atak2
A
You're on duty too? All hands on deck!
Modes The Solo vs Open vs Groups Thread - Part the Second [Now With Added Platforms].
- Thread starter Robert Maynard
- Start date
- Status
You're on duty too? All hands on deck!
You know what else doesn't help the community - calling them cowards.
But you keep doing it anyway.
Last edited:
Yet you are the one calling others cowards.. in a game..
Shield cells, missiles, python. Should I continue?
Last edited:
atak2
A
Nope. I implied players that won't move their valuable ships to open from solo because of risk have problems based on the google definition.
Players that enjoy solo and stay in solo I have no issue with what-so-ever.
+rep This is exactly what those "open only" players dance around until a slip like "I wud keelz you in Open cmon come at me" happens.
doods: I am not your content.
atak2
A
Exactly. It's a game. No need for tumbler trigger warnings...
he said games not litle modules ships lol
Last edited:
atak2
A
Good for you. I truly mean that. Enjoy solo/group.
Balance tweaks are not "game changing"
Well, not unless you are abusing a broken mechanic, then a balance pass may be "game changing".
Yet you have no right to judge where people play with their ships. People are allowed to go between Solo and Open, and are allowed to use what ship they want. Who made you the god of the universe to dictate that if you play in this arena you have to play this way with this ship? No one.
And since you like to use definitions..
imply
1. to indicate or suggest without being explicitly stated
2. to signify or mean.
SO pretty much your response is that you didn't call people cowards, you just suggested and meant that they were.. in a computer game.. and because they don't play the way you do.
What major, base function, design level changes have occurred due to developers being influenced by the forums?
No one on this forum has the ability to do this. The only influence anyone of us MIGHT have on this issue is in the Vox Populi thread, read the first post to understand the scope (https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=130872&p=2003663&viewfull=1#post2003663)...this is where the devs are monitoring people opinions on the equivalency between the modes. You can use the 'report this post' link, copy, or type your opinion in the moderator report area, asking them to place your opinion in the above thread and they will...you only get one entry....so think and write carefully.
Beyond this, this thread is actually just a bunch of people fighting EVERY opinion that states differently, because they do not trust the devs to not 'cave in to the whiners'.
Which technically speaking, IS removing it. You're in essence and actuality removing solo play mode from the game as it was advertised and designed. How about this: Gather all the people that crave/like PvP and form a group much like Mobius and go shoot each other to your heart's content.
Why is that not an option? Why is it so distasteful? It's a perfectly legitimate solution to the "dilemma", and it utilizes the game AS IT IS NOW. No changes necessary.
Non-existent griefers? You can't be that ignorant. All of us can read the forums. Many of us have seen the goonswarm in action here. You don't know about the Suicidwinders ramming everyone at starting stations for laughs? You don't know anything about the blockades and embargos around the Lave-Leesti clusters? Etc etc.
Argue all you want but please, don't dissemble on stuff that's easily fact-checked by reading the forums.
atak2
A
From your definition I indicated and suggested. Completely viable based on other players feedback on how they choose to play the game.
and you went after Jockey for what you thought was cherry picking.. do as I say not as I do hmmm?
But... I though Open players were complaining about people who have played Solo to get that big ship only to come into Open with it. I get dizzy sometimes.
removing the 10% module loss, or changing that you compete with others in powerplay, although I doubt you'll count those.
Last edited:
- Status