Why lol ? With static servers, having 1 or 100 players in a server zone oblige you to launch the server. 3 zones next to each other with 3 players use 3 servers. With dynSM, you can have 3 zones served by a unique server (when 1 player by zone) or 3 zones served by 3 servers (when 100 players by zone)."and reduce infrastructure costs"
Lol
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
100 player for Stanton = 1 server for 100 players
200 players for Stanton+Pyro = 1 server for 100 players
oh LA ...
edit:
Static Meshing
100 players for Stanton = 1 server
100 players for Stanton + Pyro = 2 servers
100 players for Stanton + Pyro + Terra = 3 servers
Dynamic Meshing done right
100 players for Stanton = 1 server
100 players for Stanton + Pyro = 1 servers
100 players for Stanton + Pyro + Terra = 1 servers
edit:
Static Meshing
100 players for Stanton = 1 server
100 players for Stanton + Pyro = 2 servers
100 players for Stanton + Pyro + Terra = 3 servers
Dynamic Meshing done right
100 players for Stanton = 1 server
100 players for Stanton + Pyro = 1 servers
100 players for Stanton + Pyro + Terra = 1 servers
?
Dynamic meshing will be used for small zones (an Idris, missions bunker, a floor of space station, players event, etc). There is no use for dynSM for a whole system.
Oh, so you're saying they will have static server mashing AND dynamic server meshing both at the same time ... interesting - had not considered that ....
Not even for SQ42 :/Are you not hyped?
So, is it the Pyro as it will come to the PU or a Playground-not-Pyro? There was some indigestion on the Spectrum that this new system is very different from the promised Pyro. It is smaller, has more stations and no lava planet.
Starfarer owners had their dreams of refuelling players in Pyro squashed without any word of apology.
If it is 'just like Citcon' then it is not all of Pyro. Soon
No, that would mean with Dynamic Meshing player numbers dilate! Crobbers want it the other way round!
The lava planet was scrapped. I guess they couldn't make it flow...
....
So instancing then.
Edge cases aren't the best point of comparison friend. You can create any scenario you want from those...
Players are merrily documenting the ways in which the F8C is OP 
robertsspaceindustries.com
Spectrum - v6.15.0
RSIās Spectrum is our integrated community and player interaction service, including chat, forums, game integration, and Player Organization facilities. Player Organizations (āOrgā...
robertsspaceindustries.com
Not really.
For exemple, you have a space station with 20 players in and around it. The station is managed by a dyn server which always exist (because there is always players in it).
Arrival of an Idris with 30 pirates players. The Idris use it's own dynamic server that will exist inside the zone of the station server as long as it's stay around it.
Exemple 2: you have a dyn server for a space station that usually manage 50 players in and around the station. A player event is taking place with 100 players, you can split the usual dyn server by 2 servers : one for the outside of station, one for the inside. You can also split the inside of the station with one server for each floor of the station.
You call them edge cases because they can't be handled properly by static servers. There is no need of dynamic meshing if you want to manage your server load in a standard way with hidden loading between physically isolated zones.
The Idris doesnāt exist my dear LittleAnt.
Neither does server meshing in SC.
Neither does server meshing in SC.