The Star Citizen Thread v8

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Gamescom 2017 Erin Roberts interview: https://youtu.be/n-ToRKZkJdI?t=39m30s

Partially-cleaned-up Youtube Transcript (it's an audible mess of jumbled words):

DJKnight: "will there be a way in 3.0 for a player to rent a ship that they don't have access to so they can kind of give it a test run for it?"

Erin: "well you'll be able to buy it, they're using, you know, after you get in 3.0 yeah, that's the idea. It's basically, the idea is about something, kind of different things go bad, so that's, obviously, that's the hope. The whole idea is if you've obviously been good enough to support the game and obviously own a package, and some of that and you have the ship to fly, but also the idea is we're gonna be earning, as we go in we're gonna be earning money so you can buy items and ships, you can do stuff like that. And also I have to say no to 3.0 because actually, we actually think that's probably not be making 3.0 but 3.1. But the idea is everything else you can buy and you can do all that kind of stuff"

DJKnight: "So maybe not the first major update but further down the line"

DiscoLando: "i just want to reconfirm that is ship purchasing with alpha UEC, it's down the road, it's still in the pipeline"


There may have also been a media article or two on the topic, which CIG won't have corrected, so definitely worth looking out for.
 
https://youtu.be/MI-D-o08zgE

Montoya the YouTuber. What's not to like?

I think it's hilarious. Each of the counterarguments is lame. Even the point that I agree with, that new ships don't affect the development time, is put so lamely I can poke holes through it.

My favourite counterargument is to "funding will dry up when people get tired of being milked". I almost spat out my whisky.

"Look at this chart which shows that we've had lots of money roll in. The fact that the money kept rolling in even when we thought it was already a ridiculous amount means that the money will always keep rolling in for ever and ever. And the bubble will never ever burst."

I don't know who this guy is but he should sell Bitcoins.
 

Viajero

Volunteer Moderator
Yeah, also I guess I must agree with him that SC is absolutely not a scam in the same way that Enron or Theranos were never a scam either.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, also I guess I must agree with him that SC is absolutely not a scam in the same way that Enron or Theranos were never a scam either.

"Of course there was nothing sleazy going on there. How could there be anything sleazy happening when Chris Roberts started up so many different companies?"
 
It's true that Dr Smart isn't always right, it's also true that he's consistently more right than CIG are. So pointing it out is always a bit of a pyrrhic victory.

Thats assuming you have to pick either one. I think most people just consider both sides petty lying losers, and chose neither. "but the other dude is a bigger liar!" is a really feeble defense. :p
 
It's true that Dr Smart isn't always right, it's also true that he's consistently more right than CIG are. So pointing it out is always a bit of a pyrrhic victory.

Ah Stigbob, my friend, you got it wrong - again. This time sleutelbos got it right. :p

(i'm sorry, I just had to do this!)
 
Thats assuming you have to pick either one. I think most people just consider both sides petty lying losers, and chose neither. "but the other dude is a bigger liar!" is a really feeble defense. :p

But in the grand scheme of things regarding the lawsuit and the state of the game and projected progress it only matters if one side is lying - and the one that matters isn't the warlord!!
 
Thats assuming you have to pick either one. I think most people just consider both sides petty lying losers, and chose neither. "but the other dude is a bigger liar!" is a really feeble defense. :p

I don't think you understand what a pyrrhic victory is, the whole point is that there are no winners.
 
I don't think you understand what a pyrrhic victory is, the whole point is that there are no winners.

No, we understand perfectly well what words mean, thank you very much. :rolleyes: We're just trying to explain to you that pointing out that DS is an attention-seeking lying drama-queen is not a 'pyrrhic victory' because we can easily say that without trying to 'make CIG win'. There clearly are winners here: the people who dont feel the need to champion either of these two epic losers. :)
 
No, we understand perfectly well what words mean, thank you very much. :rolleyes: We're just trying to explain to you that pointing out that DS is an attention-seeking lying drama-queen is not a 'pyrrhic victory' because we can easily say that without trying to 'make CIG win'. There clearly are winners here: the people who dont feel the need to champion either of these two epic losers. :)

You can't stand Dr Smart, you go out of your way to vilify him at every opportunity the very last thing you can ever claim is that you are impartial.
 
You can't stand Dr Smart, you go out of your way to vilify him at every opportunity the very last thing you can ever claim is that you are impartial.

Whatever you want man. [haha] You just keep STANDING BY for the BREAKING NEWS!!!!!
 
Last edited:
It's true that Dr Smart isn't always right, it's also true that he's consistently more right than CIG are. So pointing it out is always a bit of a pyrrhic victory.

Dude, how many times has he claimed the ELE is just around the corner?

Edit: When did this become the DS thread?
 
Last edited:
Whatever you want man. [haha] You just keep STANDING BY for the BREAKING NEWS!!!!!

I get that you see this in extremes of black and white which is why you follow me round dangerous discussion commenting that I comment on star citizen far more often than I actually comment on star citizen anymore, but I don't actually follow Dr Smart on twitter or anywhere else. I've never had to, there are plenty of people keeping everyone fully informed of everything he ever says.
 
You can't stand Dr Smart, you go out of your way to vilify him at every opportunity the very last thing you can ever claim is that you are impartial.

I really don't get people's problems with him, unless they are SC shill. Yeah he has a tendency to oversell his breaking news, and his blog postings do tend to be a bit rambling, but compared to his posting on USENET back in the 90s, he's pretty chilled nowadays and enjoys a good banter.

To be honest, I would rather buy into his game which he has mostly self-funded than the P2W monstrosity that is CRobbers' magnum opus.
 
Dude, how many times has he claimed the ELE is just around the corner?

I get the impression most of the time it's a running joke he trolls his admirers with, exactly the same as "two weeks". He only does it because it works every single time without fail. Just because the people getting mad at him have no sense of humor at all doesn't mean he hasn't got one.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom