Maybe.
And maybe the problem is with the very issue of how following any ideology impacts the way human brain is working.
Because what I have learned by several cases of "clashes" with very differently biased people,
is that one side is using some statistical correlations in manipulative and mathematically wrong way,
like applying some conclusions that are correct statistically to legitimize prejudices toward specific people,
and others were denying statistical data that is not fitting the axioms of their ideology,
although this data allowed to correctly predict how changes in social structure will translate to the changes of distribution of some other features/perks in a very large groups of people (because this is where and how you properly use statistics).
And I just happen to like and "feel" statistics and, it was my favorite part of higher math when I was at the university.
But you are right after all, problem was in me, because I was focused on math instead of "the higher goal" of ideology/people I was arguing with .
And the common ground that is partially OUTSIDE of their ideological agenda is per definition not possible.
OK, EOT.
Last edited:
Nice chap if you meet him off duty.