The internet is full of rabid jerks.
it is, but if you are complaining about some behavior you dislike on this forum and then go on with that expression you are implicitly painting anyone coarsely fitting that definition (who decides?) in those terms. which is the old straw in the other's eye, and also a generalization dividing people by their opinions and expression, which in turn promotes polarization, which kills discussion. disliking some opinion or the way it is put forward doesn't automatically mean it is actually bad or wrong, and much less that the author is a jerk. nobody is a complete rabid jerk, and nobody is a saint either, so it's best to leave all those subjective judgmements about people outside, and i would be specially wary about group designations. they are toxic and detrimental not to actually anyone in those imaginary groups, but the whole community. i find troy_mclure's argument has a point, not aimed at you personally but at the inconsistency in the opinion you put forward, related to yet another common phenomenon around here: valid criticism being derided and derailed by polite swarms. we can all learn something. even ... 'you saints who never never ever said the f-word, and have a monomolecular layer of skin'. see what i did there?
Nobody specifically.
throwing the stone and hiding the hand behind the back? tsk!