Ghost factions for people that might not know are player minor factions (PMF) that are no longer receiving support from the players that requested it. They are a frustration for other player groups because a PMF cannot be requested in a system that has another PMF present (home system or otherwise). I don't have figures of how many ghost factions actually exist but I'm sure people have examples on hand in their chosen area. The even more frustrating part is that some of these aren't just player groups that expanded for a bit and then got bored, some were actually born as orphans. The process is so painfully slow and with next to no contact from Frontier that once player groups submit a PMF request, some collapse before it is even introduced. Eventually all the decent systems will be taken up and players will be picking from scraps.
I know that when I submitted our groups request I had to give my email as a contact. That means our PMF is linked to me and at any point Frontier can ask me if I still want it. This could easily be done as an automatic process that sends me an email once a month or so, I click a button to acknowledge it and if I don't then the PMF is submitted for review. If that system is requested by a different group while mine is on the 'potentially inactive' list then it should be replaced.
I realise this brings in an ugly element of player politics (disgruntled ousted leaders or inactive leaders) but then these people should have taken the responsibility to hand over control to another player by updating the contact details with Frontier. If a PMF is owned by only one player that is away for some reason then, oh well you shouldn't have had a PMF in the first place (again, I know of a few PMFs that obviously lied about membership numbers when submitting their request).
So what do people think. Is it fair that ghost factions or single players hold onto territory that could be used by actual active groups of players?
I know the sodium content is high in this subject but I do look forward to what others in this community think?
I know that when I submitted our groups request I had to give my email as a contact. That means our PMF is linked to me and at any point Frontier can ask me if I still want it. This could easily be done as an automatic process that sends me an email once a month or so, I click a button to acknowledge it and if I don't then the PMF is submitted for review. If that system is requested by a different group while mine is on the 'potentially inactive' list then it should be replaced.
I realise this brings in an ugly element of player politics (disgruntled ousted leaders or inactive leaders) but then these people should have taken the responsibility to hand over control to another player by updating the contact details with Frontier. If a PMF is owned by only one player that is away for some reason then, oh well you shouldn't have had a PMF in the first place (again, I know of a few PMFs that obviously lied about membership numbers when submitting their request).
So what do people think. Is it fair that ghost factions or single players hold onto territory that could be used by actual active groups of players?
I know the sodium content is high in this subject but I do look forward to what others in this community think?