Modes The Solo vs Open vs Groups Thread - Mk III

Do you want a Open PvE

  • Yes, I want a Open PvE

    Votes: 54 51.4%
  • No, I don't want a Open PvE

    Votes: 49 46.7%
  • I want only Open PvE and PvP only in groups

    Votes: 2 1.9%

  • Total voters
    105
  • Poll closed .
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
I believe many people would relish the competitive nature of it - from the existing player population and it would definitely attract new customers from competitive games such as Eve, Planetside 2 etc.

That's the crux of it - Elite isn't competetive. It's a play-as-you-like-when-you-like game. If there was ever any competition in Elite - it was the Reach Triple Elite goal for cash which ended ages ago. The game's already been won. Game over man, game over.
 
That is true.

I realise the status quo. Unfortunately I believe the connected modes is a bane to some existing customers and future customers.

I think if FD relented they would see an uptick in player retention and new customers.

There is a large market of competitive players FD could appeal to.it

I am one of them and have friends that wait for this gamestyle brought to Elite.

I will continue to campaign for it.

Nah...people like it or hate it.

Polarization is good for a game. Keeps out the riff raff!

Accept the game for what it is and play until your arms fall off....or you get bored. Either the game continues without you....or many more come to agree with your stance and the game dies.

This is the choice of the devs and is exactly how the game, and its rules, works. They are not changing it....just repeated less than two weeks ago.

BTW...there is plenty of competition. Just because you can't shoot someone, it doesn't mean they aren't out competing you!
 
There is no reason for it and a waste of resources, not to mention NOT how FD wants the game to be. THEY want everyone to effect the BGS, which you want to negate with your "open only" mode.

I believe there is a significant audience for it.

And as many failed business owners will testify, your belief doesn't constitute proof a viable market.

Look Mouse hit the nail on the head. FD is the ultimate arbiter of what shall and shall not be a part of the game. I agree with FD's position on this that all Modes are viable, and should contribute. Fundamentally, having multiple modes doesn't really impact the outcome because of FD's power. They create the CGs, they write the rules, and if they disagree with the outcome they have the power to change it. Their position from day one as I understand it has not been to step back and simply let players run the galaxy.
 
I believe many people would relish the competitive nature of it - from the existing player population and it would definitely attract new customers from competitive games such as Eve, Planetside 2 etc.


I'm not convinced that the BSG holds that much interest for the competitive types. Not enough to attract a large crowd anyway, more likely just a segment of those in open now. You really don't see much call for that here in this thread. What you see are calls for incentives, locks, and penalties. The talk about PP is more of a smoke screen for gaining a larger audience to open. Just what benefit do you suspect would draw players in?
 
He's blatantly ignored this over and over and over again


His intention is to make an argument for change. In this debate what FD has decided, is exactly what we're discussing. Let's discuss the merits of the points made, not just keep reminding people what the status quo is.
 
I believe many people would relish the competitive nature of it - from the existing player population and it would definitely attract new customers from competitive games such as Eve, Planetside 2 etc.


The game is extremely competitive now. Well, at least on the collect your PvE trophies to make levers fall and buttons push. It's just not worth killing others in PvP over.

I guess your gonna love the CQC right? Your very own separate PvP place to fight over, right? With no interference from 'those other modes', right?

Yeah...wanting your cake and eating it, too. Not going to happen!
 
Persistence. Fights in Power play, CGs etc that have results due to direct actions. It would make the game more visceral and immersive which would attract players. It would solve Powerplay's grindy problems at least for Open Only.

How. Just because you split the BSG, won't make it work differently. You'll still have to wait for all of the beans to be counted.
 
Eve has proven there is a paying market for it.

To use English a bit more rigorously for a moment.

Eve is proof there is a market.

Eve's market doesn't mean there are any more dollars to get beyond Eve, or that amount of money is capable of funding FD's opoerations, or that FD can get the money Eve is currently receiving. In short the market you can currently see may be saturated and subject to constraints which render it unviable for entry.

If you really think money's there start your own game and try to reap the rewards.
 
Last edited:
His intention is to make an argument for change. In this debate what FD has decided, is exactly what we're discussing. Let's discuss the merits of the points made, not just keep reminding people what the status quo is.


Why bother? We all agree the modes suck. However, they are not changing, no matter the desire of the masses. This is the experiment the game is based on. We all have to live with it.

I have to go and move some 'tea' around so that we can cure that germ....so that we can move something else around...so we make more credits!
 
This is why the thead exists. People post in it that think the status quo should be changed. I am posting in the right place. Whether FD ever listen I don't know but I think it's worth reminding them that some would find more reason to play the game with these changes.


actually this thread exists because people buy the game without researching it or they decide they want a different game and make threads so they got shunted into one thread. Changing the game slightly to fix something, good. Completely changing the game mechanics to appease a small minority of people, not going to happen.

- - - Updated - - -

I have no intention to start my own game (and nor do I have the skills). I do find anecdotally that players would enjoy an Open only mode to Elite. I think it's worth FD giving it a go. I am providing feedback to FD that there is an audience for this. Other players in the thread(s) have and continue to do the same.


you find that few players would enjoy,
 
You would know all results are due to your modes actions. Instance issues would occur but we would accept the matchmaking system did its best.


I just don't see the demand. Not here in this thread anyway. My impression is that the BSG is used as a smokescreen for the effort to gain a larger population in open.

I, also, suggest that there isn't enough players in open, now, to support its own BSG, let alone a segment of open players who would opt in to your idea.
 
I believe there is a significant audience for it.

to paraphrase Friedrich Nietzsche
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that belief does not prove anything.

i believe that ironman mode is currently available in the game as it stands with no additional code.

it's voluntary.

"PROVE YOUR HONOR play the iron man way"
create a new character after each death.

it's voluntary.
it even lets cheaters "play the way they want to play".

it's so simple even i could think of it.


i believe that the three modes are here to stay, and rightfully so.
oohhhh perhaps the "OPEN-PVE" may be added, but that's for another thread.
 
Last edited:
Not an answer for you. Fortunately you are not the gatekeeper for FD however much you would like to believe you are.


No one is saying they are the "gatekeeper" for FD.. nor does anyone believe we are no matter how much you want to insinuate. IF you want to play Eve go play it, but please quit trying to drastically alter Elite Dangerous to pander to a few who want a certain way of play.
 
Again, sadly, you have a a small contingent of players who feel they are more important than everyone else and they want to drastically disrupt the game to fit their play style. I know it has be suggested to add it as a 5th mode (after ironman) yet they can't justify the expenditure and allocation of resources.
 
This is why the thead exists. People post in it that think the status quo should be changed. I am posting in the right place. Whether FD ever listen I don't know but I think it's worth reminding them that some would find more reason to play the game with these changes.
Quite right. And this is why the thread grew so big: there are plenty of players who disagree with you and think the status quo should not change. If this thread only had been echoing your opinion, you wouldn't have 3 megathreads. That requires differing opinions.

And while you imply that FD doesn't listen to it's players and change the status quo, the delicious irony is that you completely overlook the people you're arguing with. Who are also players. Who have just as much reason to be heard and taken notice of as you.

Don't act as if keeping the status quo means FD doesn't listen. It means FD has heard your arguments, and have found them wanting.
Eve has proven there is a paying market for it.
And Elite has proven there is a paying market for their model. So, your point is ...?
 
Last edited:

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
Again, sadly, you have a a small contingent of players who feel they are more important than everyone else and they want to drastically disrupt the game to fit their play style. I know it has be suggested to add it as a 5th mode (after ironman) yet they can't justify the expenditure and allocation of resources.

.... and after an Open-PvE mode for those who like meeting up with random people but want to avoid PKers, surely?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom