..... When are projectile weapon damage going to go up as distance increases similar to how energy weapon damage goes down with distance? Cannon/plasma/rail fire increases in kinetic energy the more distance to target. If we're going to simulate energy weapon fall-off, we should do the same for projectile pick-up. Instead it seems FD treats decreased damage due to distance the same regardless of weapon. Not asking for 100% accurate kinematics, but it would be trivial to inverse energy weapon's dropoff for projectile weapons.
.... Bullets don't slow down because of friction, but because of air ram. If there was nothing in front of a bullet, and it only encountered the friction on its sides, it would continue almost forever.
Air ramming is most commonly seen with bicycle pumps (and that's why they get hot when used hard). It's also why objects on re-entry (like the space shuttle) get hot too.... nothing to do with friction.
Uplifting to see so many people reveling at a genuine mistake![]()
I think this pseudo physics should only apply to those who choose to play in open. I don't think people playing in solo like peddaling a bycicle downhill in easy mode should have access to the same physics that people do playing in open. The speed of the bicycle should remain constant, and CG contributions in open should accelerate at a geometric rate. Why should people playing in solo have the same acceleration rate? Its not fair....
At some point, Darth Ender is going to be too embarrassed to admit that acceleration is not constant.
The mistake alone would have been forgotten pretty quickly if he hadn't then ridiculed people who corrected it.
I'm sure you're right, but I'm not sure he ridiculed to a greater extent than the average individual replying. Yes he was wrong, but ridiculing is ridiculing either way - being correct doesn't justify it.
And the still-ongoing collective ridiculing is entirely unnecessary. I'm sure everyone would have been much more considerate if this had happened in person.
edit: oops, just seen my sig - perhaps I should practice what I preach!
If you read some of the OP's messages in other posts where he has little to no regard for other's mistakes or follies by other Cmdrs,,,,,,,
Well,,,,,
You might look at the retorts and replies he has gotten from this thread in a less harsh light.
I have eaten my fair share of crow. And I am quite sure I will be served a few plates in the future.
And yes, it does taste bad. But it tastes worse the longer you avoid consuming it. Better to eat it as soon as it's put on the plate.
I just read this thread... and I have no words.
Are these numbers?
Okay but I suspect most contributors had no idea of his posting history and two wrongs don't make a right. Just feel for him as I think I've previously read explanations of Newton's laws that use the term 'acceleration' in such a way that the laws could easily be misinterpreted.