Universal Cartographics Galactic Record Breakers

Patau82 · Feb 2, 2015

ADDED LATEST RECORDS!

HERE'S ONE FROM ME:

SMALLEST GAS GIANT WITH WATER-BASED LIFE
HIP 23935 6 WITH A RADIUS OF 15,094 KM

here a pic of her looking back

also saw these binary planets in the same system

MonkeyD said:
Haha I wondered who CMDR Monkey D Luffy is, guess i got him

lol found me!

hozzdutch · Feb 2, 2015

I've just visited HIP 63835. 14 stellar bodies and 3 black holes. I've not been to a system yet with more than 4 stars so I thought this was impressive

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST BARYCENTRIC STELLAR BODIES - HIP 63835 - 9 STELLAR BODIES IN BARYCENTRIC ORBITS

After seeing the above record, wouldn't it make sense to add another couple of records to the list (and to try and stick with your current formats...
SYSTEM WITH THE MOST BARYCENTRIC BODIES (NON GAS GIANT)
and
SYSTEM WITH THE MOST BARYCENTRIC GAS GIANTS

If you add these then I'll start off one with this -
SYSTEM WITH THE MOST BARYCENTRIC BODIES (NON GAS GIANT) - HIP 63835 - 3 NON GAS GIANT BODIES IN BARYCENTRIC ORBITS

A TYPE STAR WITH THE DEEPEST NESTING - HIP 63835 ABCD 9 - 2ND TIER (i think)

K TYPE STAR WITH THE DEEPEST NESTING - HIP 63835 ABCD 3 - 2ND TIER

SMALLEST T-TYPE - HIP 63835 ABCD 10 A - SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.1130
T-TYPE WITH THE DEEPEST NESTING - HIP 63835 ABCD 10 A - 3RD TIER

FURTHEST TERRAFORMABLE PLANET FROM SOL - HIP 63835 CD 3 - 275.46LY

hozzdutch · Feb 2, 2015

Largest rocky ice planet - wregoe xc-z c27-10 4 - radius of 11,393km

Ender · Feb 2, 2015

These 2 lines from my post have somehow been missed:
LIGHTEST WHITE DWARF - VAN MAANEN’S STAR WITH A SOLAR MASS OF 0.0230 - this is wrong as it has 0.2031 solar masses
HOTTEST WHITE DWARF - V886 CENTAURI WITH A SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF 27,375 K

-------------------------------
COLDEST WHITE DWARF - LAWD 13 A WITH A SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF 4,669 K

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST WHITE DWARFS - LAWD 13 WITH 2

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST CLASS I GAS GIANTS - SAK NICOPA WITH 10 CLASS I GAS GIANTS

SMALLEST ROCKY PLANET - ETA CRUCIS C 5 E WITH A RADIUS OF 369 KM

HEAVIEST GAS GIANT - CAPELLA A 6 WITH 13,063.3945 EARTH MASSES - How do you like this one?
HOTTEST GAS GIANT - CAPELLA A 6 WITH A SURFACE TEMP OF 4,545 K
HEAVIEST CLASS V GAS GIANT - CAPELLA A 6 WITH 13,063.3945 EARTH MASSES
HOTTEST CLASS V GAS GIANT - CAPELLA A 6 WITH A SURFACE TEMP OF 4,545 K

Edit: CLASS V GAS GIANT WITH THE MOST MOONS - CAPELLA A 6 WITH 5

Nuruodo · Feb 2, 2015

hozzdutch said:
HOTTEST CLASS I GAS GIANT - HR 4771 B 5 - SURFACE TEMP 150K

View attachment 12172

SMALLEST ROCKY PLANET - HR 4771 B 6 D - RADIUS OF 373KM

View attachment 12173

having trouble getting them to stay in caps again :-\

How did you fix your caps issue? I had that same problem earlier.

Zenith · Feb 2, 2015

Thanks for the credit rukmerot!

Like I said last night, I'm not after every single record and I'm not checking that often. The records are a pleasant side-effect of making the trip out there.

hozzdutch · Feb 2, 2015

Nuruodo said:
How did you fix your caps issue? I had that same problem earlier.

I've noticed that if I do a post of nothing but caps, it'll automatically get changed to lower case. If I put in a line of text in lower case, then the upper case text stays as it is.
Perhaps it's a forum 'feature' to stop people 'shouting'

R3tCrick3t · Feb 2, 2015

hozzdutch said:
I've just visited HIP 63835. 14 stellar bodies and 3 black holes. I've not been to a system yet with more than 4 stars so I thought this was impressive
View attachment 12194

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST BARYCENTRIC STELLAR BODIES - HIP 63835 - 9 STELLAR BODIES IN BARYCENTRIC ORBITS

View attachment 12195

After seeing the above record, wouldn't it make sense to add another couple of records to the list (and to try and stick with your current formats...
SYSTEM WITH THE MOST BARYCENTRIC BODIES (NON GAS GIANT)
and
SYSTEM WITH THE MOST BARYCENTRIC GAS GIANTS

If you add these then I'll start off one with this -
SYSTEM WITH THE MOST BARYCENTRIC BODIES (NON GAS GIANT) - HIP 63835 - 3 NON GAS GIANT BODIES IN BARYCENTRIC ORBITS

A TYPE STAR WITH THE DEEPEST NESTING - HIP 63835 ABCD 9 - 2ND TIER (i think)

View attachment 12196 View attachment 12197

K TYPE STAR WITH THE DEEPEST NESTING - HIP 63835 ABCD 3 - 2ND TIER

View attachment 12198

SMALLEST T-TYPE - HIP 63835 ABCD 10 A - SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.1130
T-TYPE WITH THE DEEPEST NESTING - HIP 63835 ABCD 10 A - 3RD TIER

View attachment 12199 View attachment 12200

FURTHEST TERRAFORMABLE PLANET FROM SOL - HIP 63835 CD 3 - 275.46LY

View attachment 12201 View attachment 12202 View attachment 12203

added to the books

Patau82 · Feb 2, 2015

Added latest records!:d

PsychoFish · Feb 2, 2015

SMALLEST AMMONIA WORLD
PLAA EURK QC-D B13-1 7 WITH A RADIUS OF 3,198KM

LIGHTEST AMMONIA WORLD
PLAA EURK QC-D B13-1 7 WITH 0.1249 EARTH MASSES

WATER GIANT WITH TE MOST MOONS
WREDGUIA ZU-P D5-12 11 WITH 7 MOONS
or*
WREDGUIA ZU-P D5-12 11 WITH 8 MOONS
* do we count the moon in orbit of another moon?

Cmdr Trav ElEr · Feb 2, 2015

Kalpa said:
I probably wouldn't even have realized this category exists if someone had not mentioned it few posts back... anyway

IMAGE LINK

METAL RICH PLANET WITH LOWEST METAL CONTENT
DROJU SO-O D7-10 1 WITH 33.1%

That would be the high metal content planet with highest metal content I have seen. But haven't checked those much yet for metal content.

Mine usually are around 31%...

and I personally would love to see highest/lowest metal content for most planet types. Just to figure out where FD put the limits between:
metal rich --- high metal content --- rocky

is rocky just 0% or can it have a bit of metal?
(and yes. I am one of those! Not scanning rocks :-( )

Nuruodo · Feb 2, 2015

hozzdutch said:
I've noticed that if I do a post of nothing but caps, it'll automatically get changed to lower case. If I put in a line of text in lower case, then the upper case text stays as it is.
Perhaps it's a forum 'feature' to stop people 'shouting'

Makes sense and good to know. Thanks for that. Though I should point out to the people who designed that "feature" that it didn't stop me from shouting at my computer.

Patau82 · Feb 2, 2015

added 3 new categories for terraformable water worlds, terraformable high metal content planet and terraformable Rocky planets. will keep treeaformable category until records have been moved to their relevant place.
Enjoy!
added latest records!

Ferris · Feb 2, 2015

HOTTEST K-TYPE STAR
PENCIL SECTOR CQ-Y C25 WITH A SURFACE TEMP OF 5,185K

LIGHTEST AMMONIA WORLD
HIP 42048 C 3 WITH 0.1244 EARTH MASSES

AMMONIA WORLD WITH THE LOWEST SURFACE PRESSURE
HIP 42048 C 3 WITH A PRESSURE OF 0.07 ATM

Caps placeholder... Thanks.

PsychoFish · Feb 2, 2015

Patau82 said:
added 3 new categories for terraformable water worlds, terraformable high metal content planet and terraformable Rocky planets. will keep treeaformable category until records have been moved to their relevant place.
Enjoy!
added latest records!

dude ... really? I have to go through all of them again then ... well, my return home might be delayed by that

at least I may be able to hold more records, so I got that going for me

Ferris said:
LIGHTEST AMMONIA WORLD
HIP 42048 C 3 WITH 0.1244 EARTH MASSES

You beat my just posted record by 0.0005 earth masses ... why are you so cruel?

Kalpa · Feb 2, 2015

Is a terraformable water world a water world

VS

Is a class I gas giant a gas giant?

Personally I think we should be seeing subcategories here...

EDIT: To clarify: I think that a terraformable water world should obviously beat any/all records for regular water worlds. If you absolutely need to differentiate, then you might want to add another category for 'non-terraformable water worlds' (then you'd have three: water worlds, terraformable water worlds, non-terraformable water worlds, with the two later being subclasses of the former, and obviously eligible for any/all records for the water world category as well) --- and if devs should go and actually terraform/inhabit some of the previous record holders, what would they become? Yes, this is not simple at all

EDIT2: Current categories work too, but I absolutely think that if any of the terraformable categories beat their parent in normal category, they should be eligible for record. (eg. current terraformable water/metal/rock are subclass/special case of any water/metal/rock records) - just like a class I gas giant with universe-breaking mass would suddenly become the heaviest gas giant of all time, not only of class I gas giants.

Kalpa · Feb 2, 2015

Ender said:
However, your ring issue isn't of the highest priority as you could easily jump to another system. I described this issue in Beta3, here and ticketed it, then, but they have obviously more important issues to deal with.

Yes, I thought they might. If they ever get around to it, I suppose them having enough different tickets about invisible rings might make them able to find a common cause and fix it, though.

Cmdr Trav ElEr · Feb 2, 2015

METAL RICH PLANET WITH MOST MOONS
PW2010 138 CD 4 WITH 2 MOONS CMDR TRAV ELER

(which made me think, in case you desperately wanted more catergories ;-)
ringed version of them all

ringed metal rich with mostmoons/hottest/coldest/biggest/....

and yes I am slightly nuts )

in the same vein of more categories. not formatted correctly as just as an idea:

planetary/stellar object with most directly attached metal rich planets
2Mass blablabla with 8 metal rich planets CMDR LOCO EN EL COCO

Niddi · Feb 2, 2015

I personally think, that too many categories just make it more confusing. Quality over quantity. But that's just my own personal opinion.
Patau, maybe we could ask the exploration community what they want and collect ideas for new categories (if requested) in a separate thread or do a vote or something like this. What do you guys think?

Vicomt · Feb 2, 2015

Personally, I've not been adding my data because it's too much work to troll through the entire list of records against the dozens of systems I scan in a session. I may have some, I may not, but even with the current amount of categories I'm like.. Meh, CBA.

now if there was an automated way of doing it......