There's also no way for FDEV to reply to it as its so nebulous, its ultimately self defeating.
ALSO not true.
There's also no way for FDEV to reply to it as its so nebulous, its ultimately self defeating.
ALSO not true.
And I can.Then you should be able to summarise the issue easily.
No. Feedback is welcome. I just have an issue with 18 users (or 21 now apparently) posting in the name of the “community” I am supposed to be part of and requesting signatures in an obscure and non actually traceable site.
If that is the main way you choose to offer "feedback" I personally much rather you opt to simply take the simple and honest advice offfered above instead and stop spending in the product. I can assure you that kind of message will actually be much more clearly received and much more proactively actioned by the concerned company than the one in this OP. And above all, it will indeed show FDEV an exact, extremely specific and measurable picture of this community.
Believe it or not, I am afraid this thread is all about the OP.
I really hope they can also take criticism and feedback on board. If they did not want to be exposed to that then they should have followed a more direct and private channel with FDEV.
And I can.
So you can't summarize it then ?.
Why wouldn't it? They have cake https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threa...e-we-have-cake-of-course.524853/#post-8050379Seems its a closed subject for Frontier towers.
I could... but I didn't post it so why would I?
Could you please summarise it for me?
Don't you mean "a very tiny, practically insignificant minority of the community, I really wouldn't bother myself with it really"?Can't you as a mod change the thread title to "part of the community".
Disagree and the range does make a difference and so does integrity, with the trade off being power draw.
Also, what argument that its too hard? I thought my point in this little side discussion was that i didn't agree with sensors being linked to gimballed performance. I believe I am allowed to have that opinion?
I would summarize it as a random collection of petty gripes with some personal bug-bears and deliberate ignorance thrown in along the way.
You're prematurely terminating our discussion? How dare you!
Don't you mean "a very tiny, practically insignificant minority of the community, I really wouldn't bother myself with it really"?
Point 1: In PvE none of this matters at all- range is a nice to have but thats about it. 2: in a game about crafting an individual ship, surely more options to tweak is better than none? Where rather than face a binary choice you can instead have shades between, at the same time filling out logical gaps that justifies the mass each set has.
To me they aren't important at all. Not one of them and there's no picklage in sight either.
All it shows is how divided the committee that ruined the petition are. Try a one line version instead next time.
Generalized GRRRR just isn't a workable slogan.
It turns it from a petition to an argument.
"Meat is murder", is a good example agree or disagree the point is clear and its catchy. It also fits on a protest sign.
"We want a large variety of sometimes mutually exclusive stuff and things GRR". Just isn't really in the same league.
There's also no way for FDEV to reply to it as its so nebulous, its ultimately self defeating.
Haven't you heard the latest? We're all SDC now, even Coriolis.io and ObsidianAnt![]()
So you did read it. Why did you need a summary then?
I betSorry, it just came out.![]()
Looking forward to the 500 staff but how many on Elite/maintenance mode/doom threads.