We Need to be Better as a Community

Respectfully and kindly agreeing to disagree is a grossly undervalued skill, but it's fully possible. But this forum, and most of the big bad internet, is breeding grounds to a snarky troll culture that really needs to die. Yeah, trolling can be anarchistic fun, but it doesn't need to be so hostile. And we're trying to actually discuss things here, it's not a snarky remark contest!
Your post above was quite snarky though.
Toxic regards,
Socially Awkward Gamer Bro with a Mom who didn't do her job
 

Deleted member 38366

D
Long Thread, but it got me thinking...

Petty Details aside, the OP is onto something. Fundamentally, because we're all humans. Simple as that.

Looking at myself, I certainly - like many others - have built personal preferences, have things that I like, things that I dislike - and openly argument and discuss along those likes/dislikes.
Along the way, I'm sure I got a little grumpy over the years, occasionally a tad sarcastic or maybe cynical. And I'm convinced naturally others will have liked or disliked that just as well, as that's not a 1-way road.

So after having followed this Thread a little and with 2020 arriving soon(tm), I thought : Well, how about some change? Maybe this works...
Thus, I made the decision to what I can only describe as pushing a "reset button".
Let's try this, it can't harm. If it turns out to be a mistake - I can reconsider anytime. At least I tried :)

I even emptied what I call the "Dust bin".
153037


Maybe that's a helpful inspiration to others.

And just because it fits quite well :
 
Lost cause. New posters get mobbed by the serial whingers and either join in, poke them with the comedy stick or give up on it.
Or they come in with a bit of criticism and immediately get jumped on by you or Ezren or whoever with a snarky reply. I'm just saying, it really works both ways on this forum.
Also a funny observation: both sides of whatever the discussion is about, tend to call the other ones 'a vocal minority'.
Meh, I just don't like extreme points of view in general I guess. 🤷‍♂️
 
I posted this in response to another thread, but I think the message is important so I am making it a main thread also, was written in response to a new player who made a bit of a mistake about what he was saying then got a lot of negativity about it :

Having read a lot now of what has been posted in reply to your post, I have the following comments.

It is really not right all the toxicity you have had to endure, and I totally do not accept it. You made a mistake by thinking <whatever not really important>. You said on your post that you were just a casual player. All of the <> you are getting is not right. Just another example of toxicity on this forum. You made a mistake, so what? No excuse for nastiness from those who know better. And we have all been beginners/casual level at one point.

Cant we be better than this, as a community ?

How do you think the OP is going to feel, next time he wants to post something?

Maybe he is going to think twice about it now. Is that REALLY what we want? For voices to be silenced because of all the toxicity that gets thrown around? Because that is for sure what is happening. People need a VERY thick skin to stick around this forum. I know many CMDRs who just wont post here for that very reason, they are fed up with <> that gets thrown their way just for voicing opinion.

Now I am not going to call anyone out, I dont want to embarrass or provoke anyone, and I dont want to get yet another warning for "flaming" aka defending myself when toxicity gets thrown my way.

OP has been put into the "Victim's Dilemma", yet again. Harsh responses elicit both you and toxic poster get a warning and banned from posting to the thread for 3 days + posts removed. Do nothing and mods will just ignore those toxic comments. Happens a lot in life and I call it the "Victim's Dilemma". Someone does something to you and its not serious enough for authority to care but you do something back then you become the criminal and suddenly whole thing is taken seriously. It is a lose-lose scenario.

So what is the solution to all of this, in the context of the Elite: Dangerous official forum ?

The mods have no will to solve it. One can see on the very first page of this thread comments that are clearly disparaging to the OP and his post, and the next a post in response to this thread by a Mod. The moderation team read this comment yet chose to do nothing. Frontier knows these forums have a bad reputation for toxicity yet choose to do nothing.

It is up to us, THE COMMUNITY, to do what we can to solve this problem of chronic toxicity, and what I propose is this :

1. SPEAK UP. If you see someone being denigrated, tone policed, baited, insulted or any of the other words that just mean using words to hurt another person then : SAY SOMETHING. Say it is not right and that you do not agree with it. There is a massive difference between disagreeing with someone thence attacking the premise or logic of their arguments and attacking THAT PERSON as a person. They are alike, yet not alike. Confuse them not.

2. NO NAMING AND SHAMING. This does absolutely no good and just causes fights/flame wars. Dont do it. People might also have a good motive and just made a mistake in their wording, you dont know. Dont call people out, it is just repeating the whole cycle we are trying to break.

3. GIVE THE REASONS WHY TOXICITY ON THESE FORUMS IS A BAD THING
3.1 It is discouraging people from having a voice. Many people are thin skinned and end up banned or just leave these forums because of this. Every voice adds value.
3.2 It is giving these forums a bad reputation. People prefer to post on reddit or face book rather than here and who can blame them? We should be an example to other communities. Compare and contrast to Kerbal Space Program official forums.
3.3 It is causing a lot of anger and bad feeling. Many people who aught be fast friends because of strong shared interest and passion are falling out or getting enmity.
3.4 It makes the forums a generally nasty place, one must always wonder when posting how someone is going to attack, knowing any defence of oneself is likely to elicit a warning
3.5 I know most people dont give a dam about anyone but themselves. But for the odd few who are the exception, knowing the toxicity is upsetting people and making others unhappy aught be reason enough to want to clean these forums up.
3.6 And probably many, many other reasons, I leave it to the ingenium of the individual to work out, state of affairs is good for no-one.

And I know many people will say it cant be done, the will is not there, we wont get everyone on board, etc, etc. It only takes a few respected CMDRs to consistently lend voice when they notice toxicity for things to change for the better. As it was rightly said "One carat of diamond is worth several tons of sand; we dont need the majority". We should be an example in space sim community, not a toxic cess pit.

CMDR Gavin786

I appreciate the intentions behind this post. I also like the concept of a victims dilemma in the face of one-sided or overzealous moderation. And your rules of thumb for reducing toxicity are good.

It would do the forums a world of good if we did not post anonymously either.

One small exception if I may - naming and shaming.

Sometimes the actions of individuals are egregious enough to be called out to the community. The direct and heated debates we had with griefers involved in seal clubbing had some impact on Frontier developing a better crime and punishement system in addition to a better starter experience for new players. This is not to say it is perfect. The naming of reddit forums where UA bombers planned the attack on Dove Enigma is another example. In both cases, calling these actors out (if only indirectly) had the impact of community involvement for the common good.

I'm not arguing your reasoning on this matter is ill advised. It is well taken to my mind. But these guidelines can't be rigid rules as there are circumstances which arguably necessitate breaking them.

Nonetheless, nicely done. :)
 
The thing that's consistently amazed me about gaming forums since the dawn of the internet is how many people take them seriously. I mean you can tell my actual 'please take this comment 100% seriously' posts on here pretty easily - they're the ones where someone asks something like 'hey, what's the biggest fuel scoop you can fit on an Anaconda?' and I reply 'class 7 mate'. As soon as we move into opinion rather than simple factual answers an element of hyperbole will creep into some responses, but that's just me. People often chuck out 'would you talk to people in real life like you do on the internet?' and in my case the answer is 'err yeah, I do. All the time actually.'

We're discussing a computer game here but some of the stuff I see on the forum is so overwrought that it's frankly impossible to take it seriously. I'm actually quite envious of people who can find the emotional energy needed to (for example) post for weeks about the colour of a button in the interface, or the supposed evils of a virtual currency, because on my own list of life concerns, these are things that would come in at about #127,568 on the list, right after 'are Wagon Wheels really smaller than they used to be or are my hands just bigger?'

Genuinely toxic behaviour is dealt with pretty well on here by the mods. I don't see much at all in the way of racism, sexism, religious intolerance etc and when it does appear, it's usually dealt with promptly. A bit of t1t-for-tat (God these wordfilters...) name calling is not 'toxic' behaviour, it's something that most reasonable adults should be able to deal with and if necessary, give a little back in kind. Frank exchanges of views are not something that I expect to be protected from as an adult.

I've never gone through life expecting that everybody is going to love me, like me, or care about what I have to say. Firstly it avoids disappointment and secondly, it means I don't have to hold others to unreasonable standards either.
 

Deleted member 110222

D
Imagine my surprise, when only the second response was snarky edge lord crap. OP is spot on, the norm on this forum is "funny" trolling or "clever" insults, mostly by dedicated gamer bros who think they're somehow more worthy than the casual plebs or forum dads. I've stated it before and I'll do it again: no matter how much you think you're the real community and others are somehow less deserving because they're not as dedicated (hey, we have actual lives!) and not as gamer bro, you're simply wrong. Gaming is no longer exclusive to a subculture of young socially awkward men, it's mainstream. Gamer bros have become a minority, and I think that's what angers them. QED: gamergate and similar incidents, backlash over female/gay game characters, etc.

Now, barring the general toxicity and self-centered attitude, I have nothing against young male gamers. I used to be one (albeit with considerably better manners and more consideration for others, I guess my mom did a better job than yours). Just understand that you're not the gate keepers of the community, you don't represent the community, and you have no more say-so than anyone else in the community.

Peace & love,
Middle Class Forum Dad Social Justice Warrior
I take a snarky sarcastic approach because that is exactly what everyone else does.

Just people don't like it when I do so because I'm not following the desires of this game's "aristocracy".

Basically then my real life. Act the same, but get shouted at for not conforming.

inhales deeply

exhales with satisfaction

Wouldn't have it any other way.

winks
 
The thing that's consistently amazed me about gaming forums since the dawn of the internet is how many people take them seriously. I mean you can tell my actual 'please take this comment 100% seriously' posts on here pretty easily - they're the ones where someone asks something like 'hey, what's the biggest fuel scoop you can fit on an Anaconda?' and I reply 'class 7 mate'. As soon as we move into opinion rather than simple factual answers an element of hyperbole will creep into some responses, but that's just me. People often chuck out 'would you talk to people in real life like you do on the internet?' and in my case the answer is 'err yeah, I do. All the time actually.'

We're discussing a computer game here but some of the stuff I see on the forum is so overwrought that it's frankly impossible to take it seriously. I'm actually quite envious of people who can find the emotional energy needed to (for example) post for weeks about the colour of a button in the interface, or the supposed evils of a virtual currency, because on my own list of life concerns, these are things that would come in at about #127,568 on the list, right after 'are Wagon Wheels really smaller than they used to be or are my hands just bigger?'

Genuinely toxic behaviour is dealt with pretty well on here by the mods. I don't see much at all in the way of racism, sexism, religious intolerance etc and when it does appear, it's usually dealt with promptly. A bit of t1t-for-tat (God these wordfilters...) name calling is not 'toxic' behaviour, it's something that most reasonable adults should be able to deal with and if necessary, give a little back in kind. Frank exchanges of views are not something that I expect to be protected from as an adult.

I've never gone through life expecting that everybody is going to love me, like me, or care about what I have to say. Firstly it avoids disappointment and secondly, it means I don't have to hold others to unreasonable standards either.

I agree with pretty much all of this. That is not a reason not to try to be polite or tolerant of different playstyles & approaches to the game.

That you are amazed that people talk seriously about relevant topics to a niche forum is the main point where my view differs from yours. The official forum of the game developer is exactly where I would expect that kind of conversation to be.
 
I agree with pretty much all of this. That is not a reason not to try to be polite or tolerant of different playstyles & approaches to the game.

That you are amazed that people talk seriously about relevant topics to a niche forum is the main point where my view differs from yours. The official forum of the game developer is exactly where I would expect that kind of conversation to be.

I'm willing to bet that you only disagree with the first sentence of his post.
Which I agree seems kind of disconnected from the rest of it, but we've all been there. I agree on agreeing with the rest of it though.
 
I agree with pretty much all of this. That is not a reason not to try to be polite or tolerant of different playstyles & approaches to the game.

That you are amazed that people talk seriously about relevant topics to a niche forum is the main point where my view differs from yours. The official forum of the game developer is exactly where I would expect that kind of conversation to be.

It's not the talking seriously I have a hard time with, it's the taking of oneself overly seriously. I can discuss games all day. I expressed that badly.
 
It's not the talking seriously I have a hard time with, it's the taking of oneself overly seriously. I can discuss games all day. I expressed that badly.
Yep. Important topics with critical debate that exist solely within the context of the game; which in its overall context is ranked below the Wagon Wheels concern in terms of actual personal investment required and umbrage both given and received.

Though now that the WW question has been answered, Pretend Spaceman Details can move up a rank in importance!
 
It's not the talking seriously I have a hard time with, it's the taking of oneself overly seriously. I can discuss games all day. I expressed that badly.

Fair enough :) It's difficult to understand more precisely what you have in mind without being specific, and that vicious circle of examples & counter-examples is probably best avoided considering the response the OP received to the example thread they referred to.

My aim is almost always to find the common ground - I look for ways to accept other views rather than ways to disagree for the sake of it.

But I also generally only post when whatever view I have has not already been said. That inevitably means I more usually take the minority view when I participate in a thread. I think you probably do too.
 
Fair enough :) It's difficult to understand more precisely what you have in mind without being specific, and that vicious circle of examples & counter-examples is probably best avoided considering the response the OP received to the example thread they referred to.

Yes, I was deliberately not heading into that territory. It's not a good place to visit.
 
Or they come in with a bit of criticism and immediately get jumped on by you or Ezren or whoever with a snarky reply. I'm just saying, it really works both ways on this forum.
Also a funny observation: both sides of whatever the discussion is about, tend to call the other ones 'a vocal minority'.
Meh, I just don't like extreme points of view in general I guess. 🤷‍♂️

Sir, this is the internet.
 
Yeah, and sorry about my post being snarky, I thought the snarky gamer bros would understand me better if I spoke their language.
 
...With the internet, everyone are just their own spirit floating around unable to physically interact. This causes them to return to their spirit self. What you were before you were born. Your essence.

Please meditate over this and realize that what you are, is not your body, but it affect everyone. Be polite and your soul will be good.
...Please!!! running around silent and conformed souls in the void
TALK TO ME!! PLEASE! looking at a soul that do not dare to speak their true mind

I just want to discuss something without the veil of the social contract hanging over my head. looking at the silent soul
...so, just our souls on the internet then?

:)
 
Your post above was quite snarky though.
Toxic regards,
Socially Awkward Gamer Bro with a Mom who didn't do her job

I think I'm reading a little bit of sarcasm here, which implies you should be able understand my sarcasm as well (and I suspect you did). Same applies to a lot of people reacting to my post. Is it just that sarcasm as a delivery method is OK only when you agree with the message?

But seriously, nasty/snarky as a default mode of communication in the gamer community is just sad. That sort of stuff works (in a humoristic sense) with your mates in real life, but definitely doesn't in a wider context, especially when limited to written communication (and involving people who aren't native English speakers, but even native speakers are very likely to misread the intended tone in written communication). People who insist on doing it anyway are either wilfully or out of ignorance making the community very exclusive. And as I said, judging from how a section of the gaming community reacts to all attempts at inclusiveness in the industry, these people are dead set on keeping it exclusive. This flies in the face of actual statistical facts and potentially hurts the games' bottom line. I seriously don't understand FDev's laizzes faire attitude to the community.
 
Holy hell this thread is still going.

Lesson 1: Just because people can say things, doesn't mean they should be listened to. Likewise, if you don't like what someone's saying, don't listen. Lord knows, too many people think others should be silenced because they can't follow this simple lesson.

Lesson 2: Those that declare others "toxic" are very often no only hypocrites, but instigators. "People shouldn't call each other 'names', those stupid 'names'. I can excuse myself for doing it because I'm on this high horse I climbed up on".

Lesson 3: It's your own problem if you read things wrong. A lot of people like to use the 'language barrier' excuse or speak on behalf of those with a language barrier. If you don't understand, you ask.

Lesson 4: Unwatch and ignore.
 
...
But seriously, nasty/snarky as a default mode of communication in the gamer community is just sad. That sort of stuff works (in a humoristic sense) with your mates in real life, but definitely doesn't in a wider context, especially when limited to written communication (and involving people who aren't native English speakers, but even native speakers are very likely to misread the intended tone in written communication).
No matter how I read this, it makes sense :)
Written English is easy to misinterpret (puts up hand) and read entirely 'wrong'... Whereas 'spoken' tonal inflection serves the purpose of delivering a message with a much reduced chance of errors.
 
Back
Top Bottom