NO .. but I would like to pay again 100 € if they make an Real LAN/Offline Mode where we get back Newtoinian Flight and Time Accelerating, with out this Intances Loading after FSD....
Almost no console game that supports more than 4 players uses peer to peer architecture.
Every single one that does has cheaters, lag, and overall highly dissatisfied players.
I refuse to believe this. Are you saying that every single console game that has P2P and more than 4 players has cheaters, lag and highly dissatisfied players? Your entire statement screams hyperbole.
Totally support paying if it meant a better multiplayer experience, i.e. along the lines of WOW and ESO. Not the same as them ofc but the complete lack of hassle in comparison to what I am worried this might turn out to be would imho be well worth the extra cash.
Also it gives the developer a very good reason to keep everyone happy now and in the future.
People who have never payed for an mmorpg before and are against paying for play on a regular basis in principal should think about the benifits.
Total conjecture ofc as FD might sort it properly but I am a firm believer there is no such thing as a free lunch and you get what you pay for
Totally support paying if it meant a better multiplayer experience, i.e. along the lines of WOW and ESO. Not the same as them ofc but the complete lack of hassle in comparison to what I am worried this might turn out to be would imho be well worth the extra cash.
Also it gives the developer a very good reason to keep everyone happy now and in the future.
People who have never payed for an mmorpg before and are against paying for play on a regular basis in principal should think about the benifits.
Totally support paying if it meant a better multiplayer experience, i.e. along the lines of WOW and ESO. Not the same as them ofc but the complete lack of hassle in comparison to what I am worried this might turn out to be would imho be well worth the extra cash.
Also it gives the developer a very good reason to keep everyone happy now and in the future.
People who have never payed for an mmorpg before and are against paying for play on a regular basis in principal should think about the benifits.
Total conjecture ofc as FD might sort it properly but I am a firm believer there is no such thing as a free lunch and you get what you pay for
People who have never payed for an mmorpg before and are against paying for play on a regular basis in principal should think about the benifits.
Total conjecture ofc as FD might sort it properly but I am a firm believer there is no such thing as a free lunch and you get what you pay for
who is expecting a free lunch? my "lunch" as you call it was £110!, which is a lot more than any other gaming meal I have played, inc ones with large MP components!.
And before you say that I paid for the privilege of the premium beta... No i didnt, I would never PAY to get into a beta. I paid that because I wanted to support the project to be as good as it can be, and that amount was the max I was happy to pay.... The beta was just a nice addition![]()
"A better multiplayer experience" in what sense? No lag / rubberbanding or more WoW-like / ESO-like with guilds / loot / raids / etc?
Turned around, this infers that the playerbase would have a means to try to exert control over Frontier's game (e.g. by threatening to stop paying subs if feature X is not implemented).
.... at the same time as the pitfalls.