[Video] Griefing : is there a problem?!

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

besieger

besieger
Gregg Rulz ok said:
Sorry, you are wrong, the only places you may get the chance to get blown up are the waypoints in DWE2 and as you may notice, that's predictable, hence, one can prepare for it without modifying your build to deal with some annoying mosquitoes.
Click to expand...

No I am not wrong... I have seen stuff you can't even imagine in this game, trust me when I say you will wish you had actual defenses if you ever see it. not only that you have no idea what type of player you may run into out in the black, people go crazy you know.

Riverside said:
IIRC some modules were made available in outfitting at the detention centre.
Click to expand...

Having been to a few detention ship there is nothing there, when we get sent to a detention ship with a 2A FSD we have to ship our good one and wait, we did the crime now we have to do the time.
 

rhiz

rhiz
Zarek Null said:
There are a number of different reasons why the Distant Worlds 2 expedition is exceedingly harmful to both our natural galaxy, and the future prosperity of humanity. I sought an opportunity to voice these concerns to Distant Worlds 2 leadership many times, and each time, they ignored my urgent request. And that is why, as a last resort, I ordered the Distant Ganks 2 fleet to attack the expedition, which has subsequently led to the destruction of thousands of explorers.

If the DW2 leadership would have sat down and listened to my concerns, I'm certain that we would have reached a peaceful agreement and brought an end to this bitter conflict. But there is so much at stake here that, if diplomacy is off the table, then wiping out their fleet actually serves the greater good because it will actually stop more harm than it causes. When destroying thousands saves billions, then violence is justified. There is a such thing as a just war, and this is one of them.
Click to expand...

I admire your commitment to the fantasy, but I like my lunacy to be internally consistent. :D In what way does DW2 represent a threat to the galaxy and the future prosperity of humanity?
 

Zarek Null

Zarek Null
rhiz said:
I admire your commitment to the fantasy, but I like my lunacy to be internally consistent. :D In what way does DW2 represent a threat to the galaxy and the future prosperity of humanity?
Click to expand...
I have never even received the opportunity to voice my specific concerns because the DW2 expedition refuses to listen.
 

Ziggy Stardust

Ziggy Stardust
rhiz said:
I admire your commitment to the fantasy, but I like my lunacy to be internally consistent. :D In what way does DW2 represent a threat to the galaxy and the future prosperity of humanity?
Click to expand...
They're taking all the attention with them. Which explains the conga line of gankers following them hoping to get some.
 

Riverside

Riverside
besieger said:
Having been to a few detention ship there is nothing there, when we get sent to a detention ship with a 2A FSD we have to ship our good one and wait, we did the crime now we have to do the time.
Click to expand...

Ah maybe it was enabling module shipping then.

It seems to me that there should be ways to get out of any situation without having to use self destruct. Things like White Dwarfs and losing a ship while in an SRV are loose ends. The Detention centre issues were addressed, it'd be good to have other similar 'traps' handled more elegantly too. Running out of fuel has a solution too.

Griefing isn't a problem btw, it's a feature ;)
 

rhiz

rhiz
Stigbob said:
Meh, not exactly hard targets. Pouring a kettle on an ants nest doesn't make you a skilled hunter simply due to your kill count.
Click to expand...

Yes, one of these "notorious" gankers posted log files of his kills some time ago and the vast majority of his victims were low ranked, inexperienced cmdrs. It was rather pitiful.
 

Unknown Zombie

Unknown Zombie
besieger said:
Well this is a nice thread... lots of sarcasm, with a helping of toxic "ALL PVPERS ARE BAD!!!!111!!"

one comment I keep finding pop up is the "I shouldn't have to consider being shot at during exploration", this is wrong. you have no idea what you are going to find out there so prep for the worst case. I explore in a combat T10 currently and covered 13,000 LY in under 6 hours to prove it could be done just as easily as any other exploration ship... and this was with all the server issues and the T10s SC bugs.
Click to expand...

Can you share your build for this ship? I'd like to compare it to mine.

Also what SC bugs does the T-10 have? It has absolutely garbage turn rate -- but other than that I haven't found anything weird to complain about in SC and I've been flying one since the day they were introduced.
 

AP Birdman

Banned
AP Birdman
rhiz said:
Yes, one of these "notorious" gankers posted log files of his kills some time ago and the vast majority of his victims were low ranked, inexperienced cmdrs. It was rather pitiful.
Click to expand...

What are you considering low rank though? Cause I was at CG's trying to PvP when I was novice ranked. Just because someone is low ranked doesn't mean they're terrible at PvP or they don't want to do it. It could be someone's second account for all you know.
 

777Driver

777Driver
Unknown Zombie said:
Can you share your build for this ship? I'd like to compare it to mine.

Also what SC bugs does the T-10 have? It has absolutely garbage turn rate -- but other than that I haven't found anything weird to complain about in SC and I've been flying one since the day they were introduced.
Click to expand...

Never seen any SC bugs on the T-10, am currently out in Omega in a Combat/mining build. Turn rate is fine, get down the gym lad, all you ford Kia drivers ;-)
 

Der Zeitgeist

Der Zeitgeist
Replicant said:
A few dozen that have managed to kill close to two thousand jumpers.

Quite the achievement.
Click to expand...

Mediocre.

RJhpDay.jpg
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom