Ender you asked me this question:
SMALLEST B-TYPE STAR - R CORONAE AUSTRINI A SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.0132
I strongly suspect there is an error in this record but I can't find any evidence that would support the record (actually, any post with the name of R CORONAE AUSTRINI in it). Rukmerot, would you, please, redirect me to it because if it's true I will add it to my ticket about errors in body properties (a star so small isn't a giant star).
Here it is:
It emits vast amounts of enrgy once in a while so I personally think it is in the midst of collapsing, It has a huge ssolar mass 2 (10. 6211) so i hope i can get a screenshot when it does this again.
And as promised, here's the screenshot you requested (rukmerot still seems to have problems with his forum account).
EDIT: It seems that Rukmerots posts finally got through. He posted several answers for you
here.
Thanks, I somehow missed Rukmerot's post.
Rukmerot, you mean its variable energy emissions are already seen in-game? That's great news for me!
Could this lead to stars changing their class?
Many stars are definitely need to change their class at some point because their temperature is consistent with real data (so they won't change it) but it is outside of range of their classification - they are wrongly classified now so they have wrong designations as eg. is in the case of R Coronae Austrini A (B III star should be larger not much smaller than B IV that is R Coronae Austrini B in-game) that don't match real world designations, as eg. Canopus (and it's still wrong in Release 1.1 Beta - A9 instead of F0)
What's really curious that the status of some planets will also change and some of them will even become stars (strong contender is Capella A 6 - but it's still a planet in Release 1.1 Beta).
Edit: the navigation search option looks like it's working properly, now!