With the aquatic animals they've revealed, I'm hoping that we get a pliosaur and Archelon to complete the sea reptile family. Either Kronosaurus or Lliopleurodon would be great.
Well, considering how closely related--and therefore similar--a lot of these animals are, there's going to be a lot of similar, if not identical behavior anyways... so it's kind of inevitable, regardless of the numbers...Why don't we all stop at the idea of adding MORE animals for the sake of it and instead we focus on one each, but with a more complete behaviour spectrum? I'm already worried about 75 creatures at the idea they will all behave in the same way.
What is even the point of 11 animals if they're all shallowHey, hey, hey,
What a week it's been. I'm super excited for these next few months to pass by so that Evolution 2 gets closer to its release date. I am super excited about what we've learned about how the game is going to work as well as many of the new animals that have been introduced so far. I've been updating my request list and have discovered some pretty unique ones over the course.
1. Turanoceratops
2. Walgettosuchus
3. Microvenator
4. Alvarezsaurus
5. Bactrosaurus
6. Avaceratops
7. Borogovia
8. Santanaraptor
9. Masiakasaurus
10. Hesperosaurus
11. Pelorosaurus
People are not adding more animals for the sake of it. Frontier is going to add more animals through DLC at some point, all people are doing, are saying, is what animals they would like to see. Don't rain on other people's parade.Why don't we all stop at the idea of adding MORE animals for the sake of it and instead we focus on one each, but with a more complete behaviour spectrum? I'm already worried about 75 creatures at the idea they will all behave in the same way.
Don't apologize, you have nothing to be sorry for. Some people have nothing better to do than pick and poke at other people.I'm sorry about my latest post. I didn't want to add more to the list I already made on my last post and I didn't want to add too many so that's why I thought these eleven animals would do and I thought they seemed interesting because of like different sizes than typical or it'd be interesting to get more of certain species from locations you wouldn't normally think like sauropods from Europe, smaller theropods from South America or Australia but I'm sure people do know but that's not the point. I don't know what we'll get when Evolution 2 comes out despite what we've learned so far and believe me, there are some I really want to see in action, mostly Therizinosaurus and Oviraptor. I want to see what they'll do with the latter but have they had time to develop it?, is it going to be in a Dominion DLC even though it's in the opening sequence? Will Quetzalcoatlus and Argentinosaurus be a thing in the game? I wasn't sure due to how big they are, but I'll have faith in them.
The worst take of the thread20) Eurhinosaurus = the only ichytosaur that is actually cool and special
Potentially, though I'm more intrigued by the criticism of other lists for being bland and then advocating for some of the blandest stuff out there (it's truly self centric).The worst take of the thread
Dunkleosteus isn't from the Mesozoic era and until we get something more obvious (Dimetrodon, Wooly Mammoth, etc.) I wouldn't count on it being included. And I'm pretty sure the claim of Jeholopterus being a vampire bat-like animal are all fake.My list (in no specific order):
- Dunkleosteus (vicious, giant predator fish)
- Jeholopterus (literally the vampire of the Dinosaur world, very weird look)
Looking into it, who else would it be for bizarre Pterosaur theories, of course it's David Peters (of all the people, he's the one to steer clear of, including his website, ReptileEvolution.com).Dunkleosteus isn't from the Mesozoic era and until we get something more obvious (Dimetrodon, Wooly Mammoth, etc.) I wouldn't count on it being included. And I'm pretty sure the claim of Jeholopterus being a vampire bat-like animal are all fake.