ED is dull by design though. It's why it's viewing numbers will never go up unless they are paying famous streamers. It's on level of niche games like kerbal and space engeniers, the hundreds while SC in the thousands. That's how far ahead they are in terms of being "fun", to play and to watch.
The latter is fake. ED had tens of thousands of concurrent players. Proof:
No I can't, but we can see how many average concurrent players Elite Dangerous (basegame or Odyssey alpha) had on Steam at the time (excludes non-Steam platforms).
Therefore the former, being derived from fake, is fake too.
That's not a personal opinion though, it's factual.
Fake. Unless you provide links with statistical research (called 'facts'), this is not factual.
In space games there's the advantage of, well, a lot of space.
SC doesn't have a lot of space being single-system, maybe SC just is not a space game.
SC way of implementing it's features in the game world makes it feel more connected and natural. They all feel part of the same vision. While the ones Frontier keeps bolting and forgetting feel almost as separated mini-games. That doesn't turn ED into bad, it just highlights how much of wasted potential there is in it.
SC way just highlights how much of wasted time spent switching gameplay activities there is in it.
Games can be Released as Alphas and be monetized, judged and reviewed as such in these modern times.
The last one is fake. If you visit
de-facto industry standard site for game reviews, you will see that SC can not be reviewed.
Also, almost forgot, we could only wish that Frontier would care enough to present us with a roadmap or list of things they are working on. Even if plans changed along the way, it would be better than being treated as mushrooms.
Complete phrase for mushrooms is "Being kept in the dark and fed cowpiss". I see SC fanboys don't see a problem with the latter.
For me, If a company clearly states it's game is in alpha stage, sells it's game as an alpha, has free-flys of it as an alpha. It's not hiding behind it now is it?
Fake, fake, fake, fake.
First, CIG does'bt state ALPHA clearly, it's just a small-font margin note.
Second, Genuine Roberts himself had stated that CIG treats SC as released game. Your words are nothing against his in this case.
Third, free-plays has nthing ro do with being ALPHA, there are lots of complete games that have those on regular basis, for example:
Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint will soon be free to play with Operation Motherland. Ubisoft announces that Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint will be free to play for the weekend of November 4-7 to mark Ubisoft’s 35th anniversary. The offer will be available on Xbox Series X | S, Xbox One...
www.aroged.com
In case you missed it, we’ve had a lot of updates and news for Gears 5 – Free Play Days, Batista, and Operation 3 Gridiron. Let’s jump in! Welcome to Gears 5 – Operation 3: Gridiron! Get in on this single life objective mode with two teams fighting to run a neutral flag into their […]
news.xbox.com
Join over 22 million players and begin your story for FREE in The Elder Scrolls Online.
www.elderscrollsonline.com
Fourth, CIG is exactly hiding behind ALPHA. This excuse is used solely to discard any negative opinion or conclusion about SC.
Hiding behind it would be putting it in the stores as a released product without disclosing that it was in fact still in Alpha.
Fake. Not disclosing it at all would be a fraud, not 'hiding behind'.
You doubt the trustfulness of steam numbers. Why? So you can make up you own bogus ones more easily?
He discards the facts that break his agenda because he has no other arguments, but has to push his agenda anyway. I wonder why? Trolling? Shilling? Derek Smart?
When a company advertises a game as "playable now", what is that? Wilful misrepresentation? Scam?
That's false advertisement. But sure, let SC fanboys put the blame on the buyers that were misled. I heard
blaming the victim is really a thing.
CR said the release will be when SM stable enough and around 10 systems done.
So, never.