Yup - but just look at that RAM load. As for your bandwidth useage - if playing SC is the only thing you've got going on - they have serious issues.
I just did a quick test on the closest rig.

Last edited:
Yup - but just look at that RAM load. As for your bandwidth useage - if playing SC is the only thing you've got going on - they have serious issues.
I just did a quick test on the closest rig.
Since people worry about money so much.
More like why are you worried what anyone else thinks about whether or not you buy a chariot? Do it or don't. No one cares except Chris Roberts (and anyone else who is personally invested in the success of the game).
But this is probably the wrong place to offer up the admission that you were thinking about buying one, if you hoped for a supportive virtual group hug and people assuring you that you'll be respected and envied if you do.
Why not go full Legatus? As long as you put in 80k hours it's the exact same value for money. Think of all those ships you could be walking around. When they're all finished.
oh I’m sorry I didn’t bash the game. Pathetic.
If I understand the latest RtV correctly - they are going to finish Stanton sometime well before they consider adding jump points. There will be no jump points this year. Maybe not in 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 - as so many things depend on the Vision and the teams velocity.
So I cannot come to an online forum, labeled Star Citizen and ask about a ship?
oh I’m sorry I didn’t bash the game. Pathetic.
They aren't even scheduled to finish Stanton this year. September is Hurston, December is Arccrop. That leaves Microtech, the ice planet. And no, no jump point planed for this year. Or planned at all on the road map.
That said, if Hurston is in with its four moons, that is a huge play area.
Going off CIGs track record though with sticking to their plans, there is a big IF in all of that.
I think your comment highlights one of the main differences between ED and SC though. In SC the focus is on legs, while in ED its on the ships. In ED a planet and a few moons adds nothing to the play area, its insignificant. In SC, the addition of a planet and a few moons is major in terms of play area.
Partially because a new planet and moons would double or more than double the existing play area, but also from the legs perspective its massive.
Still, the addition of play area means little if it doesn't add anything else to do in those areas. One of the criticisms against ED is that its all the same no matter where you go, same applies to SC here unless there is some unique content.
That was with a 720p twitch stream running in chrome.
This is what it looked like in the same place (in a ship floating around Olisar) with chrome shut down and no video streaming:
https://i.imgur.com/SuImagf.png
And out of curiosity, this is what my system looks like playing elite, just sitting in a station at the CG in open....
https://i.imgur.com/MMlN1vP.png
Still, the addition of play area means little if it doesn't add anything else to do in those areas. One of the criticisms against ED is that its all the same no matter where you go, same applies to SC here unless there is some unique content.
100% agree, but at least this year, they have been doing 1/2 decent.
Am I right in thinking that the FOIP webcam stuff was going to do full headtracking, gimbal aiming etc?
100% agree, but at least this year, they have been doing 1/2 decent.
at this risk of getting busted for going off topic again....
i played ED first for hours and hours. and i never thought "space legs" where worth doing. after playing SC, i love space legs. the only way i can think to put it perspective is to compare it to GTA. would GTA be anywhere near as much fun if you, as a player, where stuck in a car, motorcycle, or plane and couldnt run around.