Can they license 'StarEngine' [48m]
They both think not on 'package and sell'
Tybio thinks 'if they can make SM work...' they could license as plug in
Tybio thinks biggest challenge = the synchronization between all the microservices
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32ugYk7tqgI&t=3035s
56m15s - Tybio doesn't see them ever getting down to the scale of the SM demo in terms of granular servers etc. Esp for dynamic systems. What rule set would work etc?
59m - Is it worth doing it this way? Tybio doesn't know. (Not enough info)
1h: For Riggle the key issue is reliability vs latency. There are payoffs, where you have to favour one or the other.
(They ponder whether CIG could deal with inter-location latency by having one super localized server farm, as twitter attempted?)
1h3m - Tybio knows companies pulling out of AWS because it's expensive at scale. But those are bigger scales than SC is liable to reach.
1h7m - the 'second server' is what terrifies Tybio re static meshing rollout...
1h8m15s - Riggle v prepared for bugs. Ships blowing up, getting stuck in limbo, ending up where started
1h10m - Tybio hopes to at least be able to log in to have a bad dogfight
1h10m50s - This just (ideally) sorts the server tick rate. It would be the start of fixing current problems, not the actual fix
1h12m30s - Tybio's main optimism based on CIG's happy reaction to the SM demo