The Star Citizen Thread v9

Apparently so.

Chris's pitchfork meltdown says 6 figures for the 2 film crews, the rental alone is supposed to be a quarter million.

I have no idea, maybe the clergy ought to ask Chris how much this is costing them, seeing as half of reddit/games is laughing at them right now

If this is true, if these figures are accurate, CIG shouldn't be hosting a con of any kind.
 
What the!? They received money to make a game, why did they have to go with that kind of event in g first place! Next : it's backers' fault, that's what you mean?

No, my point is simply that CIG would get criticism no matter what they did.

If this is true, if these figures are accurate, CIG shouldn't be hosting a con of any kind.

Makes me wonder though, WHY do they suddenly want to spend MORE money than before? They better have some damn awesome announcement to back that up.
 
Makes me wonder though, WHY do they suddenly want to spend MORE money than before? They better have some damn awesome announcement to back that up.
Unlikely. I suspect the real reason is that Chris's ego finds it hard to accept the ridicule that he's gotten due to the technical issues that have plagued previous events, and he wants to make sure this one is slick and professional. The biggest costs are likely to be the external company that he's employing to provide the coverage, which *should* ensure things go well (assuming he doesn't try to micromanage it himself, good luck with that).
 
No, my point is simply that CIG would get criticism no matter what they did.



Makes me wonder though, WHY do they suddenly want to spend MORE money than before? They better have some damn awesome announcement to back that up.

Because they want the hype back. Look at cyberpunk, dead cells, whatever the new Skyrim is.

SC is nowhere.

But blizzard are good and have big cons!
If SC have big cons they'll be big like Blizzard!

Cargo Cult game development. Now I've seen everything.
 
No, my point is simply that CIG would get criticism no matter what they did.



Makes me wonder though, WHY do they suddenly want to spend MORE money than before? They better have some damn awesome announcement to back that up.


Who exactly would criticize them for not charging for streaming?
 
Who exactly would criticize them for not charging for streaming?

Anyone who thinks they waste backer money on an event instead of putting them into the game

Because let's face it, one way or the other there is a cost for that event.

- Some backers will complain if the event is removed
- Some will complain they waste money that could go to the game
- Some will complain that they are greedy who demand payment for it (even though there will be no money taken from the game development)
 
btw here are Ships sales from last Citcon:
2017-10-26 $457,046 $162 million passed at 20:57 UTC+1 Consolidated Outland Pioneer presales started
2017-10-27 $896,567 Citizencon 2017 Consolidated Outland Pioneer regular sale started
2017-10-28 $401,025 $163 million passed at 10:06 UTC+1
2017-10-29 $133,814
2017-10-30 $110,397

so they need extra 20 $ to cover some extra expenses this year...lol
 
Unlikely. I suspect the real reason is that Chris's ego finds it hard to accept the ridicule that he's gotten due to the technical issues that have plagued previous events, and he wants to make sure this one is slick and professional. The biggest costs are likely to be the external company that he's employing to provide the coverage, which *should* ensure things go well (assuming he doesn't try to micromanage it himself, good luck with that).

Just one small problem with this.... they still have to show the game, which should provide plenty of lulz moments, unless of course, all they show is pre-rendered stuff and not actual live gameplay. Or, forget it, they can just show off some adverts for new concept ships.

Bend over backers! Open your wallets!
 
Anyone who thinks they waste backer money on an event instead of putting them into the game
They could very easily squash that argument though by showing how ticket sales + subscriber funds >= cost of convention. Of course, if that equation *doesn't* hold then yeah, they'd deserve all the vitriol they get because all pledges are supposed to go toward development.

What's really bizarre here is that Chris is saying that they have 2x the budget but 3x the attendees, and ticket prices have increased. That means they're bringing in *much* more this year from ticket sales relative to the cost of the convention, so either last year the equation didn't hold (oops!) or this year subscriber funds are too low to be a contributory factor. Either way the community ought to be asking some tough questions here.
 
Anyone who thinks they waste backer money on an event instead of putting them into the game

Because let's face it, one way or the other there is a cost for that event.

- Some backers will complain if the event is removed
- Some will complain they waste money that could go to the game
- Some will complain that they are greedy who demand payment for it (even though there will be no money taken from the game development)

I don't remember anyone complaining about all the other streams being free to watch. Let's face it, CIG should have paid people to watch them. :p
 
Just one small problem with this.... they still have to show the game, which should provide plenty of lulz moments, unless of course, all they show is pre-rendered stuff and not actual live gameplay. Or, forget it, they can just show off some adverts for new concept ships.
If they've learnt anything it'll be pre-rendered and they won't attempt to do any of those cringeworthy "live" walkthroughs. They'd take a bit of flak for it, but we've seen from the Cyberpunk footage (which appeared to be on rails) that as long as it's well-presented and shows actual, innovative gameplay - and not just mocap cutscenes - it can still be well-received.
 
Must be exhausting trying to defend CIG considering their regular gaffes and money grubbing.

Why bother doing it, it's not like anything half decent will come of it, they missed that boat a long time ago.
 
So Chris has come down from the mountain to let us know he's decided to "take a leaf out of Blizzard's book" has he?... but hey, waiddaminute, aren't Blizzard/Activision one of those big bad publishers Chris was saving PC gaming from?

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
 
Must be exhausting trying to defend CIG considering their regular gaffes and money grubbing.

Why bother doing it, it's not like anything half decent will come of it, they missed that boat a long time ago.

Because by all means the Vision must succeed. I for one would throw my kids under a train if it helps the BDSSE. I'm a Sturm Citzen! I'm doing my part! Praise and bow for Chris Almighty!
 
Back
Top Bottom