Is that even an argument? What are we discussing here? How does that relate to FD failing one more time to deliver, to the disingenuous attitude towards it, and the contrast between the way they talk about the orrery map now with the way they talked about it four years ago. Instead, you derail the arguments towards minor points, or secondary mistakes, instead of addressing the core of the opposing views. And to what point? It seems to me that it is to invalidate only, without even trying to discuss something of substance.... "facepalm".So, if FD make an orrey map, will you start to play the game?