like you can’t win. “Why isn’t this out yet?” “It’s not done.” “Release it anyways! Wait why does it look bad!?”"
Err, sorry but I don't think backers are anywhere near having the power on what must come in the next patch/update. I guess it's The Visionary's power. So yeah, you can't neither win nor finish something when "you don't say 'no' to Chris Roberts".
What is "river tech" for? Improving bartenders?
It's to provide locations for the NPC bartenders to go on their holidays when Subsumption AI gets switched on
The interesting thing is the wording. It's for "future iterations" of Star Citizen not the current. Star Citizen V2 - Attention all whales - wallets to the ready let the funding tracker begin again!