You set yourself up for it being pointed out to you by arguing the "valet service" claim. It is not "patronising" to point out the flaw in your own argument.If either of you had read the thread you would see that I had already pointed that out myself, so there is no need to keep trying to patronize me.
Given the nature of the transfer logic, I think it is a flawed assumption to even propose it is anything like a "valet service".